№ files_lp_4_process_2_68603
File format: docx
Character count: 766
File size: 366 KB
Step-by-step guide for creating and completing an athlete profile on the ATS platform, detailing login credentials and required information across multiple tabs.
Year:
2026
Organization:
Juniata College
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Target Audience:
Athletes registering for ATS
Platform:
juniata2.atsusers.com
Content Focus:
Account creation and data entry for athlete profiles
Steps Included:
Login, Personal Information, Immunization, Insurance, Contact Information
Security Note:
Remember Athlete ID and Password for future logins
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Effective
Programme:
Advanced Teacher Status (ATS)
Cohort:
October 2025
Application period:
2 June 2025 – 30 September 2025
Issuing organisations:
The Society for Education and Training (SET); Education and Training Foundation (ETF)
Submission method:
Email to [email protected]
Required attachments:
CV; teaching timetable; qualification certificates; employer agreement (if applicable)
Eligibility criteria:
Minimum 320 hours post-14 group teaching; Level 5 or above teaching qualification; subject specialism qualification at Level 3 or above; Level 2 English and maths; QTS or QTLS (if applicable)
Review process:
Panel review by the Education and Training Foundation (ETF)
Feedback timeframe:
Within eight weeks of receipt
Notification deadline:
10 October 2025
Portfolio issue date:
13 October 2025
Confidentiality:
Information stored securely for the duration of the programme in accordance with the Privacy Notice
Target applicants:
Post-14 teachers and trainers seeking Advanced Teacher Status
Year:
2010
Region / City:
Australia
Theme:
Automotive Transformation Scheme
Document Type:
Registration Form
Organization:
AusIndustry
Author:
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science
Target Audience:
Businesses applying for ATS registration
Effective Period:
No specific period mentioned
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2013
Region / City:
New Delhi
Subject:
Transmission Service Provider Selection
Document Type:
Request for Qualification
Organization:
PFC Consulting Limited
Author:
PFC Consulting Limited
Target Audience:
Prospective Bidders
Validity Period:
2013-2014
Approval Date:
September 11, 2013
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia / New Zealand
Topic:
Geotechnical Engineering
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
Austroads
Author:
Austroads
Target Audience:
Engineers, Contractors, Technical Specialists
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Date of Issue:
{date of issue}
Recipient:
Executive Director (CAP), Airports Authority of India
Location:
Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi
Employee Name:
{Name of the air traffic controller’s licence holder}
Designation:
{designation}
Employee ID:
{employee Id}
Current Station:
{name of present station of posting}
ATC Licence Number:
{ATCOL number}
Rating:
{name of rating}
Rating Endorsement Date:
{date of issue of endorsement of rating by DGCA}
Work Experience:
{working experience in months/year}
Previous ATS Unit:
{name of relevant similar ATS unit}
Previous ATS Station:
{Name of ATS station}
Rating Validity:
valid / not invalid for over three and a half years
New ATS Station Category:
{category of ATS station as per the concerned unit based on the average daily movement of aircraft}
Average Daily Movement at Previous Unit:
{average daily movement of aircraft}
Average Daily Movement at New Unit:
{station of newly established ATS unit}
Signatory:
{Name & Designation}
Stamp:
Present
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Accredited tutor status application
Document type:
Application form
Institution:
British Dyslexia Association (BDA)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Candidates applying for accredited tutor status
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Journal:
Advances in Transportation Studies
Type of document:
Author guidelines and manuscript template
Academic field:
Transportation engineering
Topics:
Road and highway engineering, transport safety, traffic operations, transportation systems and policy
Publication frequency:
Four-monthly journal
Peer review process:
Single blind peer review
Editor-in-Chief:
Prof. Alessandro Calvi
Affiliated institution:
Roma Tre University
Institution address:
Department of Engineering, Via Vito Volterra 60, 00146 Rome, Italy
Contact email:
[email protected]
Language of manuscripts:
English
Submission format:
Microsoft Word electronic manuscript
Maximum manuscript length:
7,500 words or 16 pages including figures and tables
Required elements:
Abstract, keywords, figures and tables embedded in text, references
Copyright requirement:
Copyright Transfer Agreement required before publication
Target audience:
Transportation scholars, researchers, engineers, planners and policy analysts
Journal scope:
Advanced research on road infrastructure, vehicle technologies, driver behavior, traffic safety, environmental impacts, and transportation policy
Review timeframe:
First review decision typically within 4–6 weeks
Average publication time:
Approximately 8 months after submission
Publication fees:
No publication fees for ordinary issues
Start of publication mentioned:
Since 2003
Year:
2026
Organization:
British Dyslexia Association
Document Type:
Renewal Form / Application
Target Audience:
Accredited specialist teachers in dyslexia and SpLD
Required CPD Hours:
Minimum 15 hours over the last three years
Required Teaching Hours:
Minimum 10 hours per year
Submission Method:
Email with certificates
Payment Fee:
£85
Privacy Compliance:
GDPR 2018
Accreditation Types:
ATS, ATS FE-HE, ATD, APS, APD
Content Sections:
Continuing Professional Development, Reflection, Professional Activities
Additional Guidelines:
Appendix 1 (Formal and Informal CPD examples), Appendix 2 (Professional activities examples)
Language:
English
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Business Software / Presentation Software
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Glenda Liddell-White
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
April 14 – 18, 2025
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for teaching students how to create and manage professional presentations using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Engineering Awards
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Author:
Jane Moran Alspach
Target Audience:
Members of the American Society of Civil Engineers, potential nominators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
-
Theme:
Production Resources/Tools Master Data Creation
Document Type:
Master Data Script
Organization / Institution:
SAP
Author:
-
Target Audience:
SAP system users, Production Engineers, Data Specialists, Maintenance Planners
Validity Period:
-
Approval Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Michigan
Topic:
Bleach Dilution for Disinfection
Document Type:
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
Institution:
Michigan State University, Center for Research on Ingredient Safety
Author:
Anderson, E., and J. Li
Target Audience:
Laboratory Personnel
Effective Date:
5-14-2020
Revision Date:
5-14-2020
Note:
Year
Topic:
Onboarding, Personal Development, Workplace Integration
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
New employees, managers, HR professionals
Year:
2016
Region / City:
San Francisco, CA
Subject:
Construction, demolition, renovation, and installation at VA San Francisco Health Care System
Document Type:
Bid Request
Organ / Institution:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Network Contracting Office 21
Author:
Karen Smith, Contracting Officer
Target Audience:
Contractors holding MATOC contracts with VISN 21
Period of Action:
September 9, 2016
Approval Date:
September 7, 2016