№ files_lp_4_process_1_32233
File format: docx
Character count: 3013
File size: 22 KB
The document outlines a guide for conducting semi-structured interviews with key staff involved in the implementation of Community Health Worker (CHW) programs, focusing on various aspects such as organizational history, supervision, training, performance, and development.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Document type:
Semi-structured focus group discussion questionnaires
Annex:
7
Assessment type:
Rapid health assessment
Target groups:
Artisanal and small-scale gold miners; Family members of artisanal and small-scale gold miners
Methodology:
Focus group discussion (FGD)
Thematic focus:
General health issues; Health-seeking behaviour; Health risk perceptions; Occupational risks in ASGM; Health promotion; Social, demographic and economic information
Sector:
Health
Industry focus:
Artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM)
Data collection method:
Group interview with structured and open-ended questions
Intended respondents:
Community members involved in ASGM and their families
Sections included:
FGD information; General health issues and behaviour; Health risks in ASGM; Health promotion activities; Social and economic information; Interviewer observations
Year:
2021
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML)
Document Type:
Research Data
Institution / Organization:
Self-funded
Author:
Mariola Marzouk
Target Audience:
Academic researchers, financial professionals, law enforcement, policymakers
Duration:
April 2020 - August 2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Project:
Next Generation of Enhanced Employment Strategies (NextGen) Project
Instrument:
Instrument 8
Document type:
Semi-structured program discussion guide
Conducting organization:
Mathematica
Commissioning body:
Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Partner agency (for selected sites):
Social Security Administration
Legal framework:
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)
OMB control number:
0970-0545
OMB expiration date:
04/30/2023
Purpose:
Evaluation of innovative employment programs serving individuals facing challenges to employment and economic independence
Target respondents:
Program leadership, supervisors, front line staff, key partners
Estimated public reporting burden:
45–90 minutes per response
Data collection method:
Recorded semi-structured interviews
Confidentiality provisions:
Individual responses kept private and reported in aggregate form
Contact email:
[email protected]
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) practices and their transformations
Document Type:
Interview Guide
Author:
Alidina et al., Goldman et al., Helfrich et al., Janamian et al.
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals involved in PCMH transformations
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Interview guide
Research design:
Qualitative study
Data collection method:
Semi-structured interviews
Target population:
Women with history of GDM and their spouses
Health condition:
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Related condition:
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Institution:
National University of Singapore (NUS)
Topic areas:
Pregnancy experience, postpartum health, lifestyle changes, healthcare interactions, risk perception, technology-based interventions
Intervention focus:
App-based and wearable-supported lifestyle modification
Reporting framework referenced:
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR)
Source of reporting standards:
EQUATOR Network
Sections included:
Interview guide for women; Interview guide for spouses; Reporting standards checklist
Program Name:
SEHER (Strengthening Evidence Base on School-Based Interventions for Promoting Adolescent Health)
Document Type:
Semi-structured interview guide
Target Population:
Students who availed counselling service
Intervention Setting:
School-based program
Focus Area:
Adolescent health and counselling services
Purpose:
To understand students’ experiences, enablers and barriers to accessing counselling, and feedback on the program
Key Topics:
School environment, counselling experience, access barriers, challenges, program improvement
Intended Respondents:
Current and dropped-out counselling service users
Data Collection Method:
Individual interview
Document Type:
Semi-structured interview guide
Research Focus:
Family caregivers’ experiences and perceptions of intrathecal analgesic pump implantation
Core Theme:
Value and experience of epidural pain pump implantation
Target Population:
Family caregivers of patients undergoing intrathecal analgesic pump implantation
Methodology:
Qualitative interview
Interview Duration:
Approximately 40–50 minutes
Key Topics:
Expectations and decision-making; perceived value and change; necessity and timing; care practices and support needs
Medical Context:
Pain management through intrathecal analgesic pump implantation
Setting:
Clinical decision-making and postoperative care context
Data Use:
Analysis of caregiver perspectives for research purposes
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Public health intervention, syringe exchange programs
Document Type:
Research study supplement
