№ lp_1_34193
File format: docx
Character count: 21502
File size: 630 KB
This document provides guidelines for drafting enforceable conditions and contingency plans for managing Aboriginal cultural heritage under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in Victoria.
Year:
2006
Region / City:
Victoria
Theme:
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management
Document Type:
Guide
Authority / Institution:
Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (Vic)
Author:
Aboriginal Victoria
Target Audience:
Cultural heritage professionals, Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs), heritage advisors, and other stakeholders in Aboriginal heritage management
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Contract Law, Bilateral Contracts, Promissory Estoppel, Unilateral Contracts
Document Type:
Legal Analysis
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Nanisivik, Nunavut
Topic:
Spill Contingency Plan
Document Type:
Plan
Organization:
Department of National Defence, Defence Construction Canada
Author:
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Target Audience:
Contractors, Facility Managers
Effective Period:
During construction and operation phases
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Document type:
Checklist
Subject:
Contingency planning for legal practices
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Professional field:
Legal practice management
Intended audience:
Legal practitioners and law firm principals
Regulatory references:
Queensland Law Society (QLS), Australian Taxation Office (ATO), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Business identifiers referenced:
Australian Business Number (ABN), Australian Company Number (ACN), Tax File Number (TFN)
Key topics:
Business continuity, incapacity and death planning, client communication, trust accounts, cybersecurity, record keeping, succession arrangements
Associated services and organisations:
LawCare, QLS Ethics & Practice Support, QLS Locum, Lexon HelpNow, Lexon Risk Team, The Law Foundation – Solicitor Helping Hand and the Benevolent Fund
Procedural scope:
Business, financial, operational, and practice management arrangements
Review cycle:
Annual review recommended
Professional compliance context:
Practising certificate holders, incorporated legal practices, partnerships, sole practitioners
Year:
2020
Region / City:
British Columbia
Subject:
Hazardous Waste Management
Document Type:
Contingency Plan
Authority:
Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
Author:
Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
Target Audience:
Applicants for hazardous waste management facility registration
Period of Validity:
Ongoing until updated
Approval Date:
June 2020
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Contingency planning, animal welfare, personnel training
Document Type:
Workshop Proceedings
Organization / Institution:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Author:
National Academies
Target Audience:
Research institutions, animal care professionals
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2016
Organization:
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Document Type:
Contingency Plan / Business Continuity Plan
Scope:
Hospital-wide / Emergency Services
Event:
Loss of Electricity
Responsible Departments:
Estates, Operations, Clinical Staff, Ward and Department Staff
Critical Areas:
Theatres, DCC, ED, Labs, Pharmacy, Patient Call Systems
Date Approved:
07/04/2016
Version:
Parts 1 to 3 & Individual Ward/Department/Team Actions
Communication Channels:
Radios, MITAL phones, Mobile phones, Switchboard
Associated Agencies:
CCG, SWAST, St John Ambulance, ARRIVA PTS
Note:
Year
Topic:
Information Systems
Document Type:
Template
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Dar es Salaam
Topic:
Disaster risk response
Document Type:
Addendum to Environmental and Social Management Framework
Organization / Institution:
World Bank, President’s Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (PoRALG), Tanzania Rural and Urban Roads Agency (TARURA)
Author:
World Bank, PoRALG
Target Audience:
Project stakeholders, Government of Tanzania, World Bank
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
December 20, 2023
Amendment Date:
August 2024
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Falls Church, VA
Topic:
Data Exchange, Military Health System, Contingency Tracking System
Document Type:
Interface Control Document (ICD)
Organization:
DHSS Program Executive Office
Author:
Ms. Karen Hass, Mr. Scott Dreisigacker, Mr. Quinn Smith, Mr. Imran Shah, Mr. Narinder Saund
Target Audience:
DHSS personnel, DMDC staff, Military Health System operators
Period of Validity:
Ongoing, with periodic updates
Approval Date:
April 12, 2012
Revision Date:
None specified
Year:
2024
Region:
Greater Chicago Sub-Area
Topic:
Environmental Protection, Contingency Planning
Document Type:
Contingency Plan
Agency:
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Author:
Paul Ruesch, On-Scene Coordinator
Target Audience:
Environmental agencies, government officials, private sector responders
Period of Effectiveness:
2024/Version 1
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
[DD Mmm YYYY]
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Humanitarian Assistance and Emergency Response
Document Type:
Contingency Plan
Organization / Institution:
Humanitarian Country Team
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
A contingency planning document outlining procedures for managing power loss in healthcare facilities, including emergency response protocols and recovery steps.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Civil Representation, Legal Aid
Document Type:
Guide
Organ / Institution:
Legal Aid Agency
Author:
Legal Aid Agency
Target Audience:
Legal Aid Providers, Barristers
Period of Action:
December 2025 – January 2026
Approval Date:
December 2025
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2012
Region / city:
North America
Subject:
Contingency Reserve, Balancing Authority, ACE Recovery
Document Type:
Comment Form
Organization / institution:
BARC SDT
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Industry professionals, Balancing Authorities, Reserve Sharing Groups
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Information Security, Cloud Services
Document Type:
Template
Organization:
FedRAMP
Author:
FedRAMP
Target Audience:
Cloud Service Providers, IT Professionals
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
06/30/2023
Date of Revisions:
12/06/2024
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Joint venture formation
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Solicitors, legal professionals
Year:
2023
Region / city:
California
Topic:
Anti-SLAPP motions
Document type:
Legal guide
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Legal professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A