№ files_lp_3_process_7_098745
File format: docx
Character count: 5707
File size: 28 KB
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Louisiana
Subject:
Children’s Literature
Document Type:
Discussion Guide
Organization / Institution:
Shreve Memorial Library
Author:
John Grandits
Target Audience:
Children, Educators
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Illustrator:
Michael Allen Austin
Other Titles by Illustrator:
Sam Patch: Daredevil Jumper, The Horned Toad Prince, Railroad John and the Red Rock Run
Related Titles:
School Bus by Donald Crews, The Energy Bus for Kids by Jon Gordon, The First Rule of Little Brothers by Jill Davis
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Disability policy
Document type:
Final report
Organization:
Victorian Government, Department of Families, Fairness and Housing
Author:
Minister for Disability, Ageing and Carers
Target audience:
People with disability, government agencies, disability advocacy groups
Period of validity:
2017–2020
Approval date:
February 2022
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2007
Region / City:
Wellpinit, Reardan
Subject:
Character analysis, coming-of-age, personal growth
Document type:
Literary analysis
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Readers of Sherman Alexie, young adult readers
Period of validity:
Not applicable
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Topic:
Special Education Law
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Bureau of Special Education Appeals
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Individuals involved in special education hearings without legal representation
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
July 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Unknown
Topic:
Personal Responsibility, Social Environment
Document Type:
Opinion / Personal Reflection
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Date:
2023-02-16
Time:
08:20 AM
Duration:
1 hour, 37 minutes, 46 seconds
Keywords:
court, frankston, government, commonwealth, crown, australia, metre, absolutely, law, victoria, health, state, parliament, monarch, united kingdom, act, king, question, section, power
Host:
Mike
Co-host:
Daryl
Topic:
Rights and freedoms in Australia, legal topics, and government actions
Audience:
General public interested in legal rights and freedoms
Broadcast number:
332
Content type:
Radio show
Country:
Australia
Language:
English
Program type:
Informational, educational
Broadcast platform:
Rat FM Network, BitChute, Facebook
Sponsors:
WebGate IT Solutions, Greener Cleaner, Alkaline Health, Verona Resort in Noosa, I Check Property Inspections, Mould Zappers, Real Health and Vitality
Target Audience:
Individuals interested in learning about legal rights and freedoms
Period:
Ongoing
Date of broadcast:
February 16, 2023
Date of next broadcast:
February 19, 2023
Context:
A radio show discussing legal rights, freedoms, and government actions, with a focus on informing and educating listeners about their rights and current events.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
RAF Valley, Anglesey, Gwynedd, North Wales
Topic:
SERE Training Delivery
Document Type:
Statement of Requirement
Organization:
Ministry of Defence
Target Audience:
Contractor personnel and military personnel
Period of Validity:
From 31 Mar 2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Game Design, Puzzle, Horror, Suspense
Document Type:
Game Design Document
Author:
Alfred Kishek, Antonio Costea, Omar El-Haik, Grant Sweeney, Jonathan Hood
Target Audience:
Mature players, gamers familiar with first-person shooters
Period of Effect:
2014 - Present
Approval Date:
December 14th, 2014
Modification Date:
None specified
Context:
This document is a game design outline detailing the development of a demo version of the maze game, including gameplay mechanics, story, and project scope.
Year:
2004
Region / city:
Cleveland, Ohio
Theme:
Endangered species, conservation
Document type:
Article
Organization / institution:
Spider Magazine
Author:
Jacqueline Adams
Target audience:
General public
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
DUI Laws, Education, Traffic Safety
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Organization / Institution:
Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education, Arizona Department of Education
Target Audience:
High School Students
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for high school students, focusing on DUI laws, traffic safety, and the consequences of driving under the influence.
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Brewing Industry, Craft Breweries
Document Type:
Industry News
Organization / Institution:
Great British Drinks Company
Author:
Roger Protz
Target Audience:
Industry professionals, beer enthusiasts
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
02/02/2026
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual description:
Industry news article detailing the consolidation and rescue of several breweries in the UK, their financial struggles, and future plans under new ownership.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Plant Adaptations
Document Type:
Educational text
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, educators
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Location:
Central Bradford, United Kingdom
Salary Grade:
4 (Lower), Point 29-33
Hours:
29.6 per week (Part-time) / 37 hours per week (Full-time)
Responsible to:
Operational Manager
Type of Service:
Children’s domestic abuse support
Organization:
Family Action
Target Audience:
Children affected by domestic abuse and their families
Qualifications Required:
Degree in Social Work, Education, Health, Youth & Community, Counselling/Therapy, or equivalent experience
Experience Required:
Team leadership, service management, safeguarding, trauma-informed practice
Skills Required:
Communication, organizational, Microsoft Office, electronic case management systems
Key Responsibilities:
Service management, staff supervision, partnership collaboration, budget oversight, quality assurance, safeguarding compliance
Employment Terms:
Flexible working, occasional out-of-hours work, travel required
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Personal experiences, adolescence, romantic feelings
Document Type:
Memoir / Personal narrative
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Young adults and teens
Period Covered:
Early childhood to Grade 10
Educational Institutions Mentioned:
Poco Dots Daycare Centre, Kwayhquitlam Middle School, Riverside Secondary School
Key Events:
First crush, transition crushes, middle school experiences, high school crush
Emotional Focus:
Lessons learned from romantic experiences and self-growth
Narrative Style:
First-person, reflective
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
North Karanpura
Theme:
Price breakdown for construction and engineering services
Document Type:
Contract / Tender
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and service providers in the construction and engineering field
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2007
Region / city:
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales
Subject:
Adoption, Fostering, Health Assessment
Document type:
Health Report
Organization:
Agency responsible for adoption and fostering
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Prospective adoptive parents, foster carers, GP
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2007
Region / city:
British Columbia
Topic:
Dam Safety, Flood Inundation, Consequence Classification
Document Type:
Guideline
Institution:
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Dam safety officers, engineers, dam owners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified