№ lp_2_3_07210
File format: docx
Character count: 2907
File size: 16 KB
Case study of a sales strategy implementation at Pony Express Bank (PEB), focusing on cross-selling to current customers and the challenges it created.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
United States, Houston
Subject:
Sales strategy, Customer service, Cross-selling
Document type:
Case study
Organization / Institution:
Pony Express Bank
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Business professionals, management
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Tax law, Corporate taxation
Document Type:
Legal Analysis
Agency / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Tax professionals, Corporate entities
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Case No.:
D13/21
Jurisdiction:
Hong Kong
Subject Matter:
Profits tax – source of profits – offshore profits claim
Type of Document:
Board of Review decision
Relevant Legislation:
Inland Revenue Ordinance (sections 2, 14(1), 66, 68(4), (8), (9), Part 1 of Schedule 5)
Panel:
Chui Pak Ming Norman (chairman), Chung Koon Ying, Louis, Ng Cheuk Ping, Charmaine
Date of Hearing:
24 June 2021; 2 September 2021
Date of Decision:
17 December 2021
Appellant:
Private company incorporated in Hong Kong
Respondent:
Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Tax Year in Dispute:
2016/17 (with provisional tax for 2017/18)
Assessable Profits (Original):
HK$360,000
Tax Payable (Original):
HK$39,400
Assessable Profits (Revised):
HK$145,241
Tax Payable (Revised):
HK$5,991
Amount of Costs Ordered:
HK$25,000
Outcome:
Appeal dismissed; Revised Profits Tax Assessment confirmed
Key Issue:
Whether the Subject Profits were sourced offshore or arose in or were derived from Hong Kong
Related Activities:
Acquisition and sale of blinds and accessories; installation works; manufacturing by third party in the Mainland
Year:
2009
Region / City:
Florida
Subject:
Lost Profits, Legal Claims
Document Type:
Legal Precedent
Organization / Institution:
Florida Courts
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
1993
Jurisdiction:
Tasmania, Australia
Subject:
Unexplained wealth, confiscation of criminal profits
Document type:
Legislative review report
Agency:
Department of Justice, Tasmania
Author:
Mr Damian Bugg AM QC
Target audience:
Parliament, legal professionals, public stakeholders
Period of implementation:
Part 9 commenced 1 March 2014
Review date:
2017
Bill implementation date:
2018
Public consultation deadline:
27 July 2018
Key provisions:
Restraining and forfeiting property, investigations, examinations, production of documents, wealth restraining orders, Public Trustee fees
Reference:
20855
Telephone:
6271 6270
e-mail:
[email protected]
Note:
Mr Robert Raether
Date:
25 January 2017
Document Type:
Regulation Impact Statement
Subject:
Diverted Profits Tax
Author:
Chris Toyne
Target Audience:
Decision Makers in Government
Period of Action:
Until final decision
Approval Date:
25 January 2017
Amendment Date:
N/A
Description:
A formal communication providing feedback on a Regulation Impact Statement related to a diverted profits tax.
