№ lp_1_2_64322
File format: docx
Character count: 3863
File size: 93 KB
Off-the-job training is described as activities and tasks that can support apprenticeships, with clear evidence and specific criteria to meet standards.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Effective Date:
February 21, 2025
Benefit Year Start:
October 1
Employee Category:
Full-time, Part-time, Seasonal/Temporary
Accrual Rate:
1 hour per 30 hours worked
Use of ETO:
For qualifying reasons under the Michigan Earned Sick Time Act (ESTA)
Cash Out:
Up to 60 hours at the end of the Benefit Year
Re-Hire Policy:
ETO restored if re-hired within 2 months
Adopted Date:
March 20, 2025
Procedure for Use:
Employee must designate ESTA qualifying reasons in writing
Purpose:
To outline the policies for paid earned time off and Michigan Earned Sick Time Act compliance.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Walvis Basin, offshore Namibia
Topic:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Regulatory Document
Organization / Institution:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Author:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Target Audience:
Interested and/or Affected Parties (I&APs)
Period of Action:
2026–2027 (estimated)
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Walvis Basin, Offshore Namibia
Topic:
Environmental Impact Assessment, Offshore Exploration
Document Type:
Environmental Clearance Application
Organization / Institution:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited, Environmental Resources Management (ERM)
Author:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Target Audience:
Interested and/or Affected Parties (I&APs), Environmental Regulators
Period of Validity:
2026-2027
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Louisville
Subject:
Faculty policies, time off, professional development
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
University of Louisville, School of Medicine
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Faculty members of the School of Medicine
Effective Period:
Annual
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Invoice submission process
Document Type:
Instruction manual
Organization / Institution:
Georgia Power
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Vendors submitting invoices
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Santa Fe
Subject:
Employee onboarding and offboarding procedure
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization / Institution:
City of Santa Fe, Information Technology and Telecommunication Division
Author:
Human Resources Department, ITT Division
Target Audience:
Departments within the City of Santa Fe
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Walvis Basin, Namibia
Topic:
Environmental Impact Assessment, Exploration Drilling
Document Type:
Environmental Clearance Application
Organization:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Author:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Target Audience:
Interested and/or Affected Parties (I&APs), Environmental Authorities, Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
2026–2027
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Document Type:
Employee Handbook section
Topics:
Working hours, Paid Time Off, Holidays, Sick leave, Long-term illness, Bereavement leave, Jury duty, Voting, Parental leave, Maternity and Paternity leave
Organization:
Not specified
Audience:
Employees
Policy Duration:
Ongoing
Accrual:
PTO accrues monthly from the first day of employment
Maximum PTO:
25 days per year
Holiday Observance:
List of U.S. federal holidays with floating day option
Sick Leave:
One week, paid
Long-Term Illness:
Up to 12 weeks unpaid under FMLA
Bereavement Leave:
Three days paid, additional unpaid for travel
Jury Duty and Voting:
Paid or unpaid as per law
Parental Leave:
Up to three months paid, compliant with FMLA where applicable
Work Hours:
9 a.m.–7 p.m. weekdays, flexible start times, shift schedules in some departments
Year:
2013
Region / City:
London
Theme:
Forests, history, social and environmental memory
Document Type:
Exhibition narrative
Institution:
St. John on Bethnal Green
Author:
Paul Gough
Target Audience:
General public, academics, artists, historians
Period of validity:
6th – 11th June 2013
Approval Date:
2013
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Paris
Topic:
Social Responsibility in Football
Document Type:
Event Report
Organization:
EFDN, ECA, UEFA Foundation for Children
Target Audience:
Football practitioners, project leaders, decision makers, community engaged clubs, foundations, football associations, and leagues
Period of Action:
21st March - 8th April 2018
Approval Date:
21st March 2018
Date of Last Change:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Importance of attending classes in person
Document Type:
Religious lecture
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Shaykh Muhammad Ghaalib
Target Audience:
Students of knowledge
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Medicine treatment, consent for off-label use
Document type:
Consent form
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Patients and medical personnel
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Contextual Description:
A document providing detailed examples of the classification of programme and support costs for humanitarian projects.
Year:
2004
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Marine Warranty, Offshore Construction
Document Type:
Code of Practice
Organization:
Joint Rig Committee
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, Underwriters, Assured
Effective Period:
2004–ongoing
Approval Date:
15 July 2004
Amendment Date:
3 September 2019
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Year:
2002
Organization:
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Document Type:
Professional guideline
Topic:
Nutrition Care Process, PES Statements, Nutrition Diagnosis
Target Audience:
Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs)
Steps:
Nutrition Assessment, Nutrition Diagnosis, Nutrition Intervention, Nutrition Monitoring/Evaluation
PES Components:
Problem, Etiology, Signs and Symptoms
Classification:
Intake, Clinical, Behavioral
Examples Included:
Yes
References:
eatrightpro.org, andeal.org, jrnjournal.org