№ lp_1_13423
File format: docx
Character count: 47726
File size: 124 KB
This document provides guidelines for Marine Warranty Surveyors and related parties involved in offshore construction operations, detailing their roles, responsibilities, and approval processes for critical operations.
Year:
2004
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Marine Warranty, Offshore Construction
Document Type:
Code of Practice
Organization:
Joint Rig Committee
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, Underwriters, Assured
Effective Period:
2004–ongoing
Approval Date:
15 July 2004
Amendment Date:
3 September 2019
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year of issue:
2012–2019
Organization:
Joint Rig Committee
Document type:
Code of Practice / Scope of Work / Certificate Requirements
Region:
International offshore operations
Target audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, underwriters, project assurance teams
Version:
1–3
Date of issue:
27 January 2012, 20 December 2016, 03 September 2019
Changes:
Original; Update to COP & SOW and introduction of JR2012A; Update to COP & SOW
Approval requirements:
Marine Warranty Surveyor certification, compliance with COP and SOW
Operations covered:
Rig location, rig move, marine operations, equipment suitability
Confidentiality and conflict of interest considerations:
Included
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Cornwall
Theme:
Geothermal energy, drilling services, tender invitation
Document type:
Invitation to Tender (ITT)
Issuer:
Eden Geothermal Limited
Target Audience:
Companies offering independent audit services for drilling rigs
Period of Validity:
Until 22nd December 2020
Date of Approval:
27th November 2020
Date of Last Modification:
27th November 2020
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Marine Warranty Surveyor Practices
Document Type:
Code of Practice
Organization / Institution:
Joint Rig Committee
Author:
Joint Rig Committee
Target Audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, Underwriters, Assured
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
4/10/2021
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Marine Warranty Surveyor Operations, Offshore Projects
Document Type:
Code of Practice (COP)
Organization / Institution:
Joint Rig Committee
Author:
Joint Rig Committee
Target Audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, Underwriters, Offshore Project Managers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
10 April 2018
Amendment Date:
03 September 2019
Project:
Eden Geothermal Project
Tender reference:
EGL-ITT-C055
Revision:
Ver 1.0
Release Date:
27th November 2020
Issuer:
Eden Geothermal Limited (“EGL”)
Supplier Response Date:
Friday 18th December at 16.00
Contents:
PART A: INSTRUCTIONS TO TENDERERS, PART B: BACKGROUND INFORMATION, PART C: EGL’s REQUIREMENTS / SCOPE OF WORK, PART D: RETURN OF TENDER, PART E: EVALUATION PROCESS, PART F: CONDITIONS, PART G: SCHEDULES (TENDER SUBMISSION TEMPLATES)
Appendices:
Appendix A: Summary Specifications of the MND Bentec 450mt Eurorig, Appendix B: Background Technical Information
Date of Issue:
27th November 2020
Tender Deadline:
Friday 18th December at 16:00
Query Deadline:
Wednesday 9th December at 12:00 noon
Confidentiality:
Yes
Jurisdiction:
UK
Language:
English
Type of Document:
Tender Invitation
Sector:
Geothermal energy
Year:
2012
Organization:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE)
Document Type:
Form / Report
Region:
Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
Purpose:
Reporting drilling rig, workover rig, and coiled tubing or snubbing unit movements
OMB Control Number:
1014-0018
PRA Statement:
Responses are mandatory under 43 U.S.C. 1334
Contact Information:
BSEE District Offices (New Orleans, Houma, Lafayette, Lake Charles, Lake Jackson)
Form Version:
BSEE-0144 (March 2012)
Application:
Tracking rig arrivals and departures, well operations, and area clearance
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Big Rig / Semi Racing
Document Type:
Rules
Organ / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Participants in Big Rig / Semi Races
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Sailing techniques and sailboat rig tuning
Document Type:
Instructional guide
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Sailors operating the Megabyte Mark I sailboat