Year:
2019
Date:
16 September 2019
Country:
Myanmar
Region / Areas Mentioned:
Kachin State; Shan State; Rakhine State; Bangladesh
Topic:
Military financing; corporate ties; human rights violations
Document Type:
Fact sheet
Organization:
United Nations Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar
Institutional Context:
United Nations Human Rights Council
Key Individuals Mentioned:
Marzuki Darusman; Min Aung Hlaing; Soe Win
Military Organization Referenced:
Tatmadaw
Companies Referenced:
Myanmar Economic Holdings Limited (MEHL); Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC)
Subject:
Business networks and financial resources used by the Myanmar military to support operations linked to persecution of ethnic groups
Related Events:
2017 clearance operations in Rakhine State; forced displacement of Rohingya population
International Issues Addressed:
Corporate responsibility; sanctions; arms embargo; international human rights law; international humanitarian law
Audience:
International community; governments; companies; investors; consumers
Year of decision:
2019
Jurisdiction:
Hong Kong
Subject:
Profits tax, special annual bonus, preferential dividends
Document type:
Court decision / Tax appeal ruling
Panel members:
Cissy K S Lam (chairman), Law Chung Ming Lewis, Richard Zimmern
Hearing dates:
23-24 May 2019
Decision date:
3 December 2019
Appellant:
Company operating a funeral parlour
Legal provisions:
Sections 16, 17, 68(4), (8), (9) and Part 1 of Schedule 5 of IRO (Chapter 112)
Relevant years:
2000/01–2011/12
Counsel for appellant:
Caspar Ng
Counsel for Commissioner:
Julian Lam
Key issues:
Deductibility of special annual bonus, characterization as preferential dividends, expenses “in the production of profits”
Outcome:
Appeal dismissed, costs of $25,000 imposed
Year:
2019
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
National Register of Historic Places regulations
Document Type:
Comment Letter
Organization / institution:
American Institute of Architects (AIA), Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation
Author:
Kara Kempski, Sara C. Bronin
Target Audience:
Government officials, preservationists, architects, and public stakeholders
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year
Theme:
Payroll, Employee Benefits, Government Services
Document Type:
FAQ
Agency / Institution:
GSA Payroll Services Branch
Target Audience:
GSA Employees, Federal Employees
Context:
FAQ document providing detailed answers to common employee inquiries about using the Employee Express (EEX) system for payroll and benefits.
Year:
2007-2016
Organization:
NVM Express, Inc.
Document Type:
Technical Errata
Specification Version:
NVM Express™ 1.2.1
Errata ID:
003
Revision Date:
12/16/2016
Authors:
Dave Landsman (WD), Christoph Hellwig (WD), Frank Chu (WD), Judy Brock (Samsung), Keith Busch (Intel), Fred Knight (NetApp)
Region:
International
Scope:
NVMe specification clarifications and corrections
Year:
2026
Region / City:
South Carolina
Theme:
Obituary, Resolution
Document Type:
Senate Resolution
Author:
South Carolina Senate
Target Audience:
South Carolina Senate, General Public
Period of Validity:
January 21, 2026
Approval Date:
January 21, 2026
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
South Carolina
Theme:
Memorial / Tribute
Document Type:
Senate Resolution
Organization:
South Carolina Senate
Author:
South Carolina Senate
Target Audience:
General public
Period of Action:
December 16, 2025
Date of Approval:
December 16, 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Contextual Description:
A Senate resolution mourning the passing of Nehemiah David McRant, celebrating his life, and offering condolences to his family and friends.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Durban, Richards Bay
Subject:
Enterprise and Supplier Development (ESD) Programme
Document Type:
Specification Document
Organization:
University of South Africa (UNISA)
Author:
UNISA
Target Audience:
Qualified service providers
Validity Period:
2023-2024
Approval Date:
August 2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Unified Contact Center Express Configuration
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Cisco
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
IT administrators, technical support
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
April 20, 2020
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2011
Region / City:
Hillsboro, OR
Topic:
Technical Specification
Document Type:
Specification
Organization / Institution:
Intel Corporation
Author:
Amber Huffman
Target Audience:
Technical specialists and engineers in the field of data storage and bus interface technologies
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
March 1, 2011
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Indiana, West Lafayette
Subject:
Education, Outreach, Science, STEM
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Purdue University College of Science
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
High school students, teachers, education coordinators
Period of Validity:
2017
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Pittsburgh, Malvern, New Mexico
Topic:
Mobile Network, Rail Transportation
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
Wabtec Corporation, Rajant Corporation
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Industry professionals, stakeholders in rail and mobile network sectors
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
September 23, 2020
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
Press release announcing a partnership between Wabtec and Rajant to upgrade the wireless network for New Mexico Rail Runner Express.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Clinton County
Topic:
Legal cases
Document type:
Court case record
Organization / Institution:
Clinton County
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Legal professionals, public
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Description:
Legal case record related to ongoing court proceedings involving multiple parties in Clinton County.