№ files_lp_3_process_9_42401
File format: docx
Character count: 7015
File size: 27 KB
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Orca captivity, animal rights, SeaWorld
Document type:
Opinion piece
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Tracie Liquigan
Target audience:
General public, animal rights activists
Period of validity:
Not applicable
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context:
An opinion piece discussing the ethical implications of orca captivity, particularly at SeaWorld, arguing that the psychological and physical harm inflicted on orcas is inhumane and should be stopped.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Education, Science, History, Mathematics, Religious Education, Design & Technology, Physical Education
Document Type:
Educational report
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Children, Teachers, Parents
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Youth sports, education, mentoring
Document type:
Program overview / informational
Organization / Institution:
Never Enough Athletics
Author:
Dirk Lacy, Brett Cornell, Marcus Hopkins
Target audience:
Youth, parents, potential donors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Date:
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Time:
06:00 AM
Program:
Jake And The Never Land Pirates: Pirate Pogo / The Sneaky Snook-Off
Language:
English
Audience:
General Audience
Broadcast Channel:
Seven Network
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2025
Date:
August 9, 2025
Location:
San Diego
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
AskTuring
Industry:
Artificial Intelligence
Subject:
Enterprise AI Platform and Data Privacy
Key Feature:
“Never Train” Guarantee
Funding:
$2 million oversubscribed round
Planned Availability:
Early access August 2025; broader availability Q4 2025
Media Contact:
Barbara Bry
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Contact Phone:
858-248-9465
Title of Excerpt:
“The Noble Experiment”
Source Text:
I Never Had It Made
Author:
Jackie Robinson
Subject:
Integration of Major League Baseball
Historical Context:
Racial segregation in American baseball
Key Figure Mentioned:
Branch Rickey
Educational Level:
Grade 7
Suggested Time:
5 days (45 minutes per day)
Standards Referenced:
Common Core ELA Standards RI.7.1, RI.7.2, RI.7.3, RI.7.4; W.7.1, W.7.4, W.7.9; SL.7.1; L.7.1, L.7.2, L.7.4
Document Type:
Instructional curriculum guide with text-dependent questions
Intended Audience:
Teachers and Grade 7 students
Primary Theme:
Nonviolence, personal courage, and social change
Focus Topic:
Branch Rickey’s plan to integrate Major League Baseball and Jackie Robinson’s response
Year:
2014
Author:
Emergent Economics
Publication date:
February 24, 2014
Topic:
Global poverty and economic inequality
Region:
Global
Document type:
Article / Analysis
Intended audience:
General readers interested in economics and development
Key concepts:
Poverty, income disparity, literacy, health, economic statistics, global development
Source references:
Bill Gates’s annual letter, Overseas Development Institute, World Bank data, Morten Jerven’s Poor Numbers
Contextual focus:
Economic conditions and misconceptions in low-income countries
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Victoria
Theme:
Health / Vaccination
Document Type:
Informational
Organization:
Victorian Government, Department of Health and Human Services
Author:
Public Health Communications
Target Audience:
General Public, Vulnerable Groups
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
June 2019
Date of Changes:
N/A
Content Type:
Informational brochure about flu vaccination
Language:
English
Language:
English
Genre:
Popular music lyrics
Type of document:
Song lyrics collection
Form:
Poetic text
Structure:
Separate song texts with repeated choruses and verses
Themes:
Love, music, relationships, longing, joy
Intended audience:
General audience
Compilation:
Multiple independent songs
Literary features:
Repetition, rhyme, colloquial expressions
Year:
2015
Date:
May 1, 2015
Location:
United States
Theme:
Postsecondary education, college completion, youth policy, inequality
Document Type:
Forum summary and panel proceedings
Organizing Institution:
