№ lp_2_3_03610
File format: docx
Character count: 4768
File size: 17 KB
Year:
2022
Region / City:
New York
Topic:
International Relations, Israel, United Nations
Document Type:
Opinion Article
Author:
Daniel S. Mariaschin, David J. Michaels
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Change Date:
March 24, 2015
Document Section:
Section G
Topic:
Requests for Reconsideration
Type of Document:
Administrative manual guidance
Issuing Authority:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Program Area:
Veterans benefits claims adjudication
Subject Matter:
Reconsideration of non-final VA decisions
Applicable Appeal Period:
One-year appeal period
Referenced Forms:
VA Form 21-0958; VA Form 21-4142; VA Form 21-4142a; VA Form 21-526EZ
Referenced Manual:
M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual
Target Audience:
VA claims processors and adjudication staff
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Los Gatos, CA
Topic:
PAN ID Compression
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
IEEE
Author:
Benjamin Rolfe
Target Audience:
IEEE P802.15 working group
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
15 Sept 2015
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Los Gatos, CA
Topic:
PAN ID Compression in IEEE 802.15.4 standard
Document type:
Technical submission
Organization / institution:
IEEE P802.15
Author:
Benjamin Rolfe
Target audience:
IEEE 802.15 Working Group members
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval date:
14 July 2015
Date of changes:
Not specified
Organization:
IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks
Project:
IEEE P802.15
Document type:
Technical contribution
Standard:
IEEE 802.15.4 / 802.15.4e
Submission date:
14 July 2015
Author:
Benjamin Rolfe
Affiliation:
BCA
Committee:
Maintenance Standing Committee
Related work:
802.15.4 Revision Preparation
Subject:
PAN ID Compression rules and frame addressing
Release status:
IEEE contribution, publicly available
Source type:
Standards working group submission
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Parenting, Car Safety, Family Travel
Document Type:
Article
Organization / Institution:
Vitality
Author:
Vitality Experts
Target Audience:
Parents, Caregivers
Action Period:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
TLS Server Certificates
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
CA/Browser Forum
Author:
CA/Browser Forum
Target Audience:
Certification Authorities, Browser Vendors, Other Internet Stakeholders
Effective Period:
Not yet in effect
Approval Date:
12 January 2026
Change Date:
N/A
Contextual Description:
A policy document outlining the requirements for the issuance and management of publicly-trusted TLS server certificates, including lifecycle management, security controls, and procedural guidelines.
Year:
2024
Volume:
48
DOI:
10.33321/cdi.2024.48.29
Electronic publication date:
17/07/2024
Authors:
Leesa D Bruggink; Bruce Thorley
Region:
Victoria, Australia
Subject:
Norovirus incidence and genotypes in 2022
Keywords:
norovirus; viral gastroenteritis; childcare; outbreak; genotypes; COVID-19 restrictions
Type of document:
Scientific journal article
Institutions mentioned:
Victorian Department of Health; Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL)
Study period:
January–December 2022
Data source:
Gastroenteritis outbreak notifications and laboratory testing in Victoria
Laboratory methods:
RT-qPCR (RIDAGENE Norovirus I & II, R-Biopharm, PG1415); genotyping of polymerase and capsid regions
Ethics statement:
Deidentified specimens; exempt from human ethics approval
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Negative Pressure Pulmonary Oedema, General Anaesthesia, Laryngospasm
Document Type:
Case Report
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, Anaesthesiologists, Pulmonologists
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Organization:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
Application:
My Pension Benefit Access (MyPBA)
Document Type:
Focus Group Scenario and Usability Study Script
Purpose:
Evaluation of accuracy and ease of use of the MyPBA application
Regulatory Approval:
Office of Management and Budget (OMB Control No. 1212-0066)
OMB Expiration Date:
10/31/2023
Legal Framework:
Paperwork Reduction Act; Privacy Act; Freedom of Information Act
Session Duration:
Approximately 90 minutes
Target Audience:
Individuals not yet receiving pension benefits
Activities Included:
Account creation, beneficiary review, pension plan review, estimate request submission, feedback collection
Confidentiality Statement:
Responses used solely for PBGC customer service improvement
Website Referenced:
pbgc.gov
Year:
1843
Region / City:
London
Theme:
Christmas, Ghost Story, Transformation
Document Type:
Excerpt
Author:
Charles Dickens
Target Audience:
General public, readers of Victorian literature
Period of Action:
Nineteenth century
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Context
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Manchester, UK
