№ lp_2_3_18596
File format: docx
Character count: 10768
File size: 29 KB
Provides detailed guidelines on the affiliation process, fees, and requirements for educational institutions seeking affiliation or renewal of affiliation with the Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Pakistan
Subject:
Education
Document Type:
FAQ
Institution:
Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (FBISE)
Author:
FBISE
Target Audience:
Educational institutions seeking affiliation with FBISE
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2015
Institution:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Department:
Anthropology
Type of document:
Dissertation
Author:
Valerie Joseph
Degree:
Doctor of Philosophy
Advisor:
Robert Paynter
Committee Members:
Amanda Walker Johnson, Kevin Quashie, Tom Leatherman
Region / Location of study:
Carriacou, Grenada
Audience:
Academic researchers and scholars in anthropology and African diasporic studies
Copyright:
© Valerie Joseph 2015
Period of fieldwork:
Approximately 3 years
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Soccer, Insurance, Sports Associations
Document Type:
Informational
Organization / Institution:
United States Adult Soccer Association (USASA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Adult soccer leagues, teams, coaches, managers, players
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Description:
This document outlines the benefits and services provided to leagues affiliated with the United States Adult Soccer Association and U.S. Soccer, including insurance coverage, legal protections, training programs, and access to various events and competitions.
Note:
(If there are multiple corresponding authors then nominate one for communication with the editorial office.)Received date; Revised date; Editorial decision date.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Papua New Guinea
Theme:
Higher Education, Affiliation, Accreditation
Document Type:
Policy
Institution:
Divine Word University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Higher Education Institutions in Papua New Guinea
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
March 2007, June 2011, June 2014, June 2017, June 2020, November 2023
Last Review Date:
November 2023
Next Review Due:
April 2026
Year:
2009
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Medical Education Affiliation
Document Type:
Agreement
Institution:
Hospital A, Hospital B
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Medical Institutions, Healthcare Providers
Period of Action:
July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
London, UK; Lausanne, CH
Topic:
Cavitation, Hydraulics, Fluid Dynamics
Document Type:
Research Paper
Institution:
CITY, University of London; EPFL
Author:
E. Stavropoulos Vasilakis, P. Koukouvinis, M. Farhat, M. Gavaises
Target Audience:
Researchers in Fluid Dynamics, Engineering, Hydraulics
Period of Application:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Medicare Advantage, CCO, Dual Eligible, FBDE, Healthcare Integration
Document Type:
Guidance Document
Agency / Organization:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Oregon Health Authority (OHA)
Author:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Oregon Health Authority (OHA)
Target Audience:
Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs), Medicare Advantage Plans, Health Providers
Effective Period:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
USA
Topic:
Organizational Structure, Affiliation Strategy
Document Type:
Worksheet
Organization / Institution:
Western Governors University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Affiliation planners
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
20____
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Subject:
Medical Control, Ambulance Services, Hospitals
Document Type:
Agreement
Organization / Institution:
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Hospitals, Ambulance Services
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Academic Paper
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
XXX University, YYY University
Author:
First Author, Second Author, Third Author, Fourth Author
Target Audience:
Academics, Researchers, Students
Year:
2018
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Architectural Graphic Expression
Document Type:
Conference Paper Guidelines
Organization:
EGA 2018 Scientific Committee
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, Academics, Conference Participants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
XXXX
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Manuscript preparation
Document type:
Case study
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
First-name Surname, Second Author
Target audience:
Researchers and academicians
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
XXXX
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Football, Military, Affiliation
Document Type:
Instruction Notice
Agency / Institution:
Army Football Association, Army Sports Control Board
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
All Regular and Army Reserve personnel
Period of validity:
Immediate until rescinded or replaced
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Mumbai, India
Topic:
Education, Alumni Services
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization:
Tata Institute of Social Sciences
Author:
TISS-SSE
Target Audience:
Alumni
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Academic paper template
Document Type:
Template
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, academics, authors submitting manuscripts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Kyoto
Theme:
Admissions
Document type:
Evaluation form
Organization / institution:
Kyoto iUP Admissions Office
Author:
Kyoto iUP Admissions Office
Target audience:
Secondary/high school applicants and evaluators
Period of validity:
Until applicants’ screening results are announced
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A