American Youth Policy Forum
Commissioning Institution:
William T. Grant Foundation
Related Publication:
The New Forgotten Half and Research Directions to Support Them
Authors Mentioned:
Adam Gamoran; James Rosenbaum; Barbara Veazey
Population Focus:
Community college students and young adults who do not obtain a credential
Time Period Analyzed:
2002–2012
Subject Areas:
Community colleges, sub-baccalaureate credentials, education policy, workforce development
Geographic Scope:
National (United States)
Court:
Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Clermont County, Ohio
Jurisdiction:
Clermont County, Ohio
Type of Document:
Court pleading
Parties:
Plaintiff (Parent) and Defendant (Other Parent)
Subject Matter:
Child support, cash medical support, health insurance, custody, parenting time
Family Status:
Parents never married to each other
Children Concerned:
Minor biological or adoptive children
Related Case Reference:
Prior custody order (Case Number unspecified)
Relief Requested:
Order for child support, cash medical support, provision of health insurance, and parenting time determination
Signature Requirement:
Plaintiff’s signature, email address, and phone number
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Madison
Theme:
Women’s Suffrage, Women’s Rights
Document Type:
Research Paper Proposal
Institution:
Soci 288
Author:
Madison Iceton
Target Audience:
Academic community
Period of Activity:
1840s - present
Approval Date:
July 22nd, 2020
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Unknown
Theme:
Moral philosophy, anger, responsibility
Document type:
Academic article
Author:
Robert H. Wallace
Target Audience:
Scholars and fans of philosophy and Avatar: The Last Airbender
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
The text analyzes the moral implications of anger and responsibility in the TV show "Avatar:
The Last Airbender," exploring the ethical dilemmas surrounding forgiveness, blame, and compassion in response to wrongdoing.
Year:
2020
Region / city:
USA, South Korea, Hong Kong
Topic:
E-cigarette use, Respiratory disease, Asthma, COPD
Document type:
Research article
Author:
Alnajem A, Redha A, Alroumi D, Cho JH, Paik SM, McConnell R, Barrington-Trimis JL, Osei AD, Mirboulouk M, Wang MP, Wills TA, Xie W, Antwi GO, Rhodes DL, Barrameda R, Nguyen T, Wong V, Perez MF, Atuegwu N, Oncken C, Mead EL, Mortensen EM
Target audience:
Researchers, Medical professionals
Period:
2016-2018
Date of approval:
2020
Date of changes:
2022
Contextual description:
Research article examining the relationship between e-cigarette use and respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD among adolescents and adults.
Original title:
Non disse mai no, Edizioni Paoline – Roma, 1967
Translator:
Fr. Cesare Bettoni RCJ
Editor:
Cherry C. Aquino
General Editor:
Fr. Jose Maria Ezpeleta RCJ
Authorized to print:
Fr. Bruno Rampazzo RCJ
Publisher:
General Commission on Translations
Edition:
2nd Edition
Publication year:
2019
Place of publication:
Rome, Italy
Subject:
Biography, Catholic Saints, Religious Life
Document type:
Book
Target audience:
Seminarians, religious scholars, general public interested in hagiography
Dedication:
Fr. Gaspare Gallitto, RCJ
Chronology included:
Canonization process of St. Hannibal Mary Di Francia
Language of original:
Italian
Copyright:
© 1967 by the General Curia of the Rogationists
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chernobyl, Former Soviet Union
Subject:
Military Technology, Environmental Modification, Nuclear Disaster
Document Type:
Documentary, Report
Institution:
Kla.TV
Author:
Werner Altnickel
Target Audience:
General Public, Scholars of History and Military Technology
Period of Action:
1986, 1997, 2002
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
New York
Topic:
International Relations, Israel, United Nations
Document Type:
Opinion Article
Author:
Daniel S. Mariaschin, David J. Michaels
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Tanker Market, Shipping, Freight Rates
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
OPEC
Author:
Nikos Roussanoglou
Target Audience:
Shipping industry professionals, maritime economists
Period of validity:
January 2023
Approval Date:
18/02/2023
Date of Changes:
N/A