№ lp_1_05181
File format: docx
Character count: 4381
File size: 43 KB
This document is a consultation paper reviewing and proposing amendments to the Animal Products Notice regarding specifications for products intended for animal consumption, aimed at updating regulations and aligning with broader food safety reforms.
Year:
2019
Region / City:
New Zealand
Subject:
Animal products, regulations, specifications
Document Type:
Consultation document
Organization / Institution:
Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI)
Author:
Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI)
Target Audience:
Operators in animal product industries, regulatory bodies
Effective Period:
2019
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
New Zealand
Topic:
Animal product regulations, pet food
Document type:
Regulatory amendment notice
Institution:
Ministry for Primary Industries
Author:
New Zealand Government
Target audience:
Animal product operators, pet food manufacturers
Effective period:
2026 and onwards
Approval date:
2026
Amendment date:
2026
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Christian Doctrine, Biblical Teachings
Document type:
Religious Text
Author:
Paul
Target audience:
Christian believers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Vaccine Policy, Maternal Health, Group B Streptococcus
Document type:
WHO Guidance
Institution:
World Health Organization (WHO)
Author:
WHO ECVP
Target audience:
Policymakers, Vaccine Developers, Public Health Authorities
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
March 11, 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Cross-Laminated Timber Panels
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
Sterling Solutions
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Specifiers, Architects, Engineers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Revision Date:
N/A
Year:
2012
Region / City:
International
Topic:
Veterinary Medicine, Biological Safety
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
World Health Organization (WHO)
Author:
Farsang & Kulcsar
Target Audience:
Veterinary professionals, regulatory bodies, vaccine manufacturers
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Commercial document
Description of commodity:
Animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption
Temperature of products:
Ambient, Chilled, Frozen, Controlled temperature
Means of transport:
Aeroplane, Ship, Railway wagon, Road vehicle, Other
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Flood risk management, community preparedness
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Community officials, emergency managers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Wood doors specification for construction projects
Document Type:
Specification
Organization / Institution:
Simpson Door Company
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Designers and builders
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
European Union
Subject:
Animal by-products, transport
Document type:
Commercial document
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Not specified
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Context description:
This is a commercial document used for the transport of animal by-products within the European Union, complying with Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009.
Type of document:
Technical specification annex
Subject:
Design and manufacture of an oscillation system for a radial collimator
Intended use:
Neutron diffractometer for scanning deformations
Device:
Oscillation system of a radial collimator
Collimator type:
Horizontally and vertically convergent radial collimator
Horizontal angle range:
14.456 degrees
Vertical angle range:
12.27 degrees
Focal length L1:
170 mm
Number of channels:
31
Number of foils:
30
Middle foil length:
350 mm
Resolution at focus:
FWHM = 2 mm at neutron wavelength > 0.1 nm
Full width at half maximum:
2.00 mm × 0.669 degree
Total sample–detector distance:
1,000 mm
Oscillation range requirement:
At least three collimator apertures
Mechanical constraint:
Distance from detector arm to central horizontal detector axis 225 mm
Drive system:
Stepper motor with encoder
Controller compatibility:
Nanotec SMCI 33-2 or SMCI 47-S-2
Design documentation:
To be created by the supplier
Legal reference:
Act No. 134/2016 Coll., § 89, para. 6
Year:
2026
Region / city:
European Union
Topic:
Animal by-products transport
Document type:
Commercial document
Authority/organization:
European Union
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Industry professionals, authorities
Effective period:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Context description:
Commercial document detailing the transport and certification requirements for animal by-products not intended for human consumption under EU regulations.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Doncaster
Topic:
Community Engagement, Environmental Sustainability
Document Type:
Grant Application Form
Organization:
Climate Doncaster
Target Audience:
Community Organizations
Period of Activity:
November 2024 – February 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
New Zealand
Topic:
Animal product regulations, pet food
Document type:
Regulatory amendment notice
Institution:
Ministry for Primary Industries
Author:
New Zealand Government
Target audience:
Animal product operators, pet food manufacturers
Effective period:
2026 and onwards
Approval date:
2026
Amendment date:
2026
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Goa, India
Topic:
Data Collection & Consumption
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Xiaonan Shi, Jean Trakinat
Target Audience:
3GPP members, 6G system developers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
TBD
Date of Modifications:
February 2026
Agenda Item:
x.x
Document for:
Approval
Contact:
Xiaonan Shi ([email protected]
Note:
)
Abstract:
Provides initial Table 14.1.5-3 for consolidation discussions on 6G data collection and consumption mechanisms.
Context:
This document is a technical report for discussion and approval of proposed requirements for data collection and consumption within 6G systems, focusing on privacy, security, and data processing.
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Commercial document
Description of commodity:
Animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption
Temperature of products:
Ambient, Chilled, Frozen, Controlled temperature
Means of transport:
Aeroplane, Ship, Railway wagon, Road vehicle, Other
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
European Union
Subject:
Animal by-products, transport
Document type:
Commercial document
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Not specified
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Context description:
This is a commercial document used for the transport of animal by-products within the European Union, complying with Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009.