№ lp_1_00145
File format: docx
Character count: 248912
File size: 205 KB
This document outlines specific requirements and exceptions for submitting offers under various GSA Schedules, with an emphasis on service contracts, modifications, and exclusions in the context of facilities maintenance and management.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Federal procurement and contract management
Document Type:
Policy/Guidance
Agency / Institution:
GSA (General Services Administration)
Author:
GSA
Target Audience:
Contractors, Government Agencies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Boston
Subject:
Software Quality, Testing, and Security Management
Document Type:
Syllabus
Institution:
Boston University
Author:
Alex Elentukh
Target Audience:
Graduate students in software engineering
Duration:
Fall 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Newcastle
Topic:
Special Education Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision
Document Type:
Guidance / Informational report
Issuing Authority:
Local Authority of Newcastle
Target Audience:
Educators, school administrators, parents of children with SEND
Education Levels:
Early years, primary, secondary, post-16
Support Types:
SEN Support, Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plans, Additionally Resourced Provisions (ARP)
Related Services:
Health, Social Care, Early Help services
Reference Links:
https://www.newcastlesupportdirectory.org.uk
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United States
Subject:
Government contracting
Document type:
Solicitation Guidelines
Organization / institution:
GSA
Author:
GSA
Target audience:
Contractors, procurement officers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
UK
Topic:
Hazardous Waste Management Services
Document type:
Invitation to Tender (ITT)
Organization:
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
Author:
Rahul Malde
Target audience:
Potential suppliers
Period of validity:
Until 30th January 2026
Approval date:
05/01/2026
Modification date:
None
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Europe
Theme:
Interference, Meteorological Radar, 5 GHz RLAN
Document type:
Report
Organization:
ECC (Electronic Communications Committee)
Author:
ECC WGFM (Working Group Frequency Management)
Target audience:
National enforcement authorities, market surveillance authorities, industry stakeholders
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Date of approval:
2017
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Winnipeg
Theme:
Municipal governance, Public events, Community engagement
Document Type:
Meeting minutes
Authority / Organization:
Winnipeg City Council
Author:
Mayor Bowman
Target Audience:
Local community, City officials, Council members
Effective Period:
2017
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2024
Location:
Alabama, USA
Topic:
Mining, Coal Transportation
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
Warrior Met Coal, BEUMER Group
Author:
Verena Breuer, Carsten Otte (Agency)
Project Scope:
Design and supply of a single-flight curved overland conveyor for 1,500 STPH capacity
Conveyor Length:
14 km (9 miles)
Expected Operation Start:
End of 2025
Target Audience:
Industry stakeholders, investors, media
Key Features:
18 horizontal curves, nine load-sharing drives, elevated sections to minimize earthworks
Technology:
Troughed belt conveyor, VFDs, MCCs, PLC control systems
Year:
2019
Location:
Exeter, United Kingdom
Event:
CCI-CMUG Integration Meeting
Type of document:
Meeting agenda and session notes
Organizers:
Met Office, Climate Change Initiative (CCI), Climate Modelling User Group (CMUG)
Chairs:
Kate Salmon, Paul Van Der Linden
Rapporteurs:
Kate Salmon, Paul Van Der Linden, additional participants
Audience:
Climate scientists, ECV researchers
Date:
6-7 November 2019
Main activities:
Presentations, icebreaker exercises, ECV interaction exercises, group discussions
Focus:
Coordination and collaboration on Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) and climate system research
Outcome:
Identification of overlaps, communication strategies, and collaboration opportunities among ECVs
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Washington Crossing Park Estates, Titusville, NJ
Subject:
Drinking water monitoring violations
Document Type:
Public Notice
Organization:
Washington Crossing Park Estates
Author:
Chris Beyer
Target Audience:
Residents of Washington Crossing Park Estates
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
02/05/2026
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Water System ID:
NJ1106001
Description:
Public notice regarding violations in regular water testing for E. coli at Washington Crossing Park Estates, outlining corrective actions and health advisory for at-risk groups.
