№ lp_1_2_66902
File format: docx
Character count: 19835
File size: 30 KB
This document is a court judgment detailing the sentencing of Harrison Cookson for attempting to pervert the course of justice, including the context and legal reasoning behind the decision.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Melbourne
Subject:
Criminal Law, Justice
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Organization / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
His Honour Judge Higham
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, law students, public
Effective Period:
2017
Approval Date:
16 June 2017
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Preston
Topic:
Personal memories, childhood, sports, school life
Document Type:
Interview
Organization:
UCLan
Author:
Magdalen Cookson
Target Audience:
General
Period of Action:
1951-1953
Approval Date:
29 February 2024
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Country:
South Africa
City:
Pretoria
Legislation Referenced:
National Prosecuting Authority Act 32 of 1998; Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Type of Document:
Procedural rules
Subject:
Fitness of Advocate Andrew Chauke to hold the office of Director of Public Prosecutions
Institution:
National Prosecuting Authority
Enquiry Established By:
Presidential Minute No. 211/2025 dated 19 September 2025
Government Gazette:
No. R.6686 of 30 September 2025
Chairperson:
Baaitse Elizabeth (“Bess") Nkabinde
Panel Members:
Adv Baloyi-Mere SC; Ms. Matshego Ramagaga
National Director of Public Prosecutions:
Adv Shamila Batohi
Evidence Leaders:
Adv Mmotse David Mohlamonyane SC; Ms. Pertunia Thulare-Sebone
Secretary:
Adv Phuti Setati
Spokesperson:
Mr Max Mpuzana
Venue:
SALU Building, 28th Floor, 316 Thabo Sehume Street, Pretoria
Date Signed:
27 October 2025
Commencement Date:
19 September 2025
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Johannesburg
Subject:
Legal Judgment
Document Type:
Court Ruling
Institution:
High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division
Author:
B.C. Wanless
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, judges, and legal entities
Period of Action:
2022-2023
Date of Approval:
12 June 2023
Date of Changes:
None
Contextual Description:
Legal judgment concerning an application for rescission of a court order, involving the South African Police Service and the National Prosecution Authority against Zolani Kali.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Limpopo
Subject:
Criminal law, Rape
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Institution:
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
Author:
Hughes JA, Mabindla-Boqwana, Meyer JJA
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, judicial authorities
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
12 December 2024
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Canada
Topic:
Systemic Racism, Wrongful Convictions, Bias, Criminal Justice
Document Type:
Report, Webinar Resources
Organ / Institution:
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Heads of Prosecutions Committee
Author:
Bruce MacFarlane, Joshua Sealy-Harrington, Reakash Walters, Anthony Morgan, Lorna Fadden, Amanda Carling, Kenneth Jackson
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students, Criminal Justice Reform Advocates
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
December 10, 2020
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A report and webinar resources detailing systemic racism, biases, and their impact on wrongful convictions, with contributions from multiple legal professionals and experts.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Geelong
Topic:
Criminal Law
Document Type:
Court Case Judgment
Organ / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Judge Hampel
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students
Period of Effect:
2017
Date of Approval:
30 June 2017
Date of Modifications:
None
Case Name:
Director of Public Prosecutions v P
Court:
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Decision Date:
27 April 2007
Citation:
[2007] EWHC 946 (Admin)
Subject Matter:
Criminal law; capacity; fitness to plead; doli incapax
Legislation Considered:
Crime and Disorder Act 1998; Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964; Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000; Mental Health Act 1983
Related Case Law:
SC v United Kingdom; R (TP) v West London Youth Court
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions; P (a minor)
Procedural History:
Appeal by way of case stated from the youth court
Key Issues:
Abolition of the rebuttable presumption of doli incapax; effective participation in trial; abuse of process; capacity to distinguish serious wrongdoing
Type of Document:
Judicial commentary and case analysis
Legal Context:
Youth justice; criminal responsibility of children aged 10–13
Referenced Offences:
Kidnapping; false imprisonment; indecent assault; assault; theft of a car
Case name:
