№ files_lp_4_process_1_38974
File format: docx
Character count: 49633
File size: 67 KB
This is a decision in a criminal case regarding the aggravated non-consensual distribution of intimate images, considering the impact of family violence, mental health conditions, and the circumstances surrounding the distribution of explicit material.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Topic:
Criminal Law, Sentencing, Distribution of Intimate Images, Family Violence
Document Type:
Court Decision
Institution:
Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Author:
Magistrate Temby
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students, Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
14 March 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Melbourne
Subject:
Criminal Law, Justice
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Organization / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
His Honour Judge Higham
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, law students, public
Effective Period:
2017
Approval Date:
16 June 2017
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Subject:
Criminal Law, Juvenile Justice, Sentencing
Document Type:
Court Case
Author:
Magistrate Stewart
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, public
Period of validity:
2025
Approval Date:
31 July 2025
Date of Changes:
Not stated
Court:
County Court of Victoria
Division:
Common Law Division
Registry:
Melbourne
Case Number:
CI-14-07978
Parties:
Savannah Maley (a pseudonym) v Oliver O’Shane (a pseudonym); Keith Williams Estate Agency Pty Limited (a pseudonym) (Third Party)
Judge:
His Honour Judge Brookes
Date of Hearing:
27, 28 and 31 July 2017; 1, 2, 3 and 4 August 2017
Date of Judgment:
4 August 2017
Medium Neutral Citation:
[2017] VCC 1996 (First revision 6 October 2017)
Subject:
Occupier’s liability
Legislation Cited:
Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic)
Type of Document:
Reasons for Judgment
Procedural Posture:
General List
Outcome:
Claim dismissed
Injury Date:
24 February 2013
Location of Incident:
White Court, Moligal
Medical Facility:
Latrobe Regional Hospital
Court:
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Citation:
[2025] ACTSC 89
Case Title:
DPP v Black (a pseudonym) (No 2)
Judge:
Taylor J
Hearing Dates:
11 September 2024; 5 February 2025
Decision Date:
18 March 2025
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown); Julius Black (Offender)
Jurisdiction:
Australian Capital Territory
Area of Law:
Criminal Law – Sentencing
Offences:
Sexual intercourse with a person under 10 years; Indecent assault on a female
Victims:
Three child victims (pseudonyms used)
Legislation Cited:
Crimes Act 1900 (ACT); Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)
File Numbers:
SCC 108 of 2023; SCC 271 of 2022
Representation:
K Musgrove (DPP); C Daly (DPP); T Jackson (Offender)
Solicitors:
ACT Director of Public Prosecutions; Legal Aid
Nature of Proceedings:
Sentencing following guilty pleas
Time Period of Offending:
1968–1994
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Geelong
Topic:
Criminal Law
Document Type:
Court Case Judgment
Organ / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Judge Hampel
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students
Period of Effect:
2017
Date of Approval:
30 June 2017
Date of Modifications:
None
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Melbourne
Subject:
Criminal law, cannabis cultivation
Document type:
Court ruling
Organization / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Judge Mullaly
Target audience:
Legal professionals, law students, criminal justice practitioners
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
10 October 2017
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2024
Jurisdiction:
Australian Capital Territory
Court:
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Case Number:
SCC 250 of 2023, SCC 31 of 2024
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown), Braiden Alfred (Offender)
Judges:
Burns AJ
Counsel:
E Wren (Crown), E Chen (Offender)
Solicitors:
ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, Legal Aid (Offender)
Hearing Date:
2 October 2024
Decision Dates:
30 October 2024, 15 November 2024
Legislation Cited:
Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT) s 133C
Previous Cases Cited:
Alfred (a pseudonym) v Eiffert [2023] ACTSC 403, R v Alfred [2022] ACTSC 216
Offences:
Aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, attempted theft, breach of suspended sentences
Context:
Court judgment detailing the sentencing of a defendant for both juvenile and adult offences including aggravated burglary and robbery, with reference to prior criminal history, juvenile circumstances, and rehabilitation prospects.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Subject:
Criminal Procedure, Plea Withdrawal
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Authority / Institution:
Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Author:
Magistrate Temby
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, defendants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
9 June 2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Subject:
Civil law, Consumer law, Contract law, Property defects
Document Type:
Legal decision
Institution:
Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Author:
Magistrate Temby
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, property owners, developers
Date of Approval:
28 March 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
South Australia
Subject:
Civil Jurisdiction, Court Applications
Document type:
Legal Application
Institution:
Court of South Australia
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, applicants, respondents
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2004
Region / City:
Western Australia
Theme:
Criminal Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Authority/Organization:
Magistrates Court of Western Australia
Author:
Western Australian Government
Target Audience:
Accused individuals involved in criminal proceedings
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Court Number
Amount the applicant is claiming:
$
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Civil Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Form
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal practitioners, defendants, plaintiffs
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Registry
Theme:
Civil procedure
Document type:
Legal form
Organization:
Magistrates Court of Western Australia
Target audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in a civil case
Note:
Registry
Year:
2016
Region:
United Kingdom
Type of document:
Government response to information request
Organization:
Ministry of Justice
Legal framework:
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Subjects:
Magistrates’ courts, Local Justice Areas, criminal justice statistics
Included courts:
Coventry, Ipswich, Leicester, Northampton, Wellingborough
Data format:
CSV
Data exclusions:
Swansea Magistrates’ Court, detailed sentence outcomes, detailed offence information
Date of request:
September 2016
Court Number:
____ OF VICTORIA AT ____ BETWEEN ____ Applicant OF ____ And ____ Respondent OF ____
Date of Document:
____
Filed on behalf of:
____
Australian lawyer name:
____
Code:
____
Address:
____
Telephone:
____
Reference:
____
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Civil procedure
Document type:
Legal form
Author:
Government of Victoria
Target audience:
Individuals involved in civil legal proceedings
Effective period:
From the date of filing
Approval date:
____
Modification date:
____
Year:
2020
Jurisdiction:
Victoria, Australia
Document Type:
Court Complaint Form
Parties:
Plaintiff and Defendant
Filing Date:
As indicated on the form
Lawyer:
Australian lawyer representing the plaintiff
Court Number:
As assigned on filing
Reference Number:
As indicated on the form
Related Law:
Civil Procedure Rules
Year:
1980
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Legal Procedure
Document Type:
Application Form
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Defendants, Prosecutors
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Author:
John GF Carey, PhD
Event:
Commonwealth Magistrates and Judges Association Virtual Conference
Date of presentation:
7 September 2021
Theme:
Digital footprints, judiciary, evidence and case management
Document type:
Conference presentation paper
Institutional context:
Papua New Guinea Judiciary
Related institutions:
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; Papua New Guinea Centre for Judicial Excellence; Council of Europe
Geographical references:
Papua New Guinea; Kosovo; Georgia, USA; Philadelphia, USA
Subject areas:
Judicial ethics; Cybercrime; Electronic evidence; Data management; Judicial education
Referenced publications:
Non-Binding Guidelines on the Use of Social Media by Judges (2018)
Referenced incidents:
Ransomware attack on the Papua New Guinea Judiciary (2019); Cyberattacks on courts in the United States (2019)