№ lp_2_1_28568
Supplementary academic resource outlining research and reporting practices considered methodologically incongruent with Big Q Qualitative research and providing explanatory commentary for authors, reviewers and editors engaged in peer review processes.
Document type: Supplementary materials
Associated article: Being really confidently wrong: Qualitative researchers’ experiences of methodological incongruent peer review feedback
Contents: Note 1; Note 2; Note 3; Table 1
Primary focus: Methodological congruence in Big Q Qualitative research
Number of listed practices: Twenty
Intended audience: Authors, reviewers and editors
Key concepts: Big Q Qualitative research; ontology; epistemology; methodology; reflexivity; peer review
Structure: Explanatory notes with references to relevant literature
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.

Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?

You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:
  1. Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
  2. In the app, tap Send.
  3. Select network, paste our wallet address.
  4. Send the exact amount shown above.
After sending, paste your TXID (transaction ID) and your email to receive the download link. Need help? Contact support and we’ll guide you step by step.