№ files_lp_4_process_1_42259
File format: docx
Character count: 1547
File size: 534 KB
Guide explaining how students can log into the Student Portal using a Magic Link, replacing traditional username and password with an easier sign-in method.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Student Portal Login
Document Type:
Instruction Guide
Organization / Institution:
Bromcom
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Effective Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Card game rules
Document Type:
Rules
Organization:
Wizards of the Coast
Author:
Wizards of the Coast
Target Audience:
Magic: The Gathering players, tournament organizers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 16, 2026
Date of Changes:
January 16, 2026
Note:
Contextual Description
A comprehensive set of rules for competitive gameplay in Magic:
The Gathering, including general gameplay mechanics, card types, turn structure, and multiplayer variants.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Competitive Gameplay, Magic: The Gathering
Document Type:
Rulebook
Organization / Institution:
Wizards of the Coast
Author:
Wizards of the Coast
Target Audience:
Magic: The Gathering players, tournament organizers
Effective Date:
November 14, 2025
Date of Last Change:
Not specified
Document Version:
Not specified
The document outlines the official rules and regulations for competitive Magic:
The Gathering gameplay, providing a detailed reference for players and tournament organizers.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Competitive gameplay rules
Document Type:
Rulebook
Organization / Institution:
Wizards of the Coast
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Players of Magic: The Gathering
Effective Period:
From September 19, 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
This is a rulebook for Magic:
The Gathering detailing the comprehensive gameplay mechanics, game phases, card types, and multiplayer variants.
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Game rules
Document Type:
Official rules
Organization:
Wizards of the Coast
Author:
Wizards of the Coast
Target Audience:
Magic: The Gathering players
Effective Date:
February 1, 2014
Date of Last Update:
Ongoing updates
This is an official source document outlining the comprehensive rules for playing Magic:
The Gathering, including gameplay mechanics, card types, and special rules for various formats.
Year:
2010
Region / City:
Bushbuckridge, South Africa
Subject:
Football, Magic, History
Document Type:
Academic Article
Institution:
Brunel University, London
Author:
Isak Niehaus
Target Audience:
Scholars, Football Enthusiasts, Anthropologists
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Author:
Christopher Emdin
Intended Audience:
Teachers, educators, public speakers
Description:
Video featuring a TED talk by Christopher Emdin focused on techniques to engage an audience, with insights on teaching and public speaking.
Year:
2018
Region:
West Africa (origin of Magic Berries)
Subject:
Taste perception, food science
Document type:
Educational script
Institution / Organization:
2018BBB Society
Authors:
Unspecified educators or presenters
Target audience:
Children
Duration of activity:
Approximately 1 hour
Key materials:
Magic berry tablets, lemon juice, small dixie cups, poster
Media reference:
YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Ep1atfFlg
Topics covered:
Taste buds, miraculin protein, sour-to-sweet taste transformation, sensory experiment
Method:
Demonstration with interactive tasting
Year:
2026
Genre:
Fantasy, Science Fiction
Type of Document:
Novel excerpt
Author:
Not specified
Setting:
Earth and Magical Universe
Main Characters:
Sinera Black, Unetz Chort, King Kerrasar
Conflict:
Universal war between humans and magical beings
Key Events:
Battle in a city, sorting of rebels, arrival at Varrosaba fortress
Perspective:
Third-person narrative
Intended Audience:
General readers of fantasy fiction
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States / Canada (locations referenced in texts)
Theme:
Children’s literature, comprehension questions
Document Type:
Quiz compilation / educational reference
Sources:
Astrid the Unstoppable; Upside Down Magic; Linked; Peter Lee’s Notes from the Field; Because of the Rabbit; J.D. and the Great Barber Battle
Authors / Compilers:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Children and young readers
Number of Rounds:
3 plus Tiebreakers
Format:
Multiple choice and true/false questions with answers and page references
Content Period:
Contemporary children’s literature (published works from 2000s–2020s)
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Electronics / Robotics
Document type:
Technical manual
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Electronics students, robotics enthusiasts
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context:
A technical guide to understanding and building a PWM circuit using diodes for controlling motor speed in robotics.