Theme:
Aspergillosis, Immunology, Serology
Document Type:
Review Article
Organization / Institution:
Mycology Reference Centre Manchester, University Hospital of South Manchester, National Aspergillosis Center, The University of Manchester
Author:
Malcolm D. Richardson, Iain D. Page
Target Audience:
Researchers, Medical Professionals
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Title:
Yet a Little While
Publication:
The Signs of the Times
Volume:
13
Issue:
5
Pages:
71–72
Date of Publication:
February 3, 1887
Genre:
Religious periodical article
Subject:
Biblical prophecy and the second coming of Christ
Biblical References:
Isaiah 59; Hosea 4; Joel 1–2; Revelation 16; Micah 7; Habakkuk 1–2; Hebrews 10; 2 Thessalonians 1
Theological Focus:
Judgment, moral decline, Day of the Lord, Second Advent
Intended Audience:
Christian readers
Historical Context:
Late 19th-century Protestant eschatological interpretation
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Lagos
Theme:
Marriage, Family, Cultural Conflict
Document Type:
Narrative
Author:
Chinua Achebe
Note:
Prologue
Why, Vasher thought, do so many things begin with me getting thrown into prison? The guardsmen laughed to one another outside, slamming the cell door shut with a clang. Vasher stood and duste:
land of Returned Gods, Lifeless servants, BioChromatic research, and--of course--color. The large guard sauntered toward the cell, leaving his friends to their fun with Vasher’s pack. “They say you’re pretty tough,” the man said, sizing up Vasher. Vasher did not respond. “The bartender says you beat down some twenty men in the brawl.” The guard rubbed his chin. “You don’t look that tough to me.” Vasher shrugged. The guard snorted. “You should have known better than to strike a priest. The others, they’ll spend a night locked up. You, though--you’ll hang. Colorless fool.” Vasher turned away, looking over his cell. It was functional, if unoriginal. A thin slit in the top let in light, the stone walls dripped with water and lichen, and a pile of dirty straw decomposed in the corner. “You ignoring me?” the guard asked, stepping closer to the bars. As he did so, the colors of his uniform brightened faintly, like he’d stepped into a stronger light. The change was slight. Vasher didn’t have much Breath remaining. The guard didn’t notice the change in color--just like he hadn’t noticed back in the bar, when he and his buddies had picked Vasher up off the floor and thrown him in their cart. He’d soon wish that he’d been more observant. “Here, now,” one of the men said from behind. “What’s this?” Those two were still looking through Vasher’s pack. Vasher had always found it odd that the men who patrolled dungeons tended to be as bad, or worse, than the men they guarded. Perhaps that was intentional. Society didn’t seem to care if such men were outside the cells or in them--just as long as they were kept away from more honest men. Assuming that such a thing existed. A guard pulled a long object--wrapped in white linen--free from Vasher’s bag. The man frowned at the object, then unwrapped it, revealing a large, thin-bladed sword in a silver sheath. The hilt was pure black. The guard whistled quietly. “Who do you suppose he stole this from?” The lead guard eyed Vasher again, frowning. He was likely wondering if Vasher might be some kind of nobleman. Though such things didn’t really exist in Hallandren, many neighboring kingdoms had their lords and ladies. Yet, what lord would wear a drab brown cloak, ripped in several places? What lord would sport bruises from a bar fight, a half-grown beard, and boots worn from years of walking? Eventually, the guard turned away, apparently convinced that Vasher was no lord. He was right. And he was wrong. “Let me see that,” t
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chernobyl, Former Soviet Union
Subject:
Military Technology, Environmental Modification, Nuclear Disaster
Document Type:
Documentary, Report
Institution:
Kla.TV
Author:
Werner Altnickel
Target Audience:
General Public, Scholars of History and Military Technology
Period of Action:
1986, 1997, 2002
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Tanker Market, Shipping, Freight Rates
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
OPEC
Author:
Nikos Roussanoglou
Target Audience:
Shipping industry professionals, maritime economists
Period of validity:
January 2023
Approval Date:
18/02/2023
Date of Changes:
N/A
Author:
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
Email:
[email protected]
Publication platform:
WordPress blog
Source URL:
https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com
Document type:
Opinion essay
Thematic focus:
Masculism, gender politics, financial independence, divorce law
Ideological perspective:
Masculist
Key concepts:
FIP (Financially Independent Person), fluffie, man slavery, manosphere, MGTOW
Geographical references:
United States
Intended audience:
Readers interested in gender issues and men’s rights discourse