Applicable Period:
Current sailing conditions
Date of Publication:
2026
Boat Type:
Megabyte Mark I
Focus:
Sail trim, boat speed optimization, rig controls
Year:
2018
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Marine Warranty Surveyor (MWS) and offshore operations
Document Type:
Code of Practice
Organization:
Joint Natural Resources Committee (JNRC)
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Marine Warranty Surveyors, Underwriters, Assured
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
10 April 2018
Amendment Date:
3 September 2019, 24 February 2025
Year:
2003
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Crisis Management, Oil and Gas Industry
Document Type:
Government Briefing Pack
Agency / Organization:
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)
Author:
DECC
Target Audience:
Industry professionals, Government officials, Crisis management teams
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of last update:
Not specified
Year:
FY18/19
Region / City:
Multiple countries including Nigeria, Ghana, South Africa, Angola, and others
Topic:
Immigration enforcement, border security, capacity building
Document Type:
Project proposal
Organization / Institution:
Immigration Enforcement International
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Governments, law enforcement agencies, international partners
Implementation Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Genetic engineering, molecular biology
Document type:
Scientific publication
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Researchers in genetic engineering and biotechnology
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of modifications:
N/A
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
____
Region / City:
____
Topic:
Business Mergers
Document Type:
Announcement Letter
Organization / Institution:
XYZ Company
Author:
XYZ Company Partners and Associates
Target Audience:
Clients
Effective Period:
From January 1, ____
Approval Date:
____
Amendment Date:
____
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Ghana
Topic:
Upstream Petroleum Sector Registration
Document Type:
Registration Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Petroleum Commission
Author:
Petroleum Commission
Target Audience:
Petroleum Companies operating or intending to operate in Ghana
Period of Validity:
Annual renewal
Approval Date:
2020
Date of Last Amendment:
N/A
Expiry Date:
Anniversary of issuance
Note:
Year
Language:
English
Document Purpose:
Questionnaire for bio-processing, addressing product types and experimental details for cell culture and virus production processes.
Note:
Year
Contextual Description:
A document providing detailed examples of the classification of programme and support costs for humanitarian projects.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Year:
2002
Organization:
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Document Type:
Professional guideline
Topic:
Nutrition Care Process, PES Statements, Nutrition Diagnosis
Target Audience:
Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs)
Steps:
Nutrition Assessment, Nutrition Diagnosis, Nutrition Intervention, Nutrition Monitoring/Evaluation
PES Components:
Problem, Etiology, Signs and Symptoms
Classification:
Intake, Clinical, Behavioral
Examples Included:
Yes
References:
eatrightpro.org, andeal.org, jrnjournal.org
Version:
1.3
Note:
Document history
Version (date):
2018-04-04
Document version (date):
2018-04-04
Author:
Christoph Plasil, Jörg Dittmar, Mario Sattler, Bernd Birklhuber, Michael Brunsch, Olaf Willmann, Jan Gilissen, Jonas Roels
Organisation:
via donau; AT, BMVIT; AT, WSV; DE, ITZBund; DE, nv De Scheepvaart; BE
Authorised by:
NtS Expert Group
Source:
www.example.com
Subject:
Infoservice, Announcement
Validity period:
01.01.2016 – 20.04.2016
Date:
02.01.2016 – 20.02.2016
Object section:
River, Lock
Location:
Rhein (Gesamtstrecke), Elbe-Havel-Kanal, Donau
Period of limitation:
02.01.2016 – 20.02.2016
Interval:
Monday to Friday except public holidays
Kind of limitation:
Blockage
Reason of notice:
Repair
Communication means:
Internet
Contents:
Information about maintenance, repairs, and public holiday notices
Fairway section:
Rhein, Elbe-Havel-Kanal, Donau
Local name:
Rhein, Wusterwitz, Kachlet
Geo object:
Lock chamber, River
Start and end of affected section:
170.0 – 865.5