№ files_lp_3_process_7_082279
File format: docx
Character count: 1987
File size: 16 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Advent, Christmas preparation
Document Type:
Religious message
Organization / Institution:
Lutheran Church
Author:
Pastor Lisa Peterson
Target Audience:
Congregation, Christians
Period of Action:
December 2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A religious message discussing the importance of Advent and preparing for the coming of Christ, emphasizing traditions and spiritual reflection during the Christmas season.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
‘I have bits and pieces’: Comparing accounts of the Holocaust from survivors and their grandchildren
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Holocaust memory, generational storytelling, survivor narratives
Document type:
Research paper
Institution:
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, USC Shoah Foundation Visual History Archive
Author:
Tamar Aizenberg
Target Audience:
Scholars, students, Holocaust remembrance organizations
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Island
Topic:
Tournament, Hypnosis, Assassination
Document Type:
Narrative
Organization / Institution:
None
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Fiction readers
Effective Period:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Context:
Fictional story about a tournament on an island with hypnotic elements and assassination attempts.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Utah
Topic:
Memoir, Commentary, Ad Critique
Document Type:
Portfolio
Author:
BreeAnn Campbell
Target Audience:
General public, students, educators
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
The document is a personal portfolio showcasing three written projects:
a memoir, a commentary, and an ad critique, reflecting the author’s growth in writing skills.
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
Richmond County Schools
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Conversational scripts for voice acting
Document type:
Audio script
Author:
Sharon
Target audience:
Voice actors, audio producers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Context
This is an audio script used for voice acting practice, featuring dialogues with specific tones and emotions for three characters:
Sarah, Kylie, and Gina.
Year:
1800–1904
Region:
Europe, United Kingdom, Russia
Theme:
Classical and Traditional Music
Document Type:
Music Compilation with Descriptions
Authors/Composers:
Anonymous (Suo Gân), Gustav Mahler, Sergei Rachmaninoff, Camille Saint-Saëns, Clara Schumann, Samuel Coleridge-Taylor
Original Performance Locations:
Moscow, Dresden, various
Intended Audience:
Music enthusiasts, researchers, general public
Content Type:
Musical works with historical and contextual notes
Sources:
YouTube links to performances
Purpose:
Inform about historical context, composition, and interpretation of selected music pieces
Year:
Not specified
Location:
Not specified
Topic:
Jewelry, Cost Calculation
Document Type:
Problem Statement / Puzzle
Organization:
Rattler’s Jewellers
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
General public / Puzzle solvers
Related Cost:
$26 for a new chain, $27 via naive method
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Kigali, Rwanda
Topic:
Human rights, Detention, Arbitrary arrest
Document Type:
Urgent action
Organ / Institution:
Amnesty International
Author:
Amnesty International
Target Audience:
Public, Human rights activists
Period of validity:
Until 30 January 2020
Approval date:
28 November 2019
Date of changes:
28 November 2019
Context:
Urgent action appeal calling for the release of Jackie Umuhoza, detained without trial in Rwanda under accusations of treason and espionage.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Peoria, Illinois
Theme:
Ministry, Community Service, Education
Document Type:
Pastor’s Report
Organization:
Forrest Hill United Methodist Church
Author:
Rev. Tyson T. Parks III
Target Audience:
Church members, congregation
Action Period:
July 1st - Present
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Willmar, New London, Spicer, Blomkest, Lake Lillian, Prinsburg
Topic:
Church pastors and contact information
Document Type:
Contact List
Organization:
Various Lutheran, Catholic, Baptist, and Methodist Churches
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Church staff and congregants
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Date:
January 2022
Event Dates:
January 22–23, 2022
Region:
Archdiocese of Hartford, Connecticut
Issuing Body:
Archdiocese of Hartford
Department:
Center for Catholic Education & Formation
Author:
Fr. Michael Whyte, Vicar for Catholic Education & Formation
Contact Person:
Maggie Slysz, Director of Marketing and Enrollment
Subject:
Promotion of the Archdiocesan Catholic High School Collection
Type of Document:
Pastoral fundraising letter and promotional guidance
Intended Audience:
Pastors
Related Campaign:
“There’s Something Greater Here” marketing campaign
Financial Purpose:
Tuition assistance, technology enhancements, curricular improvements, marketing
Statistical Highlights:
100% graduation rate; 98% college attendance rate; SAT scores above state and national averages; 100,989 hours of student-led community service
Financial Impact Statement:
Annual savings to Connecticut taxpayers of $163,252,382
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Frankenmuth, MI
Topic:
Continuing Education, Ministry Reflection
Document Type:
CEU Verification Form
Organization:
Concordia Seminary
Author:
Erika Petsch
Target Audience:
Pastors attending the North and East Pastors Conference
Effective Period:
May 19-20, 2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2014
Region / City:
East Ohio, São Paulo, Portland
Topic:
Holiness and Pastoral Formation
Document Type:
Event Report
Organization:
Holiness Church
Author:
Kevin Mannoia
Target Audience:
Church Leaders, Pastors, Academics
Period:
November 2014
Approval Date:
November 7, 2014
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
South Dakota
Topic:
Pastor Compensation
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
ELCA (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America)
Author:
SD Synod
Target Audience:
Ministers, Congregational Councils, Tax Advisors
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Language:
English
Document Type:
Pastoral guide
Subject:
Christian funeral practices and pastoral care
Intended Audience:
Pastors and ministers
Religious Tradition:
Christian Church
Purpose:
Guidance on ministering to the bereaved and conducting funerals
Contents:
Introduction; The Pastor’s Role; Visiting at the Deathbed; Visiting with the Family after Death; Planning the Funeral; Visitation; Preparing for the Funeral; Burial of the Dead; Post Funeral Soul Care; Appendices with samples and checklists
Appendices:
Sample Obituary; Sample Funeral Program; Checklists for Funeral Arrangements; Suggested Funeral Sermon Texts
Referenced Work:
On Death and Dying by Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, M.D.
Topics Covered:
Grief counseling; funeral traditions; sermon preparation; pastoral conduct; prayers and psalms for the dying
Year:
2023
Region / City:
San Antonio, TX
Topic:
Mental Health, Church Ministry, Suicide Prevention
Document Type:
Article
Organization:
Covenant Presbyterian Church
Author:
Dan Milford
Target Audience:
Pastors, Church Leaders, Congregations, Individuals with Mental Illness
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2018
Location:
Bossey, Switzerland
Theme:
Ecumenical education and Christian unity
Document type:
Article / Case study
Organization:
World Council of Churches
Author:
Melanio L. Aoanan
Audience:
Pastors, theological educators, church leaders
Period covered:
20th–21st century
Event:
70th anniversary of the World Council of Churches
Photographer:
Albin Hillert
Institutions mentioned:
Southern Christian College, Brokenshire College
Year:
2017-2019
Region / City:
Charlotte
Topic:
Pastoral Service, Church Leadership
Document Type:
Guideline
Institution:
Presbytery of Charlotte
Author:
Committee on Ministry
Target Audience:
Elders in the Presbyterian Church
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified