№ lp_2_1_28416
File format: docx
Character count: 10353
File size: 41 KB
This proposal outlines a strategy to integrate workforce preparedness skills with academic degree programs at Florida Atlantic University, emphasizing the development of career readiness competencies for graduates.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Florida
Theme:
Career Readiness, Higher Education, Workforce Competencies
Document Type:
Proposal
Organization:
Florida Atlantic University
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
University stakeholders, faculty, employers, students
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / city:
California
Theme:
Education, Regulations
Document type:
Final Statement of Reasons
Institution:
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Target audience:
Educators, School administrators, Policy makers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
April 2021
Amendment dates:
February 2021, July 2021, December 2021
Note:
Context
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Wireless LAN, Privacy, SAE Credentials, Security
Document Type:
Technical Proposal
Organization / Institution:
IEEE
Author:
Dan Harkins (HPE), Michael Montemurro (Huawei), Jouni Malinen (Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.)
Target Audience:
Developers, Engineers, Researchers in Wireless LAN Security
Approval Date:
2025-07-29
Context:
This document outlines proposed changes to IEEE P802.11bi regarding the encryption of SAE password identifiers to enhance privacy and prevent eavesdropping during authentication exchanges between CPE Clients and CPE APs.
Version:
1.0
Year:
2018
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
OAuth 2.0, REST APIs, Client Credentials Grant
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Realogy Franchise Group
Author:
Sami Abdul
Target Audience:
Developers
Period of Effect:
N/A
Approval Date:
06/14/2018
Date of Changes:
07/02/2019
Year:
2021
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Education, Teacher Credentialing
Document Type:
Official Notice
Organization / Institution:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Author:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Target Audience:
Educational policymakers, teachers, and other stakeholders in education
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
July 2021, May 2021, July 2021
Year:
2026
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Education, Teacher Credentials
Document Type:
Legal Code
Organization:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Author:
California Government
Target Audience:
Applicants for teacher credentials, education professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2017-18
Region / City:
Pennsylvania
Topic:
Industry-based Learning Credentials
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization:
Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE)
Author:
Pennsylvania Department of Education
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies, School Administrators, Educators
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2017
Date of Changes:
None
Context:
A guidance document providing detailed instructions on how to identify and report industry-recognized credentials for non-CTE students in Pennsylvania.
Organization:
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Academic Affiliations (OAA)
Department:
Office of Academic Affiliations (14AA)
Document type:
Guidance document
Version:
6.3
Publication date:
March 2025
Jurisdiction:
United States
Sector:
Health care education and training
Subject:
Verification of trainee qualifications and credentials
Applies to:
Health Professions Trainees (HPTs)
Target audience:
Affiliate and VA Program Directors
Related form:
Trainee Qualifications and Credentials Verification Letter (TQCVL)
Legal references:
5 U.S.C. § 9202; 28 U.S.C. § 2679; Federal Tort Claims Act
Policy references:
VA HR Management Letter No. 5-19-06 (June 19, 2019)
Training setting:
VA medical facilities
Scope:
Clinical, research, and quality improvement training programs
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Montreal, Canada
Topic:
Credentials, International Conferences
Document Type:
Report
Organ / Institution:
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Author:
Executive Secretary
Target Audience:
Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Parties to the Cartagena Protocol, Parties to the Nagoya Protocol
Effective Period:
7-19 December 2022
Approval Date:
18 December 2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Contextual Description:
A report detailing the credentials submitted by representatives of parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Cartagena Protocol, and Nagoya Protocol during the meetings in December 2022.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Dietetics, Professional Registration
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
New Brunswick Association of Dietitians (NBAD)
Author:
New Brunswick Association of Dietitians
Target Audience:
Internationally trained dietitians seeking registration in New Brunswick
Year:
2026
Region / City:
West Virginia
Theme:
Legislation
Document Type:
Bill
Agency / Institution:
West Virginia Legislature
Author:
Delegates Vance, Martin, Mallow, Brooks
Target Audience:
Legislators, Education Officials, Coaches
Period of Action:
2026
Approval Date:
January 29, 2026
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Illinois, USA
Document Type:
Credentialing Form
Target Group:
Emergency Department Physicians, Mid-Level Providers, Nursing Staff
Certifications Required:
Board Certification, APLS, PALS, ENPC
Data Included:
Full-time/Part-time status, Date of ED Hire, License Verification, CME/CEU Hours
Applicable Regulations:
EMS Administrative Code 515.4000
Verification Authority:
Hospital CEO/Administrator
Submission Requirement:
Copies of certifications and CME/CEU records
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Surrey Heartlands
Topic:
Medical Prescribing, Shared Care
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board (ICB)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Private healthcare providers, NHS prescribers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Criminal Records, Employment, Stigma, Positive Credentials
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
Northeastern University, University of North Carolina—Charlotte
Author:
Megan Denver, Samuel E. DeWitt
Target Audience:
Academics, policymakers, employers
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Pending
Modification Date:
Pending
Note:
Description
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Subject:
Welding Certifications
Document Type:
Certification List
Issuing Organization:
American Welding Society
Target Audience:
Welders, Welding Inspectors, Educators
Validity Period:
April 2025
Approval Date:
April 2025
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Switzerland
Topic:
Clinical research, human research projects
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Author:
Education Platform of the Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Target Audience:
Clinical research professionals, project leaders, and researchers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Update:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Education, Healthcare
Document Type:
Guideline
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Healthcare educators, trainers, facilitators
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
MDS 2023 Updates, Training Plan Design
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Author:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Target Audience:
Healthcare facilities, staff involved in resident care
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Competency assessment, audit, Corporations Act
Document type:
Logbook, guidance
Target audience:
Applicants for RCA registration, assessors
Period of validity:
3–5 years