№ lp_2_3_24004
File format: docx
Character count: 6302
File size: 57 KB
This document is an application form for hospitals seeking certification under the WHO Patient Safety Friendly Hospital Standards (PSFHS).
Year:
2021
Region / city:
N/A
Subject:
Hospital Accreditation
Document type:
Application Form
Institution:
Quality and Accreditation Institute (QAI), Centre for Accreditation of Health & Social Care (CAHSC)
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Hospitals applying for accreditation
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
March 2021
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025–2026
Theme:
Baby Friendly Initiative standards and re-assessment
Document type:
Guidance notes
Programme:
UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative
Assessment type:
Community re-assessment
Applicable period:
June 2025 – May 2026
Related standards:
Revised Baby Friendly standards
Assessment methods:
Interviews, document review, observations, internal audit validation
Target services:
Baby Friendly accredited community services
Audit tools referenced:
2019 audit tools; 2024 audit tool
Issuing body:
UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative
Requirements status:
Required and recommended evidence specified
Transition phase:
Transition to revised standards
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Local Pilot Communities
Theme:
Dementia Awareness, Community Engagement
Document Type:
Work Plan
Organization / Institution:
Dementia Friendly Communities Project
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Community members, caregivers, employers, and general public
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2023-2025
Region / City:
Lambeth
Thematic Area:
Child rights, community engagement, youth services
Document Type:
Action Plan
Organization:
Lambeth Borough Council
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Local government officials, youth services, community organizations, elected representatives
Period of Validity:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Subject:
Baby Friendly Initiative, Maternity Care
Document Type:
Audit Form
Organisation:
Baby Friendly Initiative
Target Audience:
Maternity facilities, health professionals
Period of validity:
Annual
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
Subject:
Solid Waste Management
Document Type:
Tender / Bidding Document
Organization / Institution:
Board of Management Sundar Industrial Estate (BOM-SIE)
Author:
Environment Officer, BOM-SIE
Target Audience:
EPA approved waste management companies and consortiums
Contract Duration:
Minimum one year, extendable by mutual consent
Project Cost:
Approx. Rs. 8,400,000 per annum
Scope:
Door to door collection, transportation, and environmentally friendly disposal of industrial solid waste
Waste Composition:
Paper, plastic, cloth, organic and kitchen waste
Number of Units Covered:
140–150 industrial units daily
Submission Deadline:
14-07-2016 11:00 AM
Bid Opening:
14-07-2016 11:30 AM
Safety Requirements:
PPE including safety shoes, face mask, leather gloves, goggles
Child Labor:
Strictly prohibited
Number of Bins:
450 solid waste bins at 150 points with color coding (Red = Organic, Blue = Paper, Yellow = Plastic + Metals)
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Thurrock, Essex, UK
Type of document:
Community support schedule
Target audience:
People living with dementia and their carers
Locations:
Grays, Chadwell St Mary, Chafford Hundred, Stanford-le-Hope, Tilbury, South Ockendon, Stifford Clays, Bulphan, Orsett, Laindon, Benfleet, Basildon
Activities:
Support groups, coffee mornings, exercise classes, creative activities, lunch clubs, day centres
Cost:
Free or nominal fee for some activities
Contact information:
Multiple emails and phone numbers listed per group
Service period:
Weekly, biweekly, monthly events, specific dates listed
Year:
2021
Organization:
Dubai Healthcare City Authority
Program:
Excellence Awards 2021
Award Category:
People of Determination – Friendly Entity Award
Document Type:
Award Entry Form
Submission Deadline:
May 20, 2021
Interview Period:
1–10 June 2021
Submission Method:
Email submission with required attachments
Maximum Main Document Length:
25 pages including evidence
Maximum Supporting Documents Length:
10 pages including recent CV
Maximum File Size:
40 MB
Target Applicants:
Organizations within DHCC
Required Information:
Applicant details, organizational profile, achievements, accessibility initiatives, community impact, results and outcomes
Consent Requirement:
Agreement to Terms and Conditions and consent for marketing use of submitted materials
Note:
Year
Context description:
Application form for organizations applying for the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly accreditation, including detailed sections for different health services.
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Technology, Hardware
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Professionals in IT, Security Systems
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
2016.07
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / State:
Washington State
Country:
United States
Program Name:
Breastfeeding Friendly Washington
Managing Authority:
Washington State Department of Health
Program Type:
Voluntary recognition program
Subject:
Breastfeeding support practices in free standing birth centers
Recognition Levels:
Bronze, Silver, Gold
Standards Basis:
Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (World Health Organization)
Related Initiative:
Baby-Friendly® Hospital Initiative
Application Requirements:
Written breastfeeding policy, staff training records, in-service and orientation documentation, Electronic Medical Records, supporting protocols
Submission Contact:
[email protected]
Mailing Address:
PO Box 47830, Olympia, WA 98504-7886
Target Institutions:
Free standing birth centers in Washington State
Evaluation Timeline:
Acknowledgment within one week; review within one month; recognition package within two months if approved
Data Requested:
Total annual births; staffing details for licensed midwives and certified nurse midwives; facility contact and social media information
Authorization Requirement:
Signature confirming accuracy of submitted information
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Bristol
Theme:
Urban Planning, Age-Friendly Cities
Document Type:
Working Paper
Organization / Institution:
Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol
Authors:
Keri Facer, Lindsey Horner, Helen Manchester
Target Audience:
Urban planners, policymakers, researchers, community groups, and the general public
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
The document discusses the concept of an "All-Age Friendly City," focusing on intergenerational design and its importance for both children and older adults.
Document Type:
Checklist Form
Subject:
Return to Play Protocol Compliance
Related Protocol:
FAW Return to Play Protocol
Applicable To:
Adult Friendly Matches
Issuing Body:
Football Association of Wales (FAW)
Health Focus:
Covid-19
Requirements:
Covid-19 Compliance Officer Appointment
Note:
Requirements
Covid-19 Risk Assessment
Data Protection Reference:
GDPR
Retention Period:
28 Days (Participant Data)
Form Fields:
Proposed Fixture Details, Club Confirmation Responses, Signatory Details
Completion By:
Home or Away Club Representative
Year:
2021
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Health & Safety, COVID-19 Protocols
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Home and away team COVID-19 compliance officers, coaches, players, first aiders
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year
Topic:
Environmental Responsibility
Document Type:
Statement
Target Audience:
Guests
Context Description:
A statement by the owners of an accommodation regarding their environmental practices and commitment to sustainability, inviting guests to participate in eco-friendly actions during their stay.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Manchester
Theme:
Security services, Licensing
Document type:
Consultation questionnaire
Organ / Institution:
Home Office
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Security professionals, Employers, Public bodies
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
HIV treatment, healthcare program
Document type:
Official publication
Organization / Institution:
Victorian Government, Department of Health
Author:
Victorian Government
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, HIV patients, healthcare policy makers
Date of approval:
August 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified
Reference no:
HPV (GBMSM) PGD
Version no:
v5.0
Valid from:
1 September 2025
Review date:
1 April 2028
Expiry date:
1 September 2028
Author:
Suki Hunjunt, Sharif Ismail, David Green
Region / city:
England
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners administering HPV vaccine to GBMSM
Type of document:
Patient Group Direction
Organisation:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Date of approval:
17 July 2025
Date of modifications:
16 July 2025
Context:
A formal Patient Group Direction for the administration of HPV vaccine to GBMSM, detailing legal, clinical, and procedural requirements for healthcare practitioners in England.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Vaccine Policy, Maternal Health, Group B Streptococcus
Document type:
WHO Guidance
Institution:
World Health Organization (WHO)
Author:
WHO ECVP
Target audience:
Policymakers, Vaccine Developers, Public Health Authorities
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
March 11, 2025
Date of changes:
Not specified