№ lp_1_2_69382
File format: docx
Character count: 2234
File size: 43 KB
Official government correspondence providing data on magistrates’ courts within specified Local Justice Areas in response to a Freedom of Information request.
Year:
2016
Region:
United Kingdom
Type of document:
Government response to information request
Organization:
Ministry of Justice
Legal framework:
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Subjects:
Magistrates’ courts, Local Justice Areas, criminal justice statistics
Included courts:
Coventry, Ipswich, Leicester, Northampton, Wellingborough
Data format:
CSV
Data exclusions:
Swansea Magistrates’ Court, detailed sentence outcomes, detailed offence information
Date of request:
September 2016
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Subject:
Criminal Procedure, Plea Withdrawal
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Authority / Institution:
Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Author:
Magistrate Temby
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, defendants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
9 June 2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Subject:
Civil law, Consumer law, Contract law, Property defects
Document Type:
Legal decision
Institution:
Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Author:
Magistrate Temby
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, property owners, developers
Date of Approval:
28 March 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
South Australia
Subject:
Civil Jurisdiction, Court Applications
Document type:
Legal Application
Institution:
Court of South Australia
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, applicants, respondents
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2004
Region / City:
Western Australia
Theme:
Criminal Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Authority/Organization:
Magistrates Court of Western Australia
Author:
Western Australian Government
Target Audience:
Accused individuals involved in criminal proceedings
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Court Number
Amount the applicant is claiming:
$
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Civil Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Form
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal practitioners, defendants, plaintiffs
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Registry
Theme:
Civil procedure
Document type:
Legal form
Organization:
Magistrates Court of Western Australia
Target audience:
Legal professionals, parties involved in a civil case
Note:
Registry
Court Number:
____ OF VICTORIA AT ____ BETWEEN ____ Applicant OF ____ And ____ Respondent OF ____
Date of Document:
____
Filed on behalf of:
____
Australian lawyer name:
____
Code:
____
Address:
____
Telephone:
____
Reference:
____
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Civil procedure
Document type:
Legal form
Author:
Government of Victoria
Target audience:
Individuals involved in civil legal proceedings
Effective period:
From the date of filing
Approval date:
____
Modification date:
____
Year:
2020
Jurisdiction:
Victoria, Australia
Document Type:
Court Complaint Form
Parties:
Plaintiff and Defendant
Filing Date:
As indicated on the form
Lawyer:
Australian lawyer representing the plaintiff
Court Number:
As assigned on filing
Reference Number:
As indicated on the form
Related Law:
Civil Procedure Rules
Year:
1980
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Legal Procedure
Document Type:
Application Form
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Defendants, Prosecutors
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Author:
John GF Carey, PhD
Event:
Commonwealth Magistrates and Judges Association Virtual Conference
Date of presentation:
7 September 2021
Theme:
Digital footprints, judiciary, evidence and case management
Document type:
Conference presentation paper
Institutional context:
Papua New Guinea Judiciary
Related institutions:
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; Papua New Guinea Centre for Judicial Excellence; Council of Europe
Geographical references:
Papua New Guinea; Kosovo; Georgia, USA; Philadelphia, USA
Subject areas:
Judicial ethics; Cybercrime; Electronic evidence; Data management; Judicial education
Referenced publications:
Non-Binding Guidelines on the Use of Social Media by Judges (2018)
Referenced incidents:
Ransomware attack on the Papua New Guinea Judiciary (2019); Cyberattacks on courts in the United States (2019)
Jurisdiction:
Magistrates / Youth Court of South Australia – Special Statutory Jurisdiction
Type of document:
Court application form
Subject matter:
Variation or revocation of Intervention Order / Problem Gambling Family Protection Order
Legislation:
Intervention Orders (Prevention of Abuse) Act 2009
Relevant legislation:
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Note:
Relevant legislation
Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017
Parties:
Applicant and Respondent
Grounds:
As set out in accompanying Affidavit or stated in numbered paragraphs
Urgency:
Provision for urgent application if applicable
Accompanying documents:
Supporting Affidavit; copies of relevant orders, agreements, pending applications or contact determinations
Service requirement:
Service on all parties in accordance with the Rules of Court
Year:
2020
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Records retention and disposition policies
Document Type:
Policy Schedule
Organization / Institution:
Ministry of Justice
Author:
Phillip Crowcroft
Target Audience:
Staff within the Ministry of Justice and associated bodies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
22 July 2020
Date of Changes:
July 2015 (Previous update)
Jurisdiction:
Resident Magistrates’ Courts
Subject Matter:
Boundary disputes and related land disputes
Legal Framework:
Judicature (Resident Magistrates) Act, Section 97
Related Provisions:
Section 98; Section 101; Section 104 of Law 28 of 1904 (now Section 101 of Cap 179); Law 39 of 1927, Section 102
Procedure Type:
Special statutory proceedings
Key Legal Concepts:
Boundary plaint; question of title; reference to surveyor; easements; rights of way
Judicial Authorities Cited:
Whitelocke vs. Campbell (1970) 12 J.L.R. 67; Cox v. Shields (1909) 9 S.C.J.B. 89; 1 Stephens Reports 352; McNish v. Murray (1924) Adrian Clark’s Reports 161; Holmes v. Ricketts (1879) 2 Stephens’ Reports
Court Officers Involved:
Resident Magistrate; Parish Judge; Commissioned Surveyor
Nature of Proceedings:
Civil proceedings concerning adjoining lands
Scope of Application:
Disputes concerning boundary lines, rights of way, water rights, and other easements affecting land
Year:
2024
Event date:
23 October 2024
Event type:
Judicial training event
Subject matter:
Transparency in family court proceedings
Legal framework referenced:
Administration of Justice Act 1960; Children Act 1989; Family Procedure Rules 2010
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Court context:
Family Court and High Court (Family Division)
Author / speaker:
His Honour Judge Talbott
Organising body:
Sussex Family Justice Board
Intended audience:
Judges, advocates, legal professionals, journalists and legal bloggers
Document type:
Training presentation and guidance notes
Related initiatives:
Family Court Transparency Pilot
Includes annex:
Template Transparency Order
Judicial guidance cited:
Practice Guidance on Publication of Judgments (19 June 2024)
Case law referenced:
Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882; Tickle v Herefordshire CC [2022] EWHC 1017; Hannah Summers & Anor v White & Ors [2024] EWFC 182
Publication date:
September 2022
Legislation:
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022
Document type:
FAQ
Issuing authority:
Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service
Target audience:
Youth Offending Teams (YOTs)
Related guidance:
Youth Justice Board Case Management Guidance
Scope:
Custodial sentencing, detention orders, community sentencing, electronic monitoring, youth rehabilitation orders
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Year:
2022
Region / City:
England and Wales, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle
Topic:
Legal Practice Direction, Disclosure
Document Type:
Practice Direction
Authority / Institution:
Business and Property Courts
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Court personnel
Period of validity:
From 1 October 2022
Approval Date:
1 October 2022
Date of last modification:
Not specified
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
Singapore
Theme:
Divorce, Family Law
Document Type:
Legal Form
Agency / Organization:
Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Defendants in divorce cases
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Ontario
Topic:
Judicial conduct
Document Type:
Legal Decision
Organization / Institution:
Ontario Judicial Council
Author:
Ontario Judicial Council
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, judicial members, and the public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context description:
This is a legal decision regarding the judicial conduct of Justice Donald McLeod, following a complaint to the Ontario Judicial Council concerning his involvement with the Federation of Black Canadians.