№ files_lp_4_process_2_69559
File format: docx
Character count: 1109
File size: 18 KB
Supplementary scientific table listing demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables evaluated and retained in IMRS and GWTG-HF heart failure risk prediction models.
Document section:
Supplemental table
Field:
Cardiology
Topic:
Clinical risk score variables in heart failure models
Scores analyzed:
IMRS; GWTG-HF
Variables assessed:
Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, vital signs, laboratory measurements, and cardiac function indicators
Key demographic variables:
Age; Sex; Race
Vital signs variables:
Systolic blood pressure; Diastolic blood pressure; Heart rate; Respiratory rate; Oxygen saturation
Laboratory variables:
WBC count; Hemoglobin; Hematocrit; Platelet count; MPV; RDW; MCV; MCH; MCHC; Sodium; BUN; Creatinine; Potassium; Chloride; Bicarbonate; Calcium; Glucose; hsCRP; HDL-C; LDL-C
Clinical indicators:
BMI; Smoking status; LVEF
Statistical note:
Hazard ratios normalized for standard deviation
Scope of analysis:
Comparison of variables considered and retained in IMRS and GWTG-HF predictive models
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Patient consent, publication, medical materials
Document Type:
Consent Form
Organization:
British Association of Dermatologists
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Health professionals, researchers, clinicians
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
April 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Context:
Consent form for patients or their representatives to allow the British Association of Dermatologists to use medical materials in publications, ensuring anonymity and outlining the terms of usage.
Note:
Year
Theme:
Surgical Safety, Perioperative Practices
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
[Insert name of facility]
Target Audience:
Perioperative Team
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Ontario
Theme:
Civil Engineering, Construction
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization:
Ontario Ministry of Transportation
Author:
Ontario Ministry of Transportation
Target Audience:
Contractors, Engineers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
September 9, 2022
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
MMUH
Topic:
Records Management, Document Storage
Document Type:
Guidance
Organ / Institution:
NHS
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
NHS staff
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Pension claims
Document Type:
Letter
Organization / Institution:
Fire Brigades Union
Author:
Mark Rowe
Target Audience:
Retained Duty System firefighters and claimants
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
September 2022
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Humberside
Subject:
Firefighter Training and Staffing
Document Type:
Freedom of Information Request
Organization:
Humberside Fire and Rescue Service
Author:
Humberside Fire and Rescue Service
Target Audience:
Public, relevant authorities
Effective Period:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Wicklow Town, County Wicklow, Ireland
Type of Document:
Job Application Form
Organization:
Wicklow County Council
Position:
Part-Time Retained Firefighter
Recruitment Phase:
Rolling Recruitment Phase 2
Application Deadline:
5 March 2026, 12 Noon
Submission Method:
Hardcopy and email
Target Audience:
Candidates residing near Dunlavin fire station
Required Documents:
Completed application form, no CVs
Assessment Criteria:
Relevant Experience, Teamwork, Communication/Interpersonal Skills, Availability & Adaptability
Additional Requirements:
Garda Vetting, evidence of qualifications, proximity to fire station
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Mayo, Ireland
Document Type:
Application Form
Position:
Retained Firefighter
Issuing Organization:
Mayo County Council
Application Deadline:
26 February 2026, 4:00 p.m.
Employment Type:
Part-time
Eligibility:
Residency within 3 km or 4.5-minute travel time of Fire Station
Required Qualifications:
Education, professional or technical certifications, driving licence
Submission Method:
Email to [email protected]
Target Audience:
Prospective part-time firefighters in Mayo
Year:
1980
Region / City:
Georgia
Topic:
International Child Abduction
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Organization:
Hague Convention
Author:
-
Target Audience:
Individuals or institutions involved in child custody matters
Period of Validity:
-
Approval Date:
-
Date of Amendments:
-
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Waterford City & County
Theme:
Firefighter recruitment
Document Type:
Recruitment Information
Agency / Organization:
Waterford City & County Council
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Individuals interested in becoming Retained Firefighters
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not provided
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Research ethics, manuscript submission
Document type:
Template
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Authors submitting research articles
Period of validity:
Not provided
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / city:
International
Topic:
Safety transport of radioactive materials
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Author:
IAEA Secretariat
Target audience:
IAEA members, safety committees, regulators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Australia
Topic:
Oncology, Pharmaceuticals
Document Type:
Resubmission
Institution:
Australian Government, Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee
Author:
AstraZeneca Pty Ltd.
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
November 2021
Date of Changes:
November 2021
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Design Law Treaty
Document Type:
Draft
Organ / Institution:
WIPO
Author:
Secretariat
Target Audience:
Diplomatic Conference Participants, WIPO Member States
Period of Effectiveness:
2023-2024
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Geneva
Topic:
Electric Vehicles, Battery Durability, Heavy Duty Vehicles
Document Type:
Informal Document
Organization / Institution:
United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe
Author:
Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE)
Target Audience:
Governments, regulators, and manufacturers involved in vehicle regulations
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
13 January 2025
Year:
2021
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Youth Protection and Care Services
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
Youth Protection and Intervention Centre (YPIC)
Target Audience:
Social Workers, Case Managers, Youth Support Services
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Malaysia
Theme:
Public Health, Law Enforcement
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication
Authors:
Ezarina Zakaria, Fauziah Ibrahim, Norulhuda Sarnon, Nazirah Hassan
Target Audience:
Policy Makers, Law Enforcement Agencies, Public Health Professionals
Period of Implementation:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / city:
Wendelsheim, Germany
Topic:
Celiac disease, food additives, microbial transglutaminase
Document type:
Letter to the editor
Organization / institution:
AESKU.KIPP Institute
Authors:
Aaron Lerner, Torsten Matthias
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
October 15, 2019
Modification date:
October 9, 2019