№ files_lp_3_process_7_033421
File format: docx
Character count: 2052
File size: 18 KB
Year:
2019
Version:
October 2019
Region / city:
London
Subject:
Cochrane Intervention Reviews
Document type:
Methodological guideline
Author:
Higgins JPT, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Thomas J, Flemyng E, Churchill R
Target audience:
Researchers, clinicians, policy-makers
Date of approval:
October 2019
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context:
A methodological guideline for conducting Cochrane intervention reviews, providing detailed instructions for searching and selecting studies for inclusion.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2019
Note:
Region / city
Topic:
Risk of bias assessment, randomized trials
Document type:
Template
Organization / institution:
Cochrane Collaboration
Author:
Julian PT Higgins, Jelena Savović, Matthew J Page, Jonathan AC Sterne
Target audience:
Researchers, clinicians, trialists
Year:
2016
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Narrative synthesis in systematic reviews
Document type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Providers
Period of Effect:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
The document outlines various approaches to narrative synthesis used in systematic reviews, with specific examples from Cochrane reviews.
Organization:
Cochrane Review Group
Document type:
Methodological guidance
Subject:
Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) in Cochrane intervention reviews
Author:
Ella Flemyng
Author role:
Methods Implementation Manager
Document version:
V3
Document created:
December 2020
Last updated:
March 2021
Version history:
V1 released December 2020; V2 updated links and data options; V3 updated availability of detailed risk of bias data
Intended users:
Cochrane review authors and editorial teams
Contact:
[email protected]
Status:
Draft
Year:
2011
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Systematic reviews, Qualitative research
Document type:
Protocol
Organization / Institution:
Cochrane
Author:
Higgins and Green
Target audience:
Researchers, Review teams
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Document type:
Editorial and production workflow form
Purpose:
Logging copy edit changes, queries, and proofing comments during manuscript production
Related organization:
Cochrane
Production service:
Cochrane Central Production Service
Applies to:
Cochrane review manuscripts and protocols
Sections covered:
Protocol information; Title; Background; Objectives; Methods; References; Tables; Figures; Appendices; Additional information; Dates and events
Editorial roles:
Copy Editor; Final proofreader; Authors; Managing Editor
Language variants referenced:
UK English (-ize endings); UK English (-ise endings); US English
Workflow stages:
Copy editing; Final proofread; Author review of comments
Required checks:
Author byline verification; What’s New events validation
Communication contact:
[email protected]
Year:
2021
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Hepatology, Systematic Reviews
Document Type:
Systematic Review
Organization / Institution:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers, clinicians
Organization:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Review Group
Document type:
Editorial process guidelines
Subject area:
Hepato-biliary systematic reviews and protocols
Applies to:
Authors submitting protocols and reviews
Editorial roles mentioned:
Managing Editor; Trials Search Co-ordinator; Contact Editor; Co-ordinating Editor; CHBG Editors; External peer reviewers; Statistician
Managing Editor:
Dimitrinka Nikolova
Trials Search Co-ordinator:
Sarah Klinkenberg
Co-ordinating Editor:
Christian Gluud
Key processes:
Internal review; Statistical review; External peer review; Copy-editing; Permission to publish; Declaration of interest verification
Submission requirements:
Completed checklist; Data extraction forms (for reviews); Signed permission to publish form; Updated declaration of interest confirmation
Review timelines:
Approximately four weeks for internal comments on time submissions; up to three weeks for resubmission; about one month for external peer review feedback
Source reference:
CHBG Module and CHBG website
Publication year:
2023
Organization:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG)
Database:
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Library:
Cochrane Library
Content types:
Reviews; Protocols
Subject area:
Hepatology; Biliary diseases; Liver transplantation; Chronic liver disease; Hepatitis B; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Editorial structure:
Sign-off Editors; Contact Editors; Statistical Editors; Managing Editors; Information Specialists; Copy Editors
Peer review:
External peer reviewers; Methods peer reviewers; Evidence Synthesis Development Editors
Geographical scope of contributors:
Denmark; UK; USA; Italy; Serbia; Canada; Russia; Australia; Ethiopia; China; Japan; India; Croatia; the Netherlands
Document status:
Published reviews; Registered protocols; Waiting publication
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Belgium
Topic:
Systematic Reviews, Clinical Research
Document Type:
Course Schedule
Organization:
Cochrane Belgium
Author:
Cochrane Belgium
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Professionals, Clinicians
Start Date:
2023-01-01
End Date:
2023-01-03
Date of Approval:
2023-01-01
Date of Revisions:
None
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2022
Version:
1
Authors:
Nicole Pitcher, Denise Mitchell, Carolyn Hughes
Document type:
Template
Target audience:
Authors writing Plain Language Summaries for Cochrane reviews
Keywords:
Cochrane, Plain Language Summary, template, research, writing
Purpose:
Provide a structure for writing a Plain Language Summary for Cochrane reviews
