№ lp_2_1_28165
File format: docx
Character count: 4433
File size: 31 KB
Editorial production form used in the copy editing and proofing stages of a Cochrane review manuscript to record stylistic decisions, comments, queries, and author responses across all sections of the review.
Document type:
Editorial and production workflow form
Purpose:
Logging copy edit changes, queries, and proofing comments during manuscript production
Related organization:
Cochrane
Production service:
Cochrane Central Production Service
Applies to:
Cochrane review manuscripts and protocols
Sections covered:
Protocol information; Title; Background; Objectives; Methods; References; Tables; Figures; Appendices; Additional information; Dates and events
Editorial roles:
Copy Editor; Final proofreader; Authors; Managing Editor
Language variants referenced:
UK English (-ize endings); UK English (-ise endings); US English
Workflow stages:
Copy editing; Final proofread; Author review of comments
Required checks:
Author byline verification; What’s New events validation
Communication contact:
[email protected]
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2019
Note:
Region / city
Topic:
Risk of bias assessment, randomized trials
Document type:
Template
Organization / institution:
Cochrane Collaboration
Author:
Julian PT Higgins, Jelena Savović, Matthew J Page, Jonathan AC Sterne
Target audience:
Researchers, clinicians, trialists
Year:
2016
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Narrative synthesis in systematic reviews
Document type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Providers
Period of Effect:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
The document outlines various approaches to narrative synthesis used in systematic reviews, with specific examples from Cochrane reviews.
Organization:
Cochrane Review Group
Document type:
Methodological guidance
Subject:
Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) in Cochrane intervention reviews
Author:
Ella Flemyng
Author role:
Methods Implementation Manager
Document version:
V3
Document created:
December 2020
Last updated:
March 2021
Version history:
V1 released December 2020; V2 updated links and data options; V3 updated availability of detailed risk of bias data
Intended users:
Cochrane review authors and editorial teams
Contact:
[email protected]
Status:
Draft
Year:
2011
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Systematic reviews, Qualitative research
Document type:
Protocol
Organization / Institution:
Cochrane
Author:
Higgins and Green
Target audience:
Researchers, Review teams
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Version:
October 2019
Region / city:
London
Subject:
Cochrane Intervention Reviews
Document type:
Methodological guideline
Author:
Higgins JPT, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Thomas J, Flemyng E, Churchill R
Target audience:
Researchers, clinicians, policy-makers
Date of approval:
October 2019
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context:
A methodological guideline for conducting Cochrane intervention reviews, providing detailed instructions for searching and selecting studies for inclusion.
Year:
2021
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Hepatology, Systematic Reviews
Document Type:
Systematic Review
Organization / Institution:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers, clinicians
Organization:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Review Group
Document type:
Editorial process guidelines
Subject area:
Hepato-biliary systematic reviews and protocols
Applies to:
Authors submitting protocols and reviews
Editorial roles mentioned:
Managing Editor; Trials Search Co-ordinator; Contact Editor; Co-ordinating Editor; CHBG Editors; External peer reviewers; Statistician
Managing Editor:
Dimitrinka Nikolova
Trials Search Co-ordinator:
Sarah Klinkenberg
Co-ordinating Editor:
Christian Gluud
Key processes:
Internal review; Statistical review; External peer review; Copy-editing; Permission to publish; Declaration of interest verification
Submission requirements:
Completed checklist; Data extraction forms (for reviews); Signed permission to publish form; Updated declaration of interest confirmation
Review timelines:
Approximately four weeks for internal comments on time submissions; up to three weeks for resubmission; about one month for external peer review feedback
Source reference:
CHBG Module and CHBG website
Publication year:
2023
Organization:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG)
Database:
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Library:
Cochrane Library
Content types:
Reviews; Protocols
Subject area:
Hepatology; Biliary diseases; Liver transplantation; Chronic liver disease; Hepatitis B; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Editorial structure:
