№ lp_1_21965
File format: docx
Character count: 23702
File size: 1430 KB
This document provides a detailed guide for creating a nomination package for the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Society Awards, outlining the nomination process for various categories such as papers, individuals, projects, and educational programs.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Engineering Awards
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Author:
Jane Moran Alspach
Target Audience:
Members of the American Society of Civil Engineers, potential nominators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Hollywood, CA
Theme:
Music Awards
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
Hollywood Music in Media Awards (HMMA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Music industry professionals, film and media enthusiasts
Effective Period:
2025
Approval Date:
November 5, 2025
Changes Date:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Lincoln, UK
Topic:
Honorary awards nomination process
Document Type:
Procedure
Institution:
Bishop Grosseteste University
Author:
Governance, Compliance and Operations Manager
Target Audience:
Current staff and students, retired staff, alumni, University Council members
Effective Period:
From July 2018
Date Approved:
July 2018
Review Date:
June 2021
Document Location:
Website and Staff Portal
Document Distribution:
Printed version given to enrolling students, document available on Admissions pages of website
Year:
2025
Region / city:
New Delhi, India
Theme:
Intangible Cultural Heritage, Safeguarding
Document Type:
Report
Institution:
Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, UNESCO
Author:
Evaluation Body
Target audience:
Member States, Cultural Heritage Experts, Government Officials
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval date:
2025
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Event:
Nineteenth session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage
Location:
Asunción, Paraguay
Type of document:
Committee report and draft decisions
Convention:
2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage
Submitted nominations:
Wosana ritual (Botswana), Reog Ponorogo performing art (Indonesia)
Evaluation Body:
Recommendations on nominations
Inscription list:
List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding
Decision draft numbers:
19.COM 7.a.1, 19.COM 7.a.2
Year:
2021
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Nominations, Committee Elections, Board of Directors
Document Type:
Committee Report
Organization / Institution:
MARILN
Author:
Nancy Craig-Williams PhD MS RN
Target Audience:
MARILN members
Period of Action:
September 2021
Approval Date:
September 2021
Year:
2022
Organization:
Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association (WWOA)
Document type:
Nomination form
Positions:
Vice President, Board Directors (2-year terms)
Submission method:
Mail or email
Contact person:
Don Lintner, Past President and Nominations Chair
Website:
https://www.wwoa.org/organization/directors-and-chairs/
Region:
Wisconsin, USA
Audience:
WWOA members
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Nairobi, Kenya
Theme:
Methyl Bromide Use and Regulation
Document Type:
Report
Institution:
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Author:
Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP)
Target Audience:
Parties to the Montreal Protocol, environmental professionals, and policy-makers
Period of Validity:
2016-2017
Approval Date:
September 2015
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Mississippi
Topic:
Nursing Education, Professional Development
Document Type:
Candidate Profile
Organization / Institution:
Mississippi Organization of Associate Degree Nursing (MOADN)
Author:
Amy C. Esslinger, MSN, MHA, RN, CNE
Target Audience:
MOADN members, nursing professionals, stakeholders
Action Period:
2025 election
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Sunshine Coast
Topic:
Board Elections
Document Type:
Official Call for Nominations
Organization:
Visit Sunshine Coast Limited
Author:
Visit Sunshine Coast
Target Audience:
Eligible financial members of Visit Sunshine Coast
Period of Validity:
Nominations open until 22nd October 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Date:
December 13, 2023
Subject:
Riverside County Transportation Commission Nomination Process for the 2024 Southern California Association of Governments Call for Project Nominations
Organ / Agency:
Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Related Organization:
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
Region:
Riverside County, California
Funding Programs:
Surface Transportation Block Grant; Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement; Carbon Reduction Program
Total Available Funding:
Approximately $275 million
Eligible Applicants:
Riverside County cities, County, transit operators, and Tribal governments
Application Deadline:
Close of business Friday, January 12, 2024
Meeting Dates:
January 3, 2024; January 9, 2024
Document Type:
Official intake form and nomination procedures document
Required Attachments:
Map of proposed project improvements; Project funding spreadsheet; Environmental documentation or right-of-way clearance (if applicable)
Certification Requirement:
Signature, title, and date required
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Eastern Cape
Topic:
Nomination for Audit Committee
Document Type:
Public Announcement
Organization / Institution:
Eastern Cape Liquor Board
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Public, government employees
Period of Validity:
Until position is filled
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Zimbabwe
Topic:
Human Rights Commission, Public Nominations
Document Type:
Official Government Announcement
Institution:
Parliament of Zimbabwe
Author:
Committee on Standing Rules and Orders (CSRO)
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Action:
Until 17th March 2023
Approval Date:
3rd March 2023
Date of Changes:
None
Context:
Official notice from the Zimbabwe Parliament calling for public nominations to fill three vacancies on the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission due to the expiry of terms of three commissioners.
Year:
2025
Region / city:
San Francisco, CA
Topic:
EAPA Awards, Employee Assistance Programs
Document Type:
Call for Nominations
Organization:
EAPA (Employee Assistance Professional Association)
Target audience:
EAPA members, Employee Assistance Professionals
Period of validity:
May 1, 2025
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2025-2026
Region:
Wisconsin, US
Program Type:
Leadership and management development program
Coordinating Organization:
DOA Bureau of Training and Development
Eligibility:
New and aspiring managers from all state agencies
Nomination Method:
Manager/Supervisor nomination or self-nomination with approval
Program Duration:
One year
Participation Requirements:
Attendance at all sessions, completion of collaborative project
Target Audience:
State service employees with less than two years of supervisory experience or aspiring managers
Application Components:
Nominee information, supervisory experience, recommendation letter, nominee essay, commitment agreement
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Capital Region, Albany, NY
Theme:
Commercial real estate awards
Document Type:
Call for nominations
Organization:
Capital Region Building Owners and Managers Association (CRBOMA)
Target Audience:
Commercial real estate professionals, property managers, building owners
Effective Date:
December 7, 2017
Submission Deadline:
August 18, 2017
Contact Information:
[email protected]
Note:
, (518) 694-5016
Categories:
TOBY Awards, CRBOMA Awards, Property Manager of the Year, Engineer of the Year, etc.
Event Location:
The Renaissance, Albany, NY
Date of Last Update:
July 14, 2017
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Business Software / Presentation Software
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Glenda Liddell-White
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
April 14 – 18, 2025
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for teaching students how to create and manage professional presentations using Microsoft PowerPoint.