Year:
2024
Organization:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG)
Type of Document:
Systematic review listings
Database:
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)
Articles Included:
6
Review Topics:
Hepatorenal syndrome, deep neuromuscular blockade, gallstone disease, leptospirosis, biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Editors:
Christian Gluud, Brian Davidson
Managing Editors:
Dimitrinka Nikolova
Information Specialists:
Sarah Louise Klingenberg
Peer Reviewers:
International clinical and consumer reviewers from multiple countries
Publication Format:
Issue-based articles in Cochrane Library
DOI References:
Provided for each review
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Addis Ababa
Theme:
Energy Statistics
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Organ / Institution:
African Energy Commission (AFREC)
Author:
African Union
Target Audience:
Consultancy Firms or Consultants
Period of Implementation:
Not specified
Approval Date:
24th June 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency / Organization:
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
Author:
Environmental Accounting Services
Target Audience:
Government, environmental agencies, industry stakeholders
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Canberra
Topic:
Greenhouse gas emissions estimation, agriculture, fisheries, and forestry
Document Type:
Guidelines
Institution:
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
Author:
DCCEEW (Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water)
Target Audience:
Agricultural, fisheries, and forestry professionals, environmental researchers
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
February 2025
Date of Revisions:
Not indicated
Intellectual Property Rights:
Commonwealth of Australia owns copyright and other intellectual property rights
Acknowledgments:
Environmental Accounting Services for drafting, Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Estimation and Reporting Standards Reference Group for contributions
Creative Commons License:
CC BY 4.0
Contact Information:
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, GPO Box 3090, Canberra ACT 2601, Telephone 1800 920 528
Disclaimer:
Liability for any damages or loss related to the document is disclaimed
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Canberra, Australia
Topic:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation
Document Type:
Draft Guidelines
Agency / Institution:
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
Author:
Environmental Accounting Services, Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Estimation and Reporting Standards Reference Group
Target Audience:
Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry industries, producers, advisors, decision-makers
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
February 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Medicare Advantage, Medicare Part D, Payment Methodology, Healthcare
Document Type:
Government Notice
Organization / Institution:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Author:
CMS
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers, policy makers, Medicare stakeholders
Effective Period:
CY 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Supplementary materials
Associated article:
Being really confidently wrong: Qualitative researchers’ experiences of methodological incongruent peer review feedback
Contents:
Note 1; Note 2; Note 3; Table 1
Primary focus:
Methodological congruence in Big Q Qualitative research
Number of listed practices:
Twenty
Intended audience:
Authors, reviewers and editors
Key concepts:
Big Q Qualitative research; ontology; epistemology; methodology; reflexivity; peer review
Structure:
Explanatory notes with references to relevant literature
Year:
2017–2018
Region / City:
Odessa
Topic:
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Document Type:
Methodological Recommendations
Institution:
Odessa National Medical University
Author:
A.A. Zelinsky
Target Audience:
Medical students
Period of validity:
2017–2018
Approval Date:
August 29, 2017
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Program:
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)
Framework Reference:
FCPF Methodological Framework (Criterion 29–33)
Agreement:
Emission Reductions Payment Agreement (ERPA)
Report Type:
BSP Implementation Status Report
Purpose:
Reporting on implementation of the Benefit-Sharing Plan (BSP)
Reporting Frequency:
Six months after first payment and annually thereafter
Submitting Entity:
Program Entity (PE)
Content Scope:
Fund disbursement, governance arrangements, grievance mechanisms, beneficiary distribution, financial management, monitoring and verification
Annex Requirements:
Supporting documentation, stakeholder consultations, detailed financial tables
Data Requirements:
Monetary and non-monetary benefit distribution disaggregated by beneficiary type, gender, and geographic location
Compliance Basis:
National laws and legally binding international obligations
Validation Condition:
Completion of all core sections using the prescribed template
Year:
2017
Date:
16 March 2017
Document Identifier:
IMDRF/Registry WG/N42FINAL:2017
Issuing Organization:
International Medical Device Regulators Forum
Authoring Group:
IMDRF Patient Registries Working Group
Document Type:
Final Document
Subject:
International medical device registry data
Focus:
Clinical evaluation of performance, effectiveness and safety across the device lifecycle
Scope:
International coordination in methodology and signal detection via international Coordinated Registry Networks (iCRNs)
Target Audience:
Medical device regulators and international stakeholders
Copyright:
© 2017 International Medical Device Regulators Forum
Language:
English