№ files_lp_4_process_2_61288
File format: docx
Character count: 4048
File size: 90 KB
Independent legislative review report and summary of amendments to Part 9 of the Crime (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1993 addressing procedures and powers concerning unexplained wealth and associated enforcement mechanisms.
Year:
1993
Jurisdiction:
Tasmania, Australia
Subject:
Unexplained wealth, confiscation of criminal profits
Document type:
Legislative review report
Agency:
Department of Justice, Tasmania
Author:
Mr Damian Bugg AM QC
Target audience:
Parliament, legal professionals, public stakeholders
Period of implementation:
Part 9 commenced 1 March 2014
Review date:
2017
Bill implementation date:
2018
Public consultation deadline:
27 July 2018
Key provisions:
Restraining and forfeiting property, investigations, examinations, production of documents, wealth restraining orders, Public Trustee fees
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021–2022
Institution:
University of Reading
Author:
Dr Folashade Adeyemo
Project Title:
Unexplained Wealth in Africa
Date of Award:
1st December 2021
Amount of Award:
£930
Other Funding Sources:
Society of Legal Scholars £500, University of Reading Early Career Research Fund
Event Date:
29th June 2022
Event Type:
Virtual Webinar
Participants:
Approximately 406 from over 60 countries
Focus Region:
Global South
Purpose:
Review and evaluate unexplained wealth legislation in multiple jurisdictions
Publication Plan:
Edited collection in November 2023
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Food Cost Management
Document Type:
Operational Guideline
Organization / Institution:
KITCHENProfit
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Restaurant Managers and Staff
Effective Period:
Current operational procedures
Date Approved:
Not specified
Date Modified:
Not specified
Related Processes:
Inventory management, invoice posting, recipe accuracy
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Broadland, United Kingdom
Subject:
School safety, child protection, and behaviour management
Document type:
Policy
Organization:
Ormiston Academies Trust
Author:
Jane Nolan, Director of Inclusion – Behaviour, SEND, Safeguarding and Mental Health
Approved by:
OAT Executive
Release date:
April 2024
Review schedule:
In line with OAT internal policy schedule or when new legislation is introduced
New sections:
4.15–4.17 on guidance for use of sniffer dogs
Legislation referenced:
Education Act 1996, Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, Equality Act 2010, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, and other statutory guidance
Associated policies:
Child Protection and Safeguarding, Behaviour, Allegations against staff, Whistleblowing
Audience:
Staff, children, and parents
Context:
Applies to searches, screenings, and confiscations on academy premises including school trips
Document type:
Practice note
Reference number:
PNCLD 7–2020
Division:
Common Law Division
Reviewed by:
His Honour Judge Dyer, Judge in charge of the Confiscation List
Authorised by:
His Honour Judge Dyer, Judge in charge of the Confiscation List
Note:
Release history
Version:
1.0
Date:
01/07/20
Author:
Judge Dyer
Summary of changes:
Supersedes Reference No. PNCLD 2–2018
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Legal Practice Note
Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Target Audience:
Legal practitioners, parties involved in Confiscation List proceedings
Period of Application:
Ongoing, from 01/07/2020
Date of Approval:
01/07/2020
Date of Revisions:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Tax law, Corporate taxation
Document Type:
Legal Analysis
Agency / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Tax professionals, Corporate entities
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Region / City:
United States, Houston
Subject:
Sales strategy, Customer service, Cross-selling
Document type:
Case study
Organization / Institution:
Pony Express Bank
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Business professionals, management
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Case No.:
D13/21
Jurisdiction:
Hong Kong
Subject Matter:
Profits tax – source of profits – offshore profits claim
Type of Document:
Board of Review decision
Relevant Legislation:
Inland Revenue Ordinance (sections 2, 14(1), 66, 68(4), (8), (9), Part 1 of Schedule 5)
Panel:
Chui Pak Ming Norman (chairman), Chung Koon Ying, Louis, Ng Cheuk Ping, Charmaine
Date of Hearing:
24 June 2021; 2 September 2021
Date of Decision:
17 December 2021
Appellant:
Private company incorporated in Hong Kong
Respondent:
Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Tax Year in Dispute:
2016/17 (with provisional tax for 2017/18)
Assessable Profits (Original):
HK$360,000
Tax Payable (Original):
HK$39,400
Assessable Profits (Revised):
HK$145,241
Tax Payable (Revised):
HK$5,991
Amount of Costs Ordered:
HK$25,000
Outcome:
Appeal dismissed; Revised Profits Tax Assessment confirmed
Key Issue:
Whether the Subject Profits were sourced offshore or arose in or were derived from Hong Kong
Related Activities:
Acquisition and sale of blinds and accessories; installation works; manufacturing by third party in the Mainland
Year:
2009
Region / City:
Florida
Subject:
Lost Profits, Legal Claims
Document Type:
Legal Precedent
Organization / Institution:
Florida Courts
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Reference:
20855
Telephone:
6271 6270
e-mail:
[email protected]
Note:
Mr Robert Raether
Date:
25 January 2017
Document Type:
Regulation Impact Statement
Subject:
Diverted Profits Tax
Author:
Chris Toyne
Target Audience:
Decision Makers in Government
Period of Action:
Until final decision
Approval Date:
25 January 2017
Amendment Date:
N/A
Description:
A formal communication providing feedback on a Regulation Impact Statement related to a diverted profits tax.
Year:
2019
Date:
16 September 2019
Country:
Myanmar
Region / Areas Mentioned:
Kachin State; Shan State; Rakhine State; Bangladesh
Topic:
Military financing; corporate ties; human rights violations
Document Type:
Fact sheet
Organization:
United Nations Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar
Institutional Context:
United Nations Human Rights Council
Key Individuals Mentioned:
Marzuki Darusman; Min Aung Hlaing; Soe Win
Military Organization Referenced:
Tatmadaw
Companies Referenced:
Myanmar Economic Holdings Limited (MEHL); Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC)
Subject:
Business networks and financial resources used by the Myanmar military to support operations linked to persecution of ethnic groups
Related Events:
2017 clearance operations in Rakhine State; forced displacement of Rohingya population
International Issues Addressed:
Corporate responsibility; sanctions; arms embargo; international human rights law; international humanitarian law
Audience:
International community; governments; companies; investors; consumers
Year of decision:
2019
Jurisdiction:
Hong Kong
Subject:
Profits tax, special annual bonus, preferential dividends
Document type:
Court decision / Tax appeal ruling
Panel members:
Cissy K S Lam (chairman), Law Chung Ming Lewis, Richard Zimmern
Hearing dates:
23-24 May 2019
Decision date:
3 December 2019
Appellant:
Company operating a funeral parlour
Legal provisions:
Sections 16, 17, 68(4), (8), (9) and Part 1 of Schedule 5 of IRO (Chapter 112)
Relevant years:
2000/01–2011/12
Counsel for appellant:
Caspar Ng
Counsel for Commissioner:
Julian Lam
Key issues:
Deductibility of special annual bonus, characterization as preferential dividends, expenses “in the production of profits”
Outcome:
Appeal dismissed, costs of $25,000 imposed