№ files_lp_3_process_7_098816
File format: docx
Character count: 6872
File size: 124 KB
Term-based cycling class schedule issued by U3A Knox Inc outlining weekly ride dates, routes, distances, leadership assignments, safety requirements, participation conditions and organisational policies for Term 1 and the subsequent term break of 2023.
Year:
2023
Term:
Term 1 and Term 1 Break
Organisation:
U3A Knox Inc
Program Type:
Cycling class schedule
Region:
Knox, Victoria, Australia
Class Leader:
Heinz Herrmann
Safety Representative:
Gordon Smith
First Aider:
Mary Lewis
Start Time:
8:30am
Locations:
Boronia, Jells Park, Ringwood, Hastings, Braeside Park, Mount Waverley and surrounding areas
Distance Range:
Approximately 35–50 km
Difficulty Levels:
Easy (E), Medium (M), Difficult (D)
Transport:
Bicycle and occasional train travel (MYKI required)
Policy Reference:
Policy, Emergency and General Procedures for all Cycling Classes
Temperature Policy:
Modified at 30–34°C; cancelled above 34°C
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Coquitlam
Topic:
Request for Quotation
Document Type:
Form
Author:
City of Coquitlam
Target Audience:
Potential contractors and vendors
Period of Validity:
Until award of contract
Approval Date:
August 18, 2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Theme:
Compressed air drying system
Document type:
Product specification
Target audience:
Engineers, manufacturers, and service technicians in the field of compressed air systems
Note:
Year
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Glasgow
Topic:
Active travel, cycling, walking, mobility
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Glasgow City Council, Sustrans
Author:
Glasgow City Council, Sustrans
Target Audience:
General public, policymakers, urban planners, residents of Glasgow
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
March 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Refrigeration, Compressed Air Systems, Air Drying
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Target Audience:
Engineers, Manufacturers, Technicians
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Refrigeration, Air Drying Systems
Document Type:
Product Specification
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Engineers, Technical Personnel
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Description:
This document specifies a mechanical refrigerated air drying system, detailing components, features, and technical specifications for the efficient removal of moisture and contaminants from compressed air systems.
Document Type:
Template constitution
Subject:
Governance of a cycling club
Sport:
Cycling
Affiliation:
Cycling Ireland
Governing Body:
Cycling Ireland
Organisational Structure:
Management Committee with elected officers
Membership Categories:
Leisure; Competitive; Supporter
Financial Provisions:
Annual accounts; Treasurer responsibility; Audited statement presented at AGM
Meetings:
Annual General Meeting (AGM); Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM); Management Committee meetings
Policies Included:
Safeguarding Children; Equity Policy; Discipline and Appeals
Disciplinary Authority:
Management Committee
Amendment Procedure:
Majority vote at AGM or EGM
Dissolution Clause:
Assets transferred to Cycling Ireland or a club with similar objectives
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Felixstowe
Subject:
Cycling Regulations
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
Felixstowe Town Council, Suffolk Coastal District Council
Author:
Felixstowe Forward
Target Audience:
Local Residents
Date of Approval:
May 2016
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Theme:
Cyclocross Racing
Document Type:
Event Information
Organizer:
West Coast Cycling, Red Truck Racing
Author:
Ian Parker
Target Audience:
Cyclocross enthusiasts, athletes, and spectators
Period of Validity:
September 21st, 2025
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Event Date:
September 21st, 2025
Event Type:
Cyclocross Race
Registration Deadline:
September 20th, 6:00 PM
Registration Fees:
$60.00 for Adults, $30.00 for Youths
License Required:
Yes
Weather Contingencies:
Event cancellation possible due to weather
Refund Policy:
Entry fee refunded (minus processing fee) if event is cancelled
Technical Document:
Vanier Tech Document
URL for Results:
https://results.wimsey.co/2025/
Age Categories:
U13, U15, U17, U19
One-Day License:
$25 for adults, $5 for youth
Numbers and Chips:
Required for race participation
Registration Confirmation:
Starts at 8:30 AM
Event Regulations:
Participants race within their ability category
Context:
Event information and registration details for the 2025 Vanier Park cyclocross race, including entry fees, weather contingencies, and registration procedures.