Organization:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, public health professionals, community partners
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Document type:
Interview guide
Research method:
Semi-structured interview
Thematic focus:
Resilience, coping strategies, personal challenges
Subject area:
Psychology; Social research
Research topic:
Individual responses to stressful life events
Interview format:
Open-ended questions with follow-up prompts
Data collection method:
Qualitative interview
Participants:
Individuals sharing personal experiences of challenges and coping
Purpose:
Elicitation of narratives about coping methods and perceptions of resilience
Structure:
Introductory statement, narrative prompt, follow-up questions, reflective questions, closing statement
Key concepts:
Coping methods; family support; social support; spirituality; counseling; personal growth; resilience
Year:
20--
Region / City:
Georgia
Subject:
Request for Qualifications, Design-Build Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Institution / Organization:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Author:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Target Audience:
Contractors, Design-Build Firms
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Implementation of online support tools for relatives of people with bipolar disorder and psychosis
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Organization / institution:
Lancaster University, University College London, University of Liverpool, NHS Trusts
Author:
IMPART research team
Target audience:
Relatives of patients receiving NHS mental health support
Funding:
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
Ethics approval:
NHS Research Ethics Committee
Duration:
Three-year study
Method:
Interviews, audio-recorded with transcription and anonymization
Purpose:
To understand barriers, facilitators, and success factors in the implementation of the REACT toolkit
Data usage:
Inform national implementation plan, academic publication, conference presentation
Author:
Simon Moss
Institution:
Charles Darwin University (CDU), Menzies School of Health Research
Type of document:
Research ethics application sample
Target audience:
Research students
Research methods:
Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, narrative analysis
Participants:
International research students, adults, healthy community members
Locations:
Darwin, various participant-chosen locations
Number of participants:
Approximately 10–15 for interviews, 2–4 focus groups with 3–10 participants each
Analysis method:
Thematic analysis, constructivist grounded theory
Topics:
Experiences of international research students, evaluation of initiatives like the community wall
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Oxford
Subject:
Education, Admissions
Document Type:
Interview Guidelines
Institution:
University of Oxford
Authors:
Dalveen, Jessica Goodman, Tom Crawford, Matthew Williams, Hannah Skoda, Will Poole, Ian (Admissions Operations Team)
Target Audience:
Prospective Students
Period of Action:
2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
User experience research for health programme
Document Type:
Research protocol
Organization:
[Not specified in document]
Author:
[Not specified in document]
Target Audience:
Participants of user experience research study
Period of Validity:
[Not specified in document]
Approval Date:
[Not specified in document]
Amendment Date:
[Not specified in document]
Year:
2023
Region:
Richmond area; Hanover County, Virginia
Geographic scope:
City of Richmond and Hanover County
Subject matter:
Court administration; local court practices; professional conduct
Document type:
Committee report; interview summary
Issuing body:
Administration of Justice Committee
Related organizations:
Richmond Bar Association
Courts referenced:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division; Hanover Circuit Court; Hanover General District Court; Hanover Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
Judges referenced:
J. Overton Harris; Hugh S. Campbell; David B. Caddell; Frank G. Uvanni
Intended audience:
Attorneys and members of the local bar
Time period covered:
Annual interviews conducted in 2023
Topics addressed:
Local rules and forms; continuances; scheduling practices; courtroom decorum; remote hearings; professional development; guardian ad litem practice
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Employee exit process, feedback collection
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Line managers, HR personnel
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Institution / Organization:
University of Canterbury
Target Audience:
Participants in the research
Document type:
Technical guidance
Thematic area:
Humanitarian shelter and displacement
Methodology:
Focus Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews
Target population:
Affected populations, IDPs, refugees, host communities
Geographic scope:
Humanitarian contexts
Institutional reference:
CRS
Referenced standard:
Sphere Standards
Referenced publication:
Focus Group Discussions – A Practical Guide (2018)
Assistance scope:
Emergency, transitional, and permanent shelter options
Source type:
Operational guidance document