R (on the application of the Director of Public Prosecutions) v Manchester Magistrates’ Court and Ruth Wood and Radical Haslam (Interested Parties)
Court:
High Court of England and Wales
Judges:
Lord Justice Popplewell; Mr Justice Fordham
Date of judgment:
21 November 2023
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Type of document:
Summary of judgment produced by counsel for the Interested Parties
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions; Manchester Magistrates’ Court; Ruth Wood; Radical Haslam
Legal basis:
Public Order Act 1986, s.4A; European Convention on Human Rights, Articles 10 and 11
Related proceedings:
Trial at Manchester Magistrates’ Court (15 November 2022); refusal to state a case (5 December 2022); judicial review proceedings (launched 27 February 2023)
Subject matter:
Freedom of expression and association; proportionality; burden and standard of proof; judicial review of acquittal and refusal to state a case
Outcome:
Claim for judicial review dismissed on all grounds
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Subject:
Criminal Law, Juvenile Justice, Sentencing
Document Type:
Court Case
Author:
Magistrate Stewart
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, public
Period of validity:
2025
Approval Date:
31 July 2025
Date of Changes:
Not stated
Court:
County Court of Victoria
Division:
Common Law Division
Registry:
Melbourne
Case Number:
CI-14-07978
Parties:
Savannah Maley (a pseudonym) v Oliver O’Shane (a pseudonym); Keith Williams Estate Agency Pty Limited (a pseudonym) (Third Party)
Judge:
His Honour Judge Brookes
Date of Hearing:
27, 28 and 31 July 2017; 1, 2, 3 and 4 August 2017
Date of Judgment:
4 August 2017
Medium Neutral Citation:
[2017] VCC 1996 (First revision 6 October 2017)
Subject:
Occupier’s liability
Legislation Cited:
Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic)
Type of Document:
Reasons for Judgment
Procedural Posture:
General List
Outcome:
Claim dismissed
Injury Date:
24 February 2013
Location of Incident:
White Court, Moligal
Medical Facility:
Latrobe Regional Hospital
Court:
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Citation:
[2025] ACTSC 89
Case Title:
DPP v Black (a pseudonym) (No 2)
Judge:
Taylor J
Hearing Dates:
11 September 2024; 5 February 2025
Decision Date:
18 March 2025
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown); Julius Black (Offender)
Jurisdiction:
Australian Capital Territory
Area of Law:
Criminal Law – Sentencing
Offences:
Sexual intercourse with a person under 10 years; Indecent assault on a female
Victims:
Three child victims (pseudonyms used)
Legislation Cited:
Crimes Act 1900 (ACT); Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)
File Numbers:
SCC 108 of 2023; SCC 271 of 2022
Representation:
K Musgrove (DPP); C Daly (DPP); T Jackson (Offender)
Solicitors:
ACT Director of Public Prosecutions; Legal Aid
Nature of Proceedings:
Sentencing following guilty pleas
Time Period of Offending:
1968–1994
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Geelong
Topic:
Criminal Law
Document Type:
Court Case Judgment
Organ / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Judge Hampel
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students
Period of Effect:
2017
Date of Approval:
30 June 2017
Date of Modifications:
None
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Melbourne
Subject:
Criminal law, cannabis cultivation
Document type:
Court ruling
Organization / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Judge Mullaly
Target audience:
Legal professionals, law students, criminal justice practitioners
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
10 October 2017
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australian Capital Territory
Topic:
Criminal Law, Sentencing, Distribution of Intimate Images, Family Violence
Document Type:
Court Decision
Institution:
Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Author:
Magistrate Temby
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students, Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
14 March 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Jurisdiction:
Australian Capital Territory
Court:
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Case Number:
SCC 250 of 2023, SCC 31 of 2024
Parties:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown), Braiden Alfred (Offender)
Judges:
Burns AJ
Counsel:
E Wren (Crown), E Chen (Offender)
Solicitors:
ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, Legal Aid (Offender)
Hearing Date:
2 October 2024
Decision Dates:
30 October 2024, 15 November 2024
Legislation Cited:
Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT) s 133C
Previous Cases Cited:
Alfred (a pseudonym) v Eiffert [2023] ACTSC 403, R v Alfred [2022] ACTSC 216
Offences:
Aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, attempted theft, breach of suspended sentences
Context:
Court judgment detailing the sentencing of a defendant for both juvenile and adult offences including aggravated burglary and robbery, with reference to prior criminal history, juvenile circumstances, and rehabilitation prospects.