Sign-off Editors; Contact Editors; Statistical Editors; Managing Editors; Information Specialists; Copy Editors
Peer review:
External peer reviewers; Methods peer reviewers; Evidence Synthesis Development Editors
Geographical scope of contributors:
Denmark; UK; USA; Italy; Serbia; Canada; Russia; Australia; Ethiopia; China; Japan; India; Croatia; the Netherlands
Document status:
Published reviews; Registered protocols; Waiting publication
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Belgium
Topic:
Systematic Reviews, Clinical Research
Document Type:
Course Schedule
Organization:
Cochrane Belgium
Author:
Cochrane Belgium
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Professionals, Clinicians
Start Date:
2023-01-01
End Date:
2023-01-03
Date of Approval:
2023-01-01
Date of Revisions:
None
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2022
Version:
1
Authors:
Nicole Pitcher, Denise Mitchell, Carolyn Hughes
Document type:
Template
Target audience:
Authors writing Plain Language Summaries for Cochrane reviews
Keywords:
Cochrane, Plain Language Summary, template, research, writing
Purpose:
Provide a structure for writing a Plain Language Summary for Cochrane reviews
Year:
2024
Organization:
Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG)
Type of Document:
Systematic review listings
Database:
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)
Articles Included:
6
Review Topics:
Hepatorenal syndrome, deep neuromuscular blockade, gallstone disease, leptospirosis, biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
Editors:
Christian Gluud, Brian Davidson
Managing Editors:
Dimitrinka Nikolova
Information Specialists:
Sarah Louise Klingenberg
Peer Reviewers:
International clinical and consumer reviewers from multiple countries
Publication Format:
Issue-based articles in Cochrane Library
DOI References:
Provided for each review
Year:
2014
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
eCommerce error checks for CMP-2014 report
Document Type:
Error Message List
Organization / Institution:
ONRR
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Report preparers, payors
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
IT Configuration, Networking
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
IT professionals, Network administrators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Contextual description:
A technical guide explaining how to modify default values for plink.exe used by iMC on Windows systems by configuring Putty and exporting settings to the iMC server.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Missouri
Topic:
Hereditary Angioedema Treatment
Document Type:
Proposal
Institution:
MO HealthNet
Author:
MO HealthNet and Conduent
Target Audience:
Health professionals and stakeholders in the MO HealthNet program
Effective Period:
Starting from May 9, 2019
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Modification Date:
Not specified
Document Status:
Revision of Existing Criteria
Context:
A proposal outlining the preferred drug list and approval criteria for hereditary angioedema treatment agents within the MO HealthNet program.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
MO HealthNet
Theme:
NSAIDs, Pharmacology, Health Policy
Document Type:
Proposal
Institution:
MO HealthNet, Conduent
Author:
MO HealthNet and Conduent
Target Audience:
Healthcare Providers, Policy Makers, MO HealthNet Participants
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Modification Date:
None
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Missouri, USA
Topic:
Neuropathic Pain Agents
Document Type:
Proposal
Institution:
MO HealthNet
Author:
MO HealthNet and Conduent
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers and MO HealthNet participants
Approval Period:
1 year
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Revision Date:
May 29, 2013
Year:
2026
Region / City:
MO HealthNet
Topic:
Dravet Syndrome, Anticonvulsants
Document Type:
Proposal
Organization:
MO HealthNet
Author:
MO HealthNet and Conduent
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers, MO HealthNet participants
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Missouri
Theme:
Fibromyalgia Treatment
Document Type:
Medical Criteria Proposal
Author:
MO HealthNet and Conduent
Target Audience:
MO HealthNet participants, healthcare providers
Approval Date:
January 20, 2026
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Change Date:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Unknown
Topic:
Payroll Processing, SAP
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization / Institution:
University of Kentucky
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Payroll and finance staff
Effective Date:
07/01/2017
Date of Approval:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown