№ files_lp_4_process_1_36836
File format: docx
Character count: 6982
File size: 24 KB
Year:
2009
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Music Education
Document Type:
Persuasive Speech
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of Education, National Music Foundation, Canfield Band Program
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
General public, supporters of education
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2009
Date of Changes:
None
Need/Problem:
Budget cuts and belief that arts are not essential lead to music education program cuts
Solution:
Fundraisers and private donations to support music education
Economic Impact:
Loss of jobs, decreased local revenue without music programs
Educational Impact:
Improvement in academic skills, development of well-rounded students
References:
Fundraiserinsight.org, Education Week, VH1 Save the Music Foundation, National Music Foundation
Context Description:
A persuasive speech encouraging support for music education programs in schools, highlighting the negative impact of cuts and the solutions through fundraising.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2007
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Mathematics, measurement
Document type:
Informative text
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
General public
Period of validity:
Not applicable
Date of approval:
Not applicable
Date of changes:
Not applicable
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Bass Strait, Victoria
Topic:
Carbon Capture and Storage, Environmental Management
Document Type:
Environmental Plan, Project Update
Organization / Institution:
CarbonNet, AGR (Australia) Pty Ltd, NOPSEMA
Author:
CarbonNet Project Team
Target Audience:
Stakeholders, Local Community, Environmental Regulators
Period of Validity:
November 2019 - Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 2019
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
South Atlantic States, USA
Subject:
Education, Scholarships, Eligibility Criteria
Document Type:
Application Instructions
Organization / Institution:
South Atlantic JUBILEE Scholarship Committee
Author:
South Atlantic JUBILEE Scholarship Committee
Target Audience:
Students applying for the South Atlantic JUBILEE College Scholarship
Period of Action:
Application deadline May 29, 2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Context:
A scholarship application document detailing eligibility requirements, essay topics, and submission instructions for the South Atlantic JUBILEE College Scholarship for students in certain states.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Walvis Basin, offshore Namibia
Topic:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Regulatory Document
Organization / Institution:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Author:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Target Audience:
Interested and/or Affected Parties (I&APs)
Period of Action:
2026–2027 (estimated)
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Walvis Basin, Offshore Namibia
Topic:
Environmental Impact Assessment, Offshore Exploration
Document Type:
Environmental Clearance Application
Organization / Institution:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited, Environmental Resources Management (ERM)
Author:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Target Audience:
Interested and/or Affected Parties (I&APs), Environmental Regulators
Period of Validity:
2026-2027
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Cornwall, UK
Theme:
Geothermal Energy, Tendering
Document Type:
Tender Invitation
Issuing Organization:
Eden Geothermal Limited
Author:
Augusta Grand, Executive Director
Target Audience:
Potential suppliers of drilling fluids services
Period of Validity:
Until 11th December 2020
Approval Date:
28th October 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Evaluation Process:
Yes
Confidentiality Clause:
Yes
Legal Considerations:
Applicable UK Law
Language:
English
Cost Considerations:
No reimbursement for expenses
Description:
A tender invitation for drilling fluids services in the Eden Geothermal Project, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Bulgaria
Topic:
Immigration Services
Document Type:
Administrative Service Description
Authority:
Ministry of Interior, Migration Directorate
Target Audience:
Foreign citizens seeking residence documents in Bulgaria
Period of Validity:
Up to 6 months
Legal Basis:
State Fees Act, Tariff No. 4
Period for Issuance:
Up to 14 days
Fee for Service:
BGN 2 or BGN 10 (depending on EU citizenship status)
Issuance Fee:
BGN 5 or BGN 20 (depending on EU citizenship status)
Year:
2025/26
Region / City:
University
Topic:
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Document Type:
University Guidance
Organization / Institution:
University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Application:
2025/26 Academic Session
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Walvis Basin, Namibia
Topic:
Environmental Impact Assessment, Exploration Drilling
Document Type:
Environmental Clearance Application
Organization:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Author:
Chevron Namibia Exploration II Limited
Target Audience:
Interested and/or Affected Parties (I&APs), Environmental Authorities, Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
2026–2027
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
MGP Number:
GP 12.3.2
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Ohio
Theme:
Oil and gas production, Environmental regulations
Document type:
Permit application
Organization / Institution:
Ohio EPA
Author:
Ohio EPA
Target Audience:
Facility operators
Validity period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
December 2024
Region / city:
South West Sheffield
Theme:
Health and Wellbeing, Community Engagement
Document Type:
Grant Application Form
Organ / institution:
Age UK Sheffield
Author:
Adam Howard, Senior Community Engagement Officer
Target Audience:
Local community organizations and groups in South West Sheffield
Period of validity:
Until funds are allocated
Approval Date:
December 2024
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
New South Wales
Subject:
Mathematics
Document Type:
Educational Activity
Institution:
NSW Education Standards Authority
Author:
NSW Education Standards Authority
Target Audience:
Students, Teachers
Period of Activity:
2022
Approval Date:
2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2022
Country:
England and Wales
Topic:
Teen mental health and wellbeing
Document type:
Case for support
Programme name:
Reading Well for teens
Organisations:
The Reading Agency; Libraries Connected; Arts Council England; Welsh Government
Delivery setting:
Public libraries
Target audience:
Young people aged 13–18
Funding bodies:
Arts Council England; Welsh Government
Launch date:
October 2022
Replaced programme:
Reading Well for Young People – Shelf Help (2016)
Number of books:
27
Formats:
Print books and digital resources
Key themes:
Wellbeing; anxiety; depression; body image; neurodiversity; bereavement; life experiences; sexuality; gender identity; mental health
Endorsing bodies:
NHS England; Royal College of Psychiatrists; Royal College of General Practitioners; Mental Health Foundation; Mind; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families; British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Mental Health, Wellbeing, Libraries
Document Type:
Report
Institution:
The Reading Agency, Arts Council England, Welsh Government
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Library authorities, mental health professionals, young people aged 13-18
Period of Application:
October 2022 onwards
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Research paper submission guidelines
Document Type:
Article
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, authors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Cornwall, UK
Subject:
Geothermal energy, tender invitation
Document type:
Invitation to tender
Issuing organization:
Eden Geothermal Limited
Author:
Augusta Grand, Executive Director
Target audience:
Suppliers of vacuum insulated tubing and related equipment
Action period:
From 11th March 2022 to 19th April 2022
Approval date:
11th March 2022
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024