Organisation:
The Met
Type of document:
Job description and applicant information pack
Role:
Education and Learning Officer
Contract type:
Fixed-term contract
Period of contract:
Until July 2025
Location:
Bury, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Sector:
Arts and culture
Organisation type:
Registered charity and company limited by guarantee
Responsible department:
Education and Learning Programme
Accountable to:
Education and Learning Manager
Immediate supervisor:
Education and Learning Manager
Immediate subordinates:
Freelance artists and practitioners
Working hours:
3 days per week
Remuneration:
£18,685 per annum (pro rata to £11,211 for 3 days per week)
Holiday entitlement:
23 days per year plus bank holidays (pro rata)
Qualifications required:
GCSE level education; Level 3 arts-related qualification desirable
Organisation staff size:
16 permanent staff and 5 casual staff
Volunteer involvement:
More than 100 volunteers annually
Main activity areas:
Music, theatre, comedy, community workshops, recording studio, outreach programme, creative business hub
Associated event:
Head for the Hills Festival
Visitor activity:
More than 100,000 annual restaurant visitors
Employer status:
Accredited Real Living Wage employer
Accessibility policy:
Inclusive recruitment process with guaranteed interview for eligible candidates with protected characteristics
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Leadership, Compassionate Leadership, Burnout, Healthcare
Document Type:
Podcast Transcript
Organization / Institution:
You Are Not A Frog
Author:
Steve Andrews, Rachel Morris
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, healthcare workers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Research Institution:
ATCC, Lonza BioResearch
Cell Lines:
EBC1, NCI-H358, NHBE
Experimental Techniques:
Cell viability assay, apoptosis detection, antibody trafficking, HDX epitope mapping, surface plasmon resonance, luciferase reporter assay
Target Protein:
Human MET receptor
Antibodies:
METxMET biparatopic, parental antibodies Ab1 and Ab2
Equipment:
Accuri C6 flow cytometer, Zeiss spinning disk confocal microscope, Waters SYNAPT G2-Si H/DX-MS, Biacore T200
Data Analysis Software:
DynamX 3.0, ProteinLynx Global Server, Scrubber 2.0c
Experimental Conditions:
PBS buffer, HBS-ET buffer, 25°C for SPR assays
Assay Duration:
5–15 minutes depending on experiment
Date of birth:
09/21/1999
Region / city:
Alberta, Canada
Theme:
Personal accounts
Document type:
Correspondence
Institution:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
FBI officials
Action period:
1995–1999
Date of approval:
09/21/1999
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Bangkok, Thailand
Topic:
Meteorology, Air Navigation, Environmental Initiatives
Document Type:
Information Paper
Organization:
International Civil Aviation Organization
Author:
ICAO Secretariat
Target Audience:
Meteorologists, Air Navigation Professionals, Environmental Experts
Effective Period:
18 - 22 August 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Location:
Mexico City, Mexico
Theme:
Aeronautical Meteorology Implementation
Document Type:
Meeting Report / Information Paper
Organization:
North American, Central American and Caribbean Working Group (NACC/WG)
Author:
Not specified
Strategic Objectives:
Safety; Air Navigation Capacity and Efficiency; Security & Facilitation; Economic Development of Air Transport; Environmental Protection
Date of Meeting:
9–12 December 2025
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Washington
Topic:
Road Safety, Litter Prevention
Document Type:
Public Awareness Campaign
Agency:
Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of Transportation
Author:
Washington State Agencies
Target Audience:
Drivers, Motorists, General Public
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year Group
Year:
2026
Region / city:
UK
Subject:
Electric Vehicle Charge Points, Heat Pumps, and connection procedures
Document Type:
Application form
Organization / institution:
Distribution Network Operators (DNOs)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Individuals or entities installing electric vehicle charge points (EVCP) or heat pumps (HP)
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified