№ files_lp_4_process_3_126185
File format: docx
Character count: 901
File size: 15 KB
Year:
2021
Region / City:
VMC
Topic:
Trivia Night
Document Type:
Event Invitation
Organization / Institution:
VMC PPO
Author:
VMC PPO
Target Audience:
VMC families
Event Date:
February 5th, 2021
Deadline for Registration:
February 2nd, 2021, 9:00 PM
Context Description:
Invitation for VMC families to participate in a virtual trivia event hosted by VMC PPO.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Organizing Entity:
WHNN
Owner and Operator:
Cumulus Radio LLC
Parent Company:
Cumulus Media New Holdings, Inc.
Address:
1740 Champagne Dr, Saginaw, MI 48604
Designated Market Area:
WHNN DMA as defined by Nielsen Audio
Contest Period:
September 2, 2025 – September 5, 2025
Start Time:
7:01am ET, September 2, 2025
End Time:
8:59am ET, September 5, 2025
Eligibility:
Legal U.S. residents (excluding Florida and New York), age 18 or older, with valid Social Security number
Prize:
Four (4) prizes of four tickets each to Disney On Ice at The Dow Event Center
Prize Dates:
September 11, 2025 or September 12, 2025
Approximate Retail Value:
$75.00
Entry Method:
On-air telephone entry during designated broadcast times
Winner Selection:
10th caller with correct trivia answer as determined by Station
Governing Law:
Subject to applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations
Type:
Informational compilation
Subject:
State history, symbols, geography, economy, and notable figures
Geographic Coverage:
Alabama and Alaska, United States
States Covered:
Alabama; Alaska
Time Span Covered:
18th–20th centuries
Key Topics:
Statehood; official symbols; historical events; natural resources; notable residents; government institutions; economic development
Notable Locations Mentioned:
Montgomery; Huntsville; Mobile; Birmingham; Enterprise; Russell Cave; Cheaha Mountain; Redstone Arsenal; Fort McClellan; Bessemer; Old Saint Stephens; Prudhoe Bay; Valdez; Kodiak Island; Aleutian Islands; Nome; Fairbanks; Yukon
Government Institutions Mentioned:
Alabama Legislature; Alabama Department of Archives; Army Ballistic Missile Agency; Alaska Legislature; Alaska State Legislature
Document Focus:
Historical milestones and state symbols
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Mental Health Awareness
Document Type:
Educational Quiz
Organization / Institution:
National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI)
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
General public, individuals seeking mental health awareness
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Risk assessment
Document type:
Risk assessment report
Organization / Institution:
Canadian Law Society
Author:
Emmali Vriend (Secretary)
Target Audience:
Event attendees, society members
Period of validity:
January 30, 2026
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Industry:
Manufacturing
Document Type:
Quiz
Audience:
Employees of ESOP companies
Purpose:
To educate employees about ESOPs
State:
Illinois
Number of questions:
17
Federal Guidelines:
ERISA
Employee Contribution Required:
False
Responsibility for Share Price:
ESOP plan administrators
Date:
February 23, 2005
Author:
XJWriter
Number of Comments:
13
Original Titles:
A Place of Her Own, Enter the Can, Play Misty With Me, Action Jenny, Comet Goddess
Revised Titles:
A Pain in My Sidekick, Toying with Jenny, Crash Pad Crash, Teen Idol, Teenage Mutant Ninja Troubles
Spoiler Alert:
Yes
Answers Correct:
Tyde45 - All correct, Zoe - 3 correct, Kevin - 2 correct
Region:
Unknown
Type of Content:
Trivia Game
Platform:
Blog
Context:
A list of unaired episodes with original titles and their revised titles, where readers attempt to match them.
Year:
2020
Platform:
Online forum
Topic:
Television animation, Teenage Robot series
Document type:
Comment archive
Participants:
Andrew N.P., XJWriter, Kevin, Z-Lady, tyde45, The Great One, Jack Naka, Anonymous
Number of comments:
13
Time frame:
December 28, 2020, 10:31–15:54
Subject matter:
Episode title guessing game, viewer interactions, season two and three speculation
Context:
Online forum comment archive capturing fan discussions, guesses, and reactions to episode titles of the Teenage Robot animated series
Year:
2026
Event:
Fourth of July
Type of document:
Puzzle / Word Search
Topics:
U.S. history, Independence Day, Founding Fathers
Key terms included:
Continental Congress, British, Vermont, Philadelphia, Adams, Jefferson, Massachusetts, Coolidge
Format:
Printable game
Audience:
General public, students
Related locations:
United States
Year:
2005
Region / City:
Ireland
Topic:
General Knowledge, Pop Culture, History
Document Type:
Quiz
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
General public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Germs, Hygiene, Education
Document Type:
Educational Material
Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Children, Students, Educators
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Topics:
Movies, Television, Sports, Music, Video Games, Pop Culture
Type:
Quiz / Trivia Compilation
Source:
Unspecified collection of questions
Intended Audience:
General knowledge enthusiasts
Format:
Multiple-choice style prompts without answers provided
Year:
2014
Period:
20.01.2014 – 14.02.2014
Region / Location:
India, Tamil Nadu, Kashmir, Jaffna, South Africa, Canada
Subject:
History, Literature, Science, Language, Culture
Document type:
Quiz Nuggets / Educational Excerpts
Sources:
"The Horse, The Wheel & Language", Bhagavad Gita, Sangam Literature, Koyil Olugu, Nachinarkkiniyar, Dr. Sarojini Naidu, PBS, NY Times
Authors / Contributors:
Various (compiled by curator)
Languages featured:
English, Tamil, Italian, Sanskrit excerpts
Target audience:
General readers interested in cultural and historical knowledge
Content format:
Question-answer style with explanations and historical context
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
Interpreter Services, Sign Language, Government Agencies
Document Type:
Manual, Agreement
Organization:
Virginia Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Target Audience:
Qualified Sign Language Interpreters, State and Local Government Agencies
Effective Date:
January 1, 2020
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2020
Date of Last Update:
January 1, 2020
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Burlington
Subject:
Signage Regulations
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Institution:
Burlington City Government
Target Audience:
Property owners, contractors, and individuals applying for sign permits
Program name:
Ashland Sign & Façade Program
Document type:
Application form
Grant type:
Reimbursement grant
Administering organization:
Town of Ashland
Administering program:
Ashland Economic Development Incentive Program
Location:
Ashland, Massachusetts
Eligible applicants:
Businesses located in Ashland
Eligible improvements:
Exterior façade and sign improvements
Maximum funding amount:
Up to 50% of project cost or $5,000
Funding source:
Town funding
Approval authority:
Ashland Economic Development Advisory Group; Town Manager; Board of Selectmen
Submission requirements:
Completed application, bids, permits, supporting documents
Contact person:
Economic Development Director
Contact address:
101 Main Street, Ashland, MA 01721
Contact email:
[email protected]
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Indiana
Subject:
World Languages
Document Type:
Academic Standards
Institution:
Indiana Department of Education
Author:
Indiana Department of Education
Target Audience:
Teachers, School Administrators, Curriculum Planners
Period of Application:
Kindergarten to Grade 12
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
2019
Year:
2016
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Traffic Sign Illumination Research
Document Type:
Invitation to Tender
Organization:
Transport for London (TfL)
Author:
Transport for London (TfL)
Target Audience:
Research firms, Tenderers
Period of Activity:
February 2016
Approval Date:
February 2016
Modification Date:
N/A