№ lp_1_2_63212
File format: docx
Character count: 43660
File size: 92 KB
Year:
2009
Region / City:
Tower Hamlets
Subject:
Academic language development for EAL pupils
Document type:
Guide
Institution:
Tower Hamlets EMA team
Author:
Tower Hamlets EMA team
Target audience:
Teachers and practitioners in Tower Hamlets
Period of applicability:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Context:
The document provides guidance on how to support the academic language development of EAL students in Tower Hamlets by offering strategies for teaching language structures and functions.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Statistical Capacity Building, Data Development
Document Type:
Report
Author:
World Bank
Target Audience:
Policymakers, Statistical Institutions, Development Partners
Period of Validity:
2021 and beyond
Approval Date:
2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
NSF Program Proposals
Document Type:
Guide
Author:
National Science Foundation
Target Audience:
Principal Investigators, Researchers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Caribbean
Theme:
Human Rights, Regional Jurisprudence
Document Type:
Official Response
Institution:
Caribbean Court of Justice
Author:
Caribbean Court of Justice
Target Audience:
Governments, International Human Rights Bodies
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Revisions:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Nakhon Ratchasima
Theme:
Human Research Ethics
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Suranaree University of Technology
Author:
Human Research Ethics Committee, Suranaree University of Technology
Target Audience:
Researchers, faculty members, graduate students
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Region / city:
San Francisco
Topic:
Career Technical Education (CTE), Workforce Development
Document Type:
Planning and Implementation Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
City College of San Francisco
Author:
Kathy White, Steven Brown, Olga Shvarts
Target Audience:
CTE department members, faculty, staff, administrators
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Description:
A set of recommendations for improving the structure and implementation of Career Technical Education (CTE) programs at City College of San Francisco, focusing on resource allocation, faculty development, program review, and industry partnerships.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Commercialization, SBIR, STTR, Business Development
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Author:
NIH Office of Extramural Research
Target Audience:
Small business applicants for SBIR/STTR programs, Entrepreneurs
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / city:
N/A
Theme:
Liturgical Music
Document Type:
Music Suggestions
Organ / Institution:
Catholic Book of Worship III, Glory & Praise, Spirit & Song, Celebrate in Song
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Religious Congregations, Liturgists
Period of Action:
February 1 to March 1, 2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
USA
Subject:
Mathematics, Education
Document Type:
Template
Institution:
LaGuardia Community College, Hostos Community College
Author:
Małgorzata Marciniak, Bronisław Czarnocha
Target Audience:
Researchers, Educators
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Telecommunications, ICT, Digital Transformation
Document Type:
Contribution
Organization / Institution:
Informal Expert Group on WTPF-26
Author:
Government of India
Target Audience:
Informal Expert Group members
Period of Validity:
Until WTPF-26 in 2026
Approval Date:
7 August 2025
Revision Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Resourcefulness development, professional skills
Document type:
Article
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Students in teacher education, professionals
Period of applicability:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Book List
Target Audience:
Children, Educators
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Karnataka
Topic:
Real Estate Development
Document Type:
Agreement for Sale
Organization / Institution:
Government of Karnataka
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Promoters, Allottees, Real Estate Developers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
07-01-2020
Date of Amendments:
15-09-2015
Context:
Legal document detailing terms and conditions for real estate development agreements under RERA provisions in Karnataka.
. Please see https:
//www.hrsa.gov/about/508-resources
Note:
for the HRSA digital accessibility statement.
Year:
202X
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Virtual Engagement Strategies for Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs
Document Type:
Research Protocol
Agency:
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Author:
The Policy & Research Group (PRG)
Target Audience:
Research Analysts, Focus Group Participants, Early Childhood Home Visiting Program Staff
Effective Date:
XX/XX/202X
Date Approved:
XX/XX/202X
Date of Last Update:
XX/XX/202X
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Statistics / Education
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization / Institution:
Home or School Assignment
Author:
Mr. Sullivan
Target Audience:
Students completing a home library statistics portfolio
Required Materials:
PDF worksheet, graphing tools or website
Tasks Included:
Data collection, calculations of mean, median, mode, range, IQR, MAD, and creation of graphs
Submission Format:
Completed PDF worksheet and two graphs (misleading and non-misleading)
Instructions Source:
Lesson materials provided in class
Additional Resources:
NCES Create-A-Graph website
Year:
2019
Date:
May 2019
Submitting Organization:
Center for Military Human Rights Korea
Address:
04057 4th Floor (Taein Bldg.), 20, Shinchon-ro 14-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Email:
[email protected]
Telephone:
+82-2-7337-11913
Country:
Republic of Korea
Region / City:
Seoul
Type of Document:
NGO submission to a United Nations treaty body
Recipient Body:
UN Human Rights Committee
Session:
126th Session
Subject:
Military human rights issues in the Republic of Korea
Relevant Legal Framework:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Referenced Domestic Law:
National Security Act; Military Criminal Act (art. 92-6)
Themes:
Discrimination against sexual minorities; suicide and maltreatment; sexual, verbal and physical violence in the military; conscientious objection; independence of military judiciary; arbitrary detention; right to life; prohibition of slavery; invasion of privacy
Related Institutions:
Ministry of National Defense; National Human Rights Commission of Korea
Period Covered:
Implementation of the Human Rights Committee’s Fourth Concluding Observations and subsequent developments
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Malawi
Subject:
Education, Infrastructure Development, Environmental and Social Management
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Government of the Republic of Malawi, Ministry of Education
Author:
Government of Malawi
Target Audience:
Government officials, education sector stakeholders, contractors
Implementation Period:
December 2021 – December 2025
Approval Date:
February 2024
Revision Date:
February 2024
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Johns Hopkins University
Topic:
Coronavirus, Medical Research, Virus Characteristics
Document type:
Informational Article
Organization / institution:
Johns Hopkins University
Author:
Irene Ken
Target audience:
General Public, Researchers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Date of approval:
4/3/2020
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Beijing, China
Topic:
Neutronics, Fusion Energy, Tritium Breeding Ratio
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
CAEP Software Center for High Performance Numerical Simulation, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics
Authors:
Xin Wang, Rui Li, Yuanguang Fu, Guiming Qin, Li Deng, Xueming Shi
Target Audience:
Researchers and Engineers in Fusion Energy
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Acknowledgement:
Sponsored by National MCF Energy R&D Program (No. 2022YFE03160001)
Note:
References
Li Deng, Gang Li, Bao-Yin Zhang, et al., A High Fidelity General Purpose 3-D Monte Carlo Particle Transport Program JMCT 3.0, Nuclear Science and Techniques, 33:
108 (2022)
Wang, X., Li, JL., Wu, Z. et al., CMGC:
A CAD to Monte Carlo Geometry Conversion Code, NUCL SCI TECH 31, 82 (2020)