№ files_lp_4_process_1_52563
File format: docx
Character count: 2465
File size: 228 KB
Date:
January 8, 2016
Time:
12pm-1pm EST
Webinar Platform:
WebEx
Host:
Partners in MedEd
Contact Information:
[email protected], 724-864-7320
Note:
Attendee Instructions
Meeting Number:
2863 325 9064
Meeting ID:
408-792-6300 / 1-877-668-4490
Call-in Option:
Available
Audio Options:
Computer Audio or Phone
Technical Support Contact:
1-866-229-3239
Webinar Type:
Online Webinar
Purpose:
To provide instructions for joining and participating in a WebEx-based webinar session.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2012
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Accreditation
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
ACGME
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Medical Program Administrators
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Revisions:
N/A
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Context:
Disclosure form related to the ACGME Rural and Underserved GME Advisory Group for reporting financial and non-financial relationships.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chernobyl, Former Soviet Union
Subject:
Military Technology, Environmental Modification, Nuclear Disaster
Document Type:
Documentary, Report
Institution:
Kla.TV
Author:
Werner Altnickel
Target Audience:
General Public, Scholars of History and Military Technology
Period of Action:
1986, 1997, 2002
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
New York
Topic:
International Relations, Israel, United Nations
Document Type:
Opinion Article
Author:
Daniel S. Mariaschin, David J. Michaels
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Tanker Market, Shipping, Freight Rates
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
OPEC
Author:
Nikos Roussanoglou
Target Audience:
Shipping industry professionals, maritime economists
Period of validity:
January 2023
Approval Date:
18/02/2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Author:
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
Email:
[email protected]
Publication platform:
WordPress blog
Source URL:
https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com
Document type:
Opinion essay
Thematic focus:
Masculism, gender politics, financial independence, divorce law
Ideological perspective:
Masculist
Key concepts:
FIP (Financially Independent Person), fluffie, man slavery, manosphere, MGTOW
Geographical references:
United States
Intended audience:
Readers interested in gender issues and men’s rights discourse
Company:
GlowJuice Co. Market expansion: London. Target: Young, tech-savvy.
Student Input (Pre-exam):
Confidence level, study strategies, preferred class activities.
Student Reflection (Post-exam):
Evaluation of exam performance and future improvements.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
London, UK
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Document Type:
Exam Paper
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, educators
Effective Period:
2023-2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendments Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Theme:
Construction, Exterior Materials
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
Silvermine Stone
Author:
Kristi Stolarski
Target Audience:
Builders, Contractors, Homeowners
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Zhongshan, Guangdong
Topic:
Trail Running, Personal Challenge, Business Philosophy
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
TESTEX
Author:
Forrest Chiu
Target Audience:
TESTEX employees, Sports enthusiasts
Event Date:
November 22, 2022
Event Duration:
7 hours, 28 minutes, 5 seconds
Previous Participation:
October 2022, Gobi Desert Challenge
Key Experience:
42km Trekking, 34km Off-road Race, 42.195 km Dongguan International Marathon
Date of Last Update:
November 2022
Interview:
Forrest Chiu (CEO of TESTEX)
Inspirational Quote:
"The pine tree stood proudly on the cliff in the dusk, and clouds flew by calmly, A fairy cave is built in the sky..."
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Injury recovery, running, calf strain
Document type:
Health advice
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Runners, athletes, individuals recovering from calf strain
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context:
A guide to calf strain recovery and safe return to running, including tips for pain relief, fitness maintenance, and injury prevention.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Orca captivity, animal rights, SeaWorld
Document type:
Opinion piece
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Tracie Liquigan
Target audience:
General public, animal rights activists
Period of validity:
Not applicable
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context:
An opinion piece discussing the ethical implications of orca captivity, particularly at SeaWorld, arguing that the psychological and physical harm inflicted on orcas is inhumane and should be stopped.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Programming / Loops
Document Type:
Tutorial / Guide
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Beginners / Programmers
Duration:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Date:
February 6, 2026
Subject:
Major League Baseball spring training history
Sport:
Baseball
Geographic scope:
United States
Document type:
Sports trivia quiz with answer key
Structure:
Nine-inning question format with tiebreaker
Primary topics:
Spring training locations, teams, ballparks, and rare game events
Teams referenced:
New York Mets, St. Louis Cardinals, Chicago Cubs, Detroit Tigers, Boston Red Sox, Cleveland Indians, Los Angeles Dodgers, Houston Astros, Pittsburgh Pirates, Kansas City Royals, New York Yankees, Oakland Athletics
Locations referenced:
Florida, Arizona, California, Alabama, New Jersey, Texas
Title:
See You Again
Featured artist:
Charlie Puth
Primary artist:
Wiz Khalifa
Type:
Song lyrics
Genre:
Hip hop / pop rap
Language:
English
Theme:
Friendship, loss, remembrance
Structure:
Verses and repeated chorus
Voices in text:
Wiz Khalifa, Charlie Puth
Form:
Written lyrics with performer attributions
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Seoul
Theme:
Cultural Diplomacy, Korean Empire History
Document Type:
Announcement, Press Release
Author:
Cultural Heritage Administration
Target Audience:
General Public, Diplomats, Historians
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
HFA Accreditation Process
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
HFO
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Program Sites, Central Admin Staff
Validity Period:
2024
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Medical Corps, Officer Training, Navy
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization:
Bureau of Medicine & Surgery
Author:
Joel Schofer, MD, MBA, CPE, FAAPL, FAAEMCAPT
Target Audience:
Medical Corps Officers, Navy Personnel
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A