Year:
2022–2023
Region / City:
New South Wales, Australia
Event Type:
Track Cycling Competitions
Organizer:
AusCycling NSW
Document Type:
Commissaire Appointment Schedule
Roles:
PCP, Reserve Commissaires
Event Dates:
Nov 19th 2022 – Mar 19th 2023
Included Championships:
U9–U13, U15–U18, Elite & Para, Masters
Additional EOI Instructions:
Provided for post-appointment submissions
Target Audience:
Cycling commissaires and event organizers
Events Covered:
Tamworth Track Carnival, Central West Track Open, GP Sprint Rd 2 & 3, Shimano Sydney Thousand, Illawarra Track Open, Goulburn Track Carnival, Bowral Cup, Trek Sydney Cup
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
BiSn-Based Low-Temperature Soldering Process
Document Type:
Project Statement
Organization / Institution:
INEMI
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Participating INEMI members
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
February 18, 2025
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Project Budget:
US$1,000 per company
Task Distribution:
Participating companies will allocate 8 hours per month
Intellectual Property:
Disclosures required by INEMI Intellectual Property Policy
Data Access:
Restricted to project participants
Note:
Document Type
Project Statement for INEMI project
Form Reference:
FORM OV 4
Document Type:
Risk Assessment Form
Activity:
Offsite Visits – Cycling
Scope:
Road Cycling and Off-Road / Mountain Biking
Purpose:
Identification of hazards and control measures for cycling visits
Establishment:
To be completed by establishment
Visit Leader:
To be specified
Activity Leader:
To be specified
Assessment by:
To be specified
Approval:
Approved by designated person (position to be specified)
Relevant Guidance:
HCC Policy for the Management of LOtC and Offsite Visits (Section 16 – Good Practice Requirements)
Referenced Awards:
British Cycling Ride Leadership Award; UK Coaching 1st4sport Level 2 Award in Instructing Cycle Training; Cycling UK Group Leader Award; British Schools Cycling Association Off Road Leader Award; MIAS Level 1–3 Awards; Cycling UK Mountain Bike Trail Leader Award; British Cycling Mountain Bike Leader Awards
Supervision Ratio:
1:8 (maximum group size 12 plus supervisors)
Key Risk Areas:
Leadership competence; participant inexperience; separation from group; equipment safety; traffic hazards; unsuitable terrain; public interaction; emergencies; weather conditions
Control Measures:
Defined leadership roles; competence checks; route planning; equipment inspection; structured supervision; participant briefings; emergency procedures; alternative plans (Plan B); Late Back arrangements
Reference number:
FOI 3889
Date:
29/05/2025
Organisation:
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sites covered:
Bedford site; Luton site
Type of document:
Freedom of Information response
Legislation:
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Subject:
A&E admissions related to cycling accidents
Years covered:
2022–2024
Data provided:
Number of patients admitted to A&E following a bike accident (2022: 145; 2023: 378; 2024: 570)
Data not recorded:
Cycling accidents caused by potholes; overnight stays following pothole-related accidents; fatalities related to pothole accidents
Intellectual property notice:
Subject to Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015
Internal review contact:
Information Governance Manager/Data Protection Officer
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Knox
Topic:
Cycling Program
Document Type:
Program Schedule
Organization / Institution:
U3A Knox
Author:
Martien Pruysers
Target Audience:
U3A Members
Period of Validity:
Term 2, 2023
Approval Date:
Not provided
Modification Date:
Not provided
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Topic:
Adaptive Cycling, Transportation
Document Type:
Grant Proposal Request
Agency / Organization:
District Department of Transportation (DDOT)
Author:
District Department of Transportation (DDOT)
Target Audience:
Non-profit cycling, education, and disability organizations
Effective Period:
From proposal submission deadline (October 8, 2021) to grant expiration (September 30, 2022)
Approval Date:
August 2021
Amendments Date:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
North Karanpura
Theme:
Price breakdown for construction and engineering services
Document Type:
Contract / Tender
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and service providers in the construction and engineering field
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2007
Region / city:
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales
Subject:
Adoption, Fostering, Health Assessment
Document type:
Health Report
Organization:
Agency responsible for adoption and fostering
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Prospective adoptive parents, foster carers, GP
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None