№ files_lp_4_process_2_65318
File format: docx
Character count: 19039
File size: 2622 KB
Guide for assembling a herbal first aid kit using all-natural remedies to treat common ailments, including burns, muscle aches, and insect bites.
Note:
Year
Theme:
Herbal Medicine, First Aid, Natural Remedies
Document Type:
Guide, Educational Material
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
New Delhi
Topic:
Herbal Medicine, Ophthalmology
Document Type:
Medical Examination Notes
Organization / Institution:
AIIMS, Singapore National Eye Center
Author:
Dr Sourabh Sharma
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, students, and healthcare workers
Period of Validity:
September 2017
Date of Approval:
September 2017
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Bath
Topic:
Herbal Medicine History
Document Type:
Announcement
Organization / Institution:
Herbal History Research Network (HHRN)
Author:
Herbal History Research Network
Target Audience:
Students and recently qualified herbal practitioners in the UK
Period of Validity:
28 August 2019 - 9 September 2019
Approval Date:
28 August 2019
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Cosmetics, Herbal Skincare
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Sumaira Nasreen, Tahir Md, Abuzar Husain, Jaleel Md, Daniyal Aaqeib Ateeque Ah
Target Audience:
Researchers, Cosmetic Industry Professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Title:
Standardized Herbal Extracts Product Catalogue
Document Type:
Product Catalogue
Industry:
Herbal Extracts and Nutraceutical Ingredients
Content Type:
Technical Product List
Product Range:
MN-101 to MN-173
Information Fields:
Product Code, Name, Specifications, Botanical Name, Suggested Use
Intended Audience:
Manufacturers and Buyers of Herbal and Nutraceutical Ingredients
Subject Matter:
Standardized plant extracts with defined active constituents and suggested applications
Format:
Tabulated Technical Listing
Journal:
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Manuscript Type:
Editorial
Authors:
Chang Qiao; Hao-Xiang Zhang; Xiao-Tong Tian; Yan-Jing Zhang; De-Hui Li
Co-first authors:
Chang Qiao; Hao-Xiang Zhang
Corresponding authors:
Yan-Jing Zhang; De-Hui Li
Affiliated Institutions:
Hebei University of Chinese Medicine; Guang’anmen Hospital, Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences; The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine
Country:
China
Region / City:
Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province; Beijing
Research Field:
Gastrointestinal Oncology; Integrative Medicine; Multi-omics Research
Keywords:
Chinese herbal compounds; Gastrointestinal microenvironment; Chemotherapy; Multi-omics; Intestinal microecology
Funding:
Government-funded Project of the Outstanding Talents Training Program in Clinical Medicine (ZF2023165); Key Research and Development Projects of Hebei Province (18277731D); Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (H202423105)
Received:
September 16, 2024
Revised:
November 11, 2024
Accepted:
November 25, 2024
Published online:
February 15, 2025
DOI:
10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.101500
Article URL:
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i2/101500.htm
Subject Focus:
Mechanisms of Chinese herbal compounds in mitigating chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal injury through multi-omics approaches
Institutions Involved:
Graduate School of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine; Department of Oncology I and II, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine; Guang’anmen Hospital, Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Herbal Supplements
Document Type:
Educational Case Study
Institution:
Nursing Education Program
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Nursing students or healthcare learners
Objectives:
Examine herbal and botanical supplement use, plan medication administration, integrate with nursing process
Activity Type:
Interactive Case Study
Content Focus:
Client assessment, supplement indications and contraindications, patient education
Year:
2026
Field:
Molecular biology / Pharmacology
Focus:
Cancer-related mRNA pathways
Type of document:
Research summary
Methodology:
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis
Organism:
Human
Target condition:
Breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC)
Data points:
4 pathways significantly enriched
Statistical significance:
p-values ranging from 7.9E-3 to 7.3E-2
End goal:
Understanding molecular response to herbal treatment
Research context:
Co-expression analysis of mRNAs in BC and PC
Year:
2013
Region / city:
Utrecht, Netherlands
Subject:
Herbal medicine
Document type:
BA Thesis
Institution:
Utrecht University
Author:
Githa Backx-de Groot
Target audience:
Students, researchers in historical medicine and linguistics
Period of validity:
Ancient to modern times
Date of approval:
June 2013
Date of revisions:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
Topic:
Herbal cocktails, reproductive hormones, fertility enhancement, toxicity
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
University of Port Harcourt
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, regulatory authorities
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Antonio, Texas
Theme:
Retinoblastoma, Fundraising, Medical Conferences
Document Type:
Crowdfunding Page Template
Organization:
WE C Hope USA
Author:
Marissa Gonzalez, Abby White
Target Audience:
Parents, Survivors, Medical Professionals, Supporters
Period of Action:
September 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Subject area:
Clinical research compliance
Topic:
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
Applicable field:
Clinical trials
Responsible parties:
Sponsor, monitor, site personnel, principal investigator
Regulatory body referenced:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Key components:
Root cause analysis, corrective action, preventive action, follow-up evaluation
Authorship requirements:
Responsible individual or organization
Approval requirements:
Author signature, IRB review
Record retention:
Site regulatory file
Intended use:
Documentation of discrepancies and corrective measures in clinical research
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Middlesex University
Topic:
Research Ethics, Online Survey Tools
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
Middlesex University
Author:
Middlesex University
Target Audience:
Staff and Students
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2024
Date of Revisions:
August 2024
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Business Software / Presentation Software
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Glenda Liddell-White
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
April 14 – 18, 2025
Contextual Description:
A lesson plan for teaching students how to create and manage professional presentations using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Engineering Awards
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Author:
Jane Moran Alspach
Target Audience:
Members of the American Society of Civil Engineers, potential nominators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
-
Theme:
Production Resources/Tools Master Data Creation
Document Type:
Master Data Script
Organization / Institution:
SAP
Author:
-
Target Audience:
SAP system users, Production Engineers, Data Specialists, Maintenance Planners
Validity Period:
-
Approval Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Michigan
Topic:
Bleach Dilution for Disinfection
Document Type:
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
Institution:
Michigan State University, Center for Research on Ingredient Safety
Author:
Anderson, E., and J. Li
Target Audience:
Laboratory Personnel
Effective Date:
5-14-2020
Revision Date:
5-14-2020
Note:
Year
Topic:
Onboarding, Personal Development, Workplace Integration
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
New employees, managers, HR professionals
Year:
2016
Region / City:
San Francisco, CA
Subject:
Construction, demolition, renovation, and installation at VA San Francisco Health Care System
Document Type:
Bid Request
Organ / Institution:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Network Contracting Office 21
Author:
Karen Smith, Contracting Officer
Target Audience:
Contractors holding MATOC contracts with VISN 21
Period of Action:
September 9, 2016
Approval Date:
September 7, 2016