Year group:
KS1
Length of Unit:
6 ½ weeks
Subjects:
Geography, History, Science, Art, Technology, Music, Computing, PE, International Society
Learning Objectives:
Changes in toys over time, material properties, product design, movement and dance exploration
Assessment Opportunities:
Extended writing tasks, presentations, museum display
Entry Points:
Puppet visit, Toymaker’s workshop setup
Prior Learning:
EYFS junk modelling experience
Tasks Included:
History tasks, science experiments, design and technology projects, music and PE activities
Target Audience:
Primary school students
Educational Links:
National Curriculum links in Geography, History, Science, Art, Technology, Computing, PE
Resources Required:
Toys from home, craft materials, painting “The ToyShop” by Peter Blake, Teddy bears
Contextual Description:
Curriculum planning document detailing an integrated primary unit combining history, science, art, technology, music, computing, and PE through the theme of toys, including learning objectives, tasks, and assessment strategies.
Year:
2018
Date:
02 September 2018
Series:
ATOWM Series II
Program number:
39
Subject:
Esoteric philosophy and occult teachings on the astral plane
Source work discussed:
A Treatise on White Magic
Specific section:
Rule X 10.23
Author / Speaker:
Michael D. Robbins
Document type:
Video and audio commentary transcript
Format:
.wmv video file and .mp3 audio file
Video duration:
1:05 hr
Audio duration:
1:05 hr
File size (video):
270 MB
File size (audio):
66 MB
Content form:
Lecture-style esoteric commentary
Key concepts:
astral plane, esoteric anatomy, subtle energy centres, rays, head centres, spiritual initiation
Note:
Year
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Travel, Tourism, Consumer Campaign
Document Type:
Marketing Campaign
Organization / Institution:
Escape Magazine
Author:
[Agent Name]
Target Audience:
Consumers interested in travel
Period of Action:
Spring 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region:
Global
Subject:
Trading Card Game, Magic: The Gathering
Document Type:
Release Notes
Organization:
Wizards of the Coast
Authors:
Matt Tabak, Laurie Cheers, Carsten Haese, Eli Shiffrin, Zoe Stephenson, Thijs van Ommen
Audience:
Players of Magic: The Gathering
Effective Period:
From July 17, 2015
Key Features:
Five Planeswalkers origin stories, double-faced cards mechanics
Event Dates:
Prerelease July 11–12, 2015; Launch Weekend July 17–19, 2015; Game Day August 8–9, 2015
Card Count:
272 core cards, 16 additional reprints
Format Legality:
Standard format legal from official release date
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
Interpreter Services, Sign Language, Government Agencies
Document Type:
Manual, Agreement
Organization:
Virginia Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Target Audience:
Qualified Sign Language Interpreters, State and Local Government Agencies
Effective Date:
January 1, 2020
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2020
Date of Last Update:
January 1, 2020
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Burlington
Subject:
Signage Regulations
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Institution:
Burlington City Government
Target Audience:
Property owners, contractors, and individuals applying for sign permits
Program name:
Ashland Sign & Façade Program
Document type:
Application form
Grant type:
Reimbursement grant
Administering organization:
Town of Ashland
Administering program:
Ashland Economic Development Incentive Program
Location:
Ashland, Massachusetts
Eligible applicants:
Businesses located in Ashland
Eligible improvements:
Exterior façade and sign improvements
Maximum funding amount:
Up to 50% of project cost or $5,000
Funding source:
Town funding
Approval authority:
Ashland Economic Development Advisory Group; Town Manager; Board of Selectmen
Submission requirements:
Completed application, bids, permits, supporting documents
Contact person:
Economic Development Director
Contact address:
101 Main Street, Ashland, MA 01721
Contact email:
[email protected]
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters