№ lp_2_3_05597
File format: docx
Character count: 20133
File size: 2747 KB
The document outlines the activities and achievements of the Primary Care Division in Wales during the 2022/2023 fiscal year, focusing on public health improvements through primary and community care, including obesity prevention and dental health reforms.
Year:
2022/2023
Region / City:
Wales
Theme:
Primary care, public health, dental health
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Primary Care Division
Author:
Primary Care Division
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, policymakers, public health experts
Period of Validity:
2022/2023
Approval Date:
March 2023
Amendment Date:
None
Keywords:
Primary care, public health, prevention, obesity, diabetes, dental health, cluster development, Wales
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2022/2023
Region / City:
LaSE
Topic:
Trainee Pharmacist Education, Community Pharmacy
Document Type:
Workbook
Organization:
Health Education England (HEE)
Author:
Health Education England (HEE)
Target Audience:
Trainee Pharmacists
Period of Action:
Foundation Training Year 2022/2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022/2023
Region / City:
South Africa
Theme:
Graduate Programme, Municipal Infrastructure
Document Type:
Application Form
Organ / Institution:
MISA (Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent)
Author:
MISA
Target Audience:
Young Graduates
Period of Validity:
2022/2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022/2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Thesis proposal, Graduate studies
Document Type:
Academic regulation
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Graduate students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022/2023
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Graduate Studies
Document Type:
Academic Regulation
Target Audience:
Graduate Students, Academic Staff
Year:
2022/2023
Program:
Master’s Degree
Department:
Graduate Studies
Research Methodology:
Detailed description of research methods required for evaluation
Thesis Proposal:
Form for submitting research project proposal
Supervisor Approval:
Acknowledgement of project originality and relevance
Proposal Defense Committee:
Members and signature for thesis proposal defense
Defense Date:
Date for the thesis proposal defense
Defense Place:
Location for defense presentation
Committee Recommendation:
Evaluation of thesis proposal quality
Official Approvals:
Signatures from department heads and deans for final approval
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Warsaw
Topic:
Scholarships
Document type:
Application form
Organization / Institution:
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Author:
SWPS University
Target audience:
International candidates applying for scholarships
Period of validity:
Academic year 2022/2023
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Context:
Application form for a recruitment competition at SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities for international candidates.
Organization:
Greater Lowell Health Alliance of CHNA 10
Document Type:
Mid-Project Report Form
Program:
Community Health Initiatives Grant
Reporting Period:
2022/2023
Report Due Date:
March 2023
Project Completion Deadline:
September 30, 2023
Location:
Lowell, MA
Contact Person:
Amanda Clermont, Director of Community Engagement & Education
Address:
295 Varnum Ave., Lowell, MA 01854
Email:
[email protected]
Subject:
Project activities, metrics, evaluation, and compliance requirements
Funding Requirements:
Attribution to GLHA of CHNA 10 required on all published materials
Submission Method:
Complete evaluation submitted to GLHA
Year:
2022/2023
Region:
North East Lincolnshire
Country:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Armed Forces community support and covenant implementation
Document Type:
Annual progress report
Organisation:
North East Lincolnshire Armed Forces Liaison Group
Related Strategy:
North East Lincolnshire Armed Forces Strategy and Action Plan
Reporting Period:
2022/23
Date of Covenant Signing:
6 June 2023
Legislative Framework:
Armed Forces Act 2021
Key Partners:
North East Lincolnshire Council; Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Trust; NAViGO; SSAFA; Combat Stress; Phillips 66; Wilkin Chapman Solicitors
Major Event:
Armed Forces Weekend, 16–18 June 2023
Attached Document:
Action Plan 2023–2028 (pending agreement)
Faculty:
Faculty of Commerce
Academic Year:
2022/2023
Semester:
Semester Two
Date:
February 08, 2023
Programme:
Bachelor of Commerce
Years Covered:
Year One; Year Two; Year Three
Study Mode:
Blended (Online and On-Campus Physical Lectures)
Examination Period:
May 22 – June 11, 2023
Courses Listed:
Fundamental Accounting Principles; Business Environment; Fundamentals of Information Communication Technology; Business Communication Skills; Macro Economics; Business Research Skills; Introduction to Taxation; Financial Management; Principles of Purchasing & Supply Chain Management; Quantitative Methods (Audited Course); Field Attachment; Ugandan Economy; Strategic Management; Cost & Management Accounting; Performance Management; Income Tax; Monetary Policy & Portfolio Analysis; Finance for International Business; Sales Force Management; International Marketing
Document Type:
Academic timetable and teaching almanac
Year:
2022/2023
Region:
Sussex, England
Country:
United Kingdom
Document Type:
Commissioning and funding framework
Issuing Authority:
Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner
Office Holder:
Katy Bourne OBE
Policy Context:
Police and Crime Plan up to 2024
Funding Source:
Ministry of Justice grant
Subject:
Commissioning of victim and witness support services
Target Sector:
Voluntary Community and Social Enterprise (VCSE)
Eligibility:
Not-for-profit organisations providing free and confidential services
Geographical Scope of Services:
Core provision in Sussex
Monitoring Framework:
Quality assurance matrix and outcome measures
Effective Period:
Financial year 2022/2023
Year:
2022/2023
Region / City:
Polk County, Florida
Subject:
Volunteer application for ReadingPals program
Document type:
Application form
Organization:
The United Way of Central Florida
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Individuals interested in volunteering for ReadingPals
Effective period:
2022/2023 school year
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2022/2023
Region / City:
Polk County, Florida
Topic:
Early Literacy, Volunteer Program
Document Type:
Application Form
Author:
United Way of Central Florida
Target Audience:
New Volunteer Applicants for ReadingPals Program
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Contextual Description:
Application form for individuals wishing to volunteer for the ReadingPals program in Polk County, Florida, focusing on early literacy and social-emotional development of young children.
Year:
2022/2023
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
School Services
Document Type:
Order Form
Target Audience:
Parents
Description:
Order form for school-related services including meals, transport, and extracurricular activities for children.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Rome
Subject:
Personal data processing, scholarships, academic award
Document type:
Privacy information
Organization / Institution:
Tor Vergata University of Rome
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Students enrolled in MSc European Economy and Business Law at Tor Vergata University
Effective period:
Until the purpose is achieved or as required by law
Approval date:
11/02/2025
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2022/2023
Reporting period:
1 July 2022 – 31 March 2023
Organisation:
LLR Integrated Care Board (LLR ICB)
Region:
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Document type:
Workforce equality monitoring report
Subject:
Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES)
Legal framework:
NHS Standard Contract; Equality Act 2010; Public Sector Equality Duty
Policy references:
We are the NHS: People Plan 2020/21 – action for us all; Workforce Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Improvement Plan (June 2023); Equality Delivery System 2022
Data sources:
Electronic Staff Records (ESR); NHS Staff Survey; 2021 Census
Workforce size:
339 staff (as at 31 March 2023)
BME population (LLR area):
27.5%
Proportion of BME staff:
31.6%
Proportion of staff self-reporting ethnicity:
89.3%
Indicators covered:
Nine WRES indicators including representation across AfC Bands 1–9 and VSM
Status of requirement:
Voluntary submission for ICBs
Baseline status:
First-year baseline analysis for newly constituted organisation
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
MM/DD/YYYY
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Environmental Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Environmental Review Checklist
Agency / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Project Managers, Environmental Consultants
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified