№ files_lp_4_process_3_082221
File format: docx
Character count: 9700
File size: 34 KB
Compilation of government and organizational guidance materials, toolkits, and templates providing structured references for assessing risks, preparing organizational and staff response plans, and managing various emergencies including natural disasters, infectious diseases, and workplace crises.
Year:
2020
Region / Country:
United States
Topic:
Disaster Preparedness, Risk Assessment, Emergency Response
Document Type:
Reference Compilation / Toolkit
Issuing Organizations:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; Federal Emergency Management Agency; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; National Health Care for the Homeless Council; American Heart Association; U.S. Department of Labor; NYC Health
Authors:
Various government and nonprofit agencies
Intended Audience:
Emergency management professionals, healthcare providers, community organizations, faith-based organizations
Sections Covered:
Risk Assessment; Organization Disaster Plans; Disaster Preparedness for Staff; Infectious Diseases and Pandemics; Other Specific Emergencies
Content Sources:
Official guidelines, toolkits, technical assistance publications, after-action review reports
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Military Training, Civil Support, HAZMAT, Antiterrorism, Leadership
Document Type:
Course Description
Organization:
U.S. Army, U.S. Department of Defense
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Military Personnel, Federal Employees, International Military Students
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
South Gloucestershire
Theme:
Education, Policy
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
South Gloucestershire and Stroud College
Author:
Jordan James
Target Audience:
Students, Educators, Academic Staff
Period of Validity:
25/06/2025 - 10/04/2026
Approval Date:
25/06/2025
Review Date:
10/04/2026
Note:
Year
Theme:
Chemistry of Life
Document Type:
Study Guide
Target Audience:
Students preparing for exams
Year:
1999
Region / City:
Falkland Islands
Theme:
Immigration
Document Type:
Official Form
Organization:
Falkland Islands Government
Author:
Authorized Person
Target Audience:
Employers sponsoring work permit holders
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Toronto
Topic:
Academic Appointment, Faculty Development
Document Type:
Position Description
Organization:
University of Toronto
Author:
Department of Family and Community Medicine
Target Audience:
Faculty Members, Program Directors, Department Heads
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
February 1, 2026
Note:
Faculty Appointment Profile Form
Candidate Signature:
Not provided
DFCM Site Head or Program Director Signature:
Not provided
DFCM Division Head Signature:
Not provided
DFCM Chair Signature:
Not provided
Expiry Date:
Not provided
Jurisdiction:
Indiana, United States
Regulatory body:
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
Legal framework:
Indiana Administrative Code 170 IAC 1-5
Authority:
IC 8-1-1-3
Affected statutes:
IC 8-1-2-1; IC 8-1-2-42; IC 8-1-2-42.7; IC 8-1-2-61.5
Document type:
Administrative regulation
Subject:
Utility rate case filing requirements and definitions
Scope:
Expedited rate case petitions and related procedures
Key entities referenced:
FERC; NARUC; OUCC
Primary content:
Definitions, applicability, procedural terms, accounting and reporting standards
Effective history:
Filed Oct 28, 1998; errata Nov 22, 1999; readopted Nov 23, 2004; amended Jul 31, 2009; readopted Jun 9, 2015
Applicable parties:
Electing utilities filing rate cases
Regulatory concepts:
Base period, test periods, revenue requirements, accounting schedules, working papers
Exclusions:
Small utility filings under IC 8-1-2-61.5
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Jelenia Góra
Topic:
Erasmus Programme, Staff Training
Document Type:
Programme
Institution:
Karkonosze College in Jelenia Góra
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Participants in the Erasmus Staff Training
Duration:
1-5 September 2014
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Context:
Detailed programme for an Erasmus staff training event at Karkonosze College, with scheduled activities and visits to various institutions and locations in Jelenia Góra.
Year:
2026
Program:
Creative Capacity Grant
Target Audience:
Nonprofit arts organizations applying for grant funding
Document Type:
Guidance / Instructional Document
Organization:
National Endowment for the Arts (implied)
Content Focus:
Grant application narrative questions, organizational information, program development, leadership, community engagement
Application Level:
Levels 1-5
Word Limits:
Specified per question
Submission Method:
Online application platform
Year:
1801
Region / City:
Yorkshire, England
Theme:
Gothic, Social Conflict
Document Type:
Literary Analysis
Institution:
N/A
Author:
Emily Brontë
Target Audience:
General Readers, Literature Enthusiasts
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Bangkok, Thailand
Topic:
Asia-Pacific Telecommunity (APT) Meeting
Document Type:
Meeting Information
Organizing Body:
Asia-Pacific Telecommunity (APT)
Author:
APT Secretariat
Target Audience:
APT Members, Associate Members, Affiliate Members, International/Regional Organizations
Effective Period:
1-5 August 2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Registration Deadline:
11 July 2022
Hotel Accommodation:
Sofitel Bangkok Sukhumvit, S15 Sukhumvit Hotel, Mövenpick Hotel Sukhumvit 15, Mercure Bangkok Sukhumvit 24
Participation Requirements:
Registration for physical or virtual attendance required
Visa Requirements:
Varies by country
Meeting Platform:
APT Zoom Meeting
Year:
1970
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Literature analysis
Document type:
Text analysis
Author:
Susan Hill
Target audience:
Students, Literature scholars
Period of applicability:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of modification:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Joint venture formation
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Solicitors, legal professionals
Year:
2023
Region / city:
California
Topic:
Anti-SLAPP motions
Document type:
Legal guide
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Legal professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year
Year:
2006
Region / City:
Victoria
Theme:
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management
Document Type:
Guide
Authority / Institution:
Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (Vic)
Author:
Aboriginal Victoria
Target Audience:
Cultural heritage professionals, Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs), heritage advisors, and other stakeholders in Aboriginal heritage management
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
New South Wales
Topic:
Construction Contract Guidelines
Document Type:
User Guidance
Organization / Institution:
NSW Government
Author:
NSW Procurement Service Centre
Target Audience:
Contract drafters, legal teams, construction managers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Tamil Nadu, India
Subject:
Coastal resilience, biodiversity conservation, blue finance
Document type:
Terms of Reference
Agency / institution:
The World Bank, Government of Tamil Nadu
Author:
The World Bank, Government of Tamil Nadu
Target audience:
Consultants, government agencies, environmental organizations, financial institutions
Effective period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2026
Date of amendments:
None