№ lp_1_2_46238
File format: docx
Character count: 6508
File size: 104 KB
The document provides a detailed engineering specification for Tri-Flex Loop®, a flexible piping solution designed to absorb and compensate for multi-plane movements in piping systems.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
USA
Topic:
Engineering Specifications
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Author:
Flex Hose Co.
Target Audience:
Engineers, Installers, Industry Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not provided
Amendment Date:
Not provided
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
1998
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Integration of theory and practice in social work
Document Type:
Academic model
Author:
Bogo & Vayda
Target Audience:
Social work students, professionals in the field
Period of Action:
Ongoing application
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Quarter:
2Q14
Year:
2014
Industry:
Telecommunications
Domain:
Loop qualification and broadband services
Document type:
Technical field specification
Message types:
Loop Qualification Query (LQQ), Loop Qualification Response (LQR)
Scope:
Administrative, address-based query, circuit information, and response data
Intended use:
Trading partner data exchange
Data elements:
Field names, requirements, lengths, characteristics, valid values
Standards reference:
Internal message format definitions
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM)
Version:
6
Issuing organisation:
Frimley Integrated Care System
Region:
Frimley ICS
Country:
United Kingdom
Document status:
Controlled document
Review date:
August 2025
Key topics:
Hybrid Closed Loop systems, insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring
Clinical area:
Paediatric type 1 diabetes
Target population:
Children and young people with type 1 diabetes
Relevant guidance:
NICE Technology Appraisal TA943
Care setting:
Specialist Diabetes Service
Multidisciplinary team involvement:
Yes
Implementation scope:
NHS England services
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Medora, North Dakota
Project Location:
I-94 Business Loop / Pacific Avenue, Little Missouri River Bridge to 6th Street
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Issuing Agency:
North Dakota Department of Transportation
Project Number:
5-094(152)900
PCN:
23114
Scope of Work:
Preliminary engineering, environmental studies, roadway and bridge design, permitting, right of way acquisition, and construction plans
Structure Affected:
Little Missouri River Bridge (Structure No. 0094-901.376)
Contract Type:
Cost plus fixed fee
Proposal Submission Deadline:
December 23, 2022, 12:00 PM Central Time
Public and Stakeholder Outreach:
Required throughout the project
Design Approach:
Complete Streets
Planned Construction Milestones:
Substantial completion by Fall 2025; full completion by July 4, 2026
Project Phases:
Phase I Scoping; Phase II and subsequent authorized phases
Author / Signatory:
Ronald J. Henke, PE, Director
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Singapore
Theme:
Environmental Remediation
Document Type:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Organ / Institution:
National Environment Agency (NEA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, applicants for R&D funding
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
UK
Topic:
Addiction, Behavioral Health, Public Health Systems
Document Type:
Academic Assignment
Organization:
UK-based health research organization
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2012-2013
Region / City:
South Loop
Theme:
Education, Mathematics
Document Type:
Curriculum / Syllabus
Author:
Mr. Wold
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Action:
2012-2013 Academic Year
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Class Supplies:
Folder, Notebook, TI-83 or TI-84 Plus Calculator, Ruler, Pencils
Grading Policy:
Daily Assessments, Major Assessments, Homework, Classwork
Homework Policy:
Due next day, late work half credit, absence makeup policy
Behavior Expectations:
Respect, responsibility, and adherence to South Loop Way
Classroom Norms:
Raise hand to speak, respect others, and maintain a productive environment
Course Topics:
Algebra 1
Class Procedures:
Enter quietly, work on PDN, wait for dismissal
Assessment Policy:
Graded on 5-point scale for minor assessments, 100-point scale for major assessments
Year:
2021
Region / City:
China
Subject:
Protective clothing, Medical device
Document Type:
Technical specification
Organization / Institution:
VWR
Author:
VWR
Target Audience:
Professionals in cleanroom production or research
Period of Validity:
5 years
Date of Approval:
Dec 2021
Date of Modification:
N/A
Publication Date:
19 Mar 2020
Closing Date and Time:
25 June 2020, 11.00 am
Proposal Submission:
Integrated Grants Management System (IGMS) at https://researchgrant.gov.sg
Research Area:
LANDFILL AVOIDANCE AND VALUE RECOVERY FROM NON-INCINERABLE WASTE
Author:
National Environment Agency (NEA)
Target Audience:
Researchers and industry collaborators
Scope of the Document:
Research and development proposals for landfill avoidance and value recovery from non-incinerable waste in Singapore
End Date of the Proposal:
25 June 2020
Technology Readiness Level (TRL):
Minimum TRL 5 required
Key Focus Areas:
Freshwater Sludge, Sewage Sludge, and Industrial Waste Streams
Goal:
Diversion of non-incinerable waste from Semakau Landfill for beneficial applications
Year:
2013
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Rubber motor construction for model airplanes
Document type:
Instructional guide
Organization / Institution:
None specified
Author:
Tony Hebb
Target audience:
Model airplane enthusiasts, especially those interested in indoor rubber-powered models
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
January 2013
Revision date:
None specified
Note:
Context
Year:
2024
Organization:
North Loop Neighborhood Association
Location:
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Neighborhood:
North Loop
Type of Document:
Board Candidate Statements
Election Body:
NLNA Board of Directors
Candidates:
Charlie Carlson; John Dinusson; Jonathon Michael Duffy; Kristi Hamilton; Jason Hines; Isaac Kuehn; Diane Merrifield; Andrew Morse
Candidate Status:
Residents (Renters and Owners)
Topics:
Safety and Livability; Planning and Zoning; Business Engagement; Civic Engagement; Governance; Finance; Strategic Direction; Communications
Addresses:
Multiple residential addresses in Minneapolis, MN 55401
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Victoria, Melbourne
Theme:
Public transportation, Infrastructure
Document Type:
Annual Report
Organization:
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Author:
Victorian Government
Target Audience:
General public, policymakers, stakeholders in infrastructure and public transportation
Period of Validity:
2022-2023
Approval Date:
October 2023
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Subject:
Operational Amplifiers
Document type:
Technical article
Target audience:
Engineers, students of electronics
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
and the site visit team chair eight (8) weeks prior to the site visit)(4.2024)
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Accreditation
Document Type:
Schedule Template
Organization / Institution:
ARC-PA
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Program administrators, Site visit team
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Organizations:
Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), East Bay Community Energy (EBCE)
Document Type:
Code Amendment Recommendations
Scope:
Residential and Nonresidential EV Charging Requirements
Version Dates:
May 11, 2022; July 8, 2022; September 2022; October 2022
Target Audience:
Local jurisdictions and code administrators
Reference:
2022 Title 24 Part 11 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
Topics:
EV Charging Stations, EV Ready Spaces, Direct Current Fast Charging, Automatic Load Management Systems, Multifamily and Nonresidential Buildings
URL:
BayAreaReachCodes.Org
Year:
2022
Region / city:
California
Theme:
Water Quality, Environmental Assessment
Document Type:
Technical Report
Organization / Institution:
Caltrans
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Environmental regulators, project managers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Idaho
Topic:
Conservation, Big Game Species
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)
Author:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Target Audience:
Wildlife managers, conservationists, land management authorities
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified