№ files_lp_4_process_3_132001
File format: docx
Character count: 1022
File size: 17 KB
Structured training session plan for educators using learner profiles to adapt or develop online educational resources, including group activities and discussions.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Online Education and Learner Profiles
Document Type:
Training Activity Outline
Organization / Institution:
The Open University
Author:
TIDE Project Team
Target Audience:
Educators and Trainers
Duration:
90 minutes
Session Parts:
Part 1 (25 minutes), Part 2 (65 minutes)
Focus:
Adapting and developing OERs based on learner needs
Materials:
Learner profiles, paper, flipcharts
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Florida
Subject:
Education, Student Assessment
Document Type:
Parent Notification
Institution:
SSMS (School)
Author:
Mrs. Brandy Chemnitz
Target Audience:
Parents/Guardians of 6th-8th Grade Students
Effective Period:
September 4th – 15th, 2023
Approval Date:
N/A
Revision Date:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Hutchings Farm
Topic:
Homeowners Association Board Meeting Minutes
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization / Institution:
Hutchings Farm Homeowners Association
Author:
Board Members
Target Audience:
Homeowners Association Members
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
July 6, 2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Contextual Description:
Minutes of a closed meeting documenting decisions and elections of officers within the Hutchings Farm Homeowners Association.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Canberra
Subject:
Executive Meeting
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization:
ANUSA
Author:
Charley (President)
Target Audience:
ANUSA Executive members and related stakeholders
Period of Action:
December 2022
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Pharmacy, Primary Care, General Practice
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organization / Institution:
Royal Pharmaceutical Society
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Pharmacy professionals, General Practitioners, Healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
Until March 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Virtual Meeting
Topic:
Primary Care Pharmacy, Professional Indemnity, Royal College Status, NHSE and ICB Changes
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organization:
Royal Pharmaceutical Society
Authors:
Alex Leung, Hadeel Mohamed, Jennifer Weston, Mohammad Rahman, Nazir Hussain, Raj Bajwa, Rosemary Furner, Stacey Middlemass, Tomazo Kallis, Neal Patel, Heidi Wright, Yvonne Dennington
Target Audience:
Pharmacy professionals, RPS members
Effective Period:
20 May 2023
Approval Date:
20 May 2023
Modification Date:
None
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Swansea Bay
Topic:
Quality and Safety
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization:
Swansea Bay University Health Board
Author:
Quality and Safety Committee
Target Audience:
Health Board members, healthcare professionals
Period of Effect:
October 2024
Approval Date:
Not stated
Date of Changes:
Not stated
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Bowling Green
Theme:
Student Governance, Campus Activities, Election, Mental Health
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization / Institution:
WKU Student Government Association
Author:
Senate Speaker Sarah Vincent
Target Audience:
WKU students, faculty, and staff
Period of Effectiveness:
September 10th, 2024
Date of Approval:
September 10th, 2024
Date of Changes:
None
Context:
Official minutes of the Senate meeting held by the WKU Student Government Association, detailing discussions and reports on various student and campus issues.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Pharmacy, Primary Care
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda and Notes
Organization:
Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS)
Author:
Anne Thomson
Target Audience:
Primary care pharmacy professionals, RPS members
Period of Validity:
26 September 2023
Approval Date:
26 September 2023
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Oak Island, North Carolina
Topic:
Local government, zoning ordinances, public hearing
Document Type:
Meeting minutes
Organization:
Oak Island Town Council
Author:
Oak Island Town Council
Target Audience:
Local residents, town officials, stakeholders in zoning matters
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
March 8, 2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Location:
Academic Senate Conference Room (AS 125)
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Long Beach, California
Subject:
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization / Institution:
California State University, Long Beach (CSULB)
Author:
J. Pandya, N. Hultgren, M. Aliasgari, N. Meyer-Adams, C. Cummings, P. Hung, D. Stewart, N. Schürer, K. Janousek, E. Klink, P. Soni, J. Phillips, D. Hamm, K. Bonetati, J. Hamilton, S. Apel, B. Jersky, J. Cormack, A. Kinsey
Target Audience:
Faculty, Academic Senate, Executive Committee members
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
August 27, 2019
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Africa
Theme:
Youth Employability Skills, Digital Content
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization / Institution:
Commonwealth Association of Technical Universities & Polytechnics in Africa (CAPA-ATUPA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
CAPA-ATUPA members, youth training and development professionals
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Malting Industry, Board Meeting
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization:
Craft Maltsters Guild
Target Audience:
Board Members, Guild Members
Context Description:
Meeting minutes of the Craft Maltsters Guild Board of Directors held on July 10, 2018, discussing various industry topics and planning for future events and training.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
New York City
Topic:
Documentary, Politics, History, Vietnam War
Document Type:
Documentary Film
Organization:
PBS, American Experience
Author:
Marc Levin, Daphne Pinkerson
Target Audience:
General Public, History and Politics Enthusiasts
Period of Action:
May 8, 1970
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Nairobi
Theme:
Employment and Labour Relations
Document Type:
Cause List
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Court participants, Employers, and Employees
Period of Validity:
29 October 2024
Approval Date:
29 October 2024
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Lorena, TX
Subject:
Economic Development
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organization / Institution:
Lorena Economic Development Corporation
Author:
Monica Hendrix, Lorena City Secretary
Target Audience:
Board Members, City Council, Public
Period of Action:
June 11, 2024
Approval Date:
June 7, 2024
Changes Date:
None
Context:
A meeting agenda for the Lorena Economic Development Corporation detailing scheduled discussions, actions, and reports to be presented at their regular meeting.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Camber
Topic:
Local Governance
Document Type:
Meeting Agenda
Organization:
Camber Parish Council
Author:
Camber Parish Council
Target Audience:
Local Council Members, Public
Period of Action:
20th January 2026
Approval Date:
20th January 2026
Date of Changes:
20th January 2026
Context:
Official meeting agenda for Camber Parish Council, including topics such as financial matters, public questions, and council reports, for a meeting scheduled on 20th January 2026.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Manchester
Theme:
Security services, Licensing
Document type:
Consultation questionnaire
Organ / Institution:
Home Office
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Security professionals, Employers, Public bodies
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
HIV treatment, healthcare program
Document type:
Official publication
Organization / Institution:
Victorian Government, Department of Health
Author:
Victorian Government
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, HIV patients, healthcare policy makers
Date of approval:
August 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified
Reference no:
HPV (GBMSM) PGD
Version no:
v5.0
Valid from:
1 September 2025
Review date:
1 April 2028
Expiry date:
1 September 2028
Author:
Suki Hunjunt, Sharif Ismail, David Green
Region / city:
England
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners administering HPV vaccine to GBMSM
Type of document:
Patient Group Direction
Organisation:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Date of approval:
17 July 2025
Date of modifications:
16 July 2025
Context:
A formal Patient Group Direction for the administration of HPV vaccine to GBMSM, detailing legal, clinical, and procedural requirements for healthcare practitioners in England.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters