№ files_lp_3_process_9_63741
File format: docx
Character count: 3104
File size: 458 KB
The document is a step-by-step guide for reviewing an OSR submission after it has been amended, based on AIHW feedback, in the Health Data Portal.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Australia
Theme:
Health Data Management
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
AIHW
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Submission reviewers, health service representatives
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Health Data, Indigenous Health, nKPI, OSR
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Solving Health
Author:
Solving Health
Target Audience:
Health services, clinical information system vendors
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Last Update:
2019
Data Limitations:
Data extraction tool discrepancies, outdated reports
Validation Process:
CIS validation for nKPI and OSR reports
Related Resources:
Specifications for nKPI and OSR, CIS user guides
This document outlines the differences between two key reporting tools used for First Nations health data:
nKPI and OSR, discussing software compatibility, validation processes, and practical tips for health services.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Health Data Reporting
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Author:
Best Practice Software
Target Audience:
Health service providers using Best Practice software
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Maine
Topic:
Implementation Reviewer for Child Welfare Psychotropic Medication
Document Type:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Agency / Institution:
Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child and Family Services
Author:
Casandra Manson
Target Audience:
Potential bidders for the RFP
Validity Period:
Until September 16, 2025
Approval Date:
August 2025
Amendment Date:
None provided
Year:
2017
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Education, Peer Review
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of Education
Author:
U.S. Department of Education
Target Audience:
Potential Peer Reviewers for the Native Hawaiian Education Program
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2018
Region / City:
VAPORHCS
Topic:
Human Subjects Research Review
Document Type:
IRB Checklist
Institution:
VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
IRB Reviewers, Research Staff
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Research methodology, academic publishing
Document type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, academics, authors
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Manuscript Review
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
AMD
Author:
AMD
Target Audience:
Reviewers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2026-02-06
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Professional development, architecture
Document Type:
Job application information
Organ / institution:
Architects Registration Board (ARB)
Author:
Architects Registration Board (ARB)
Target audience:
Applicants for CPD Reviewer positions
Period of validity:
Up to 8 years
Approval Date:
September 2024
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / city:
South Africa
Topic:
Animal Research Ethics
Document Type:
Report
Institution:
North-West University
Author:
Ethics Review Committee
Target Audience:
Researchers, Ethics Committees
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
July 2019
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
Organisation:
Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB)
Programme:
Scottish National Standards for Information and Advice Providers (SNSIAP)
Document Type:
Role specification
Subject Area:
Peer review process for advice agencies
Relevant Sectors:
Housing, welfare benefits, money/debt
Contract Type:
One-year contract for services
Remuneration:
£390 per peer review; £195 per day for training sessions
Time Commitment:
Approximately two to three days per peer review; up to two reviews per month
Assessment Scope:
12 case files per topic
Assessment Components:
Diagnosis; Information & Advice; Support & Action
Decision-Making Body:
Moderation Committee
Confidentiality Requirement:
Data protection agreement with SLAB
Essential Experience:
Minimum five years’ experience in housing casework within the not-for-profit advice sector
Competency Areas:
Assessment skills; Mindset; Self-management and administration; Decision-making; Attention to detail; Communication; Confidentiality; Motivational; Equalities
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Science Education
Document Type:
Review Form
Organization / Institution:
NARST International Committee
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Reviewers and applicants in the LSEP program
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Veterinary Medicine / Certification
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
American College of Poultry Veterinarians
Author:
Karen Campbell
Target Audience:
Veterinary professionals and certification bodies
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
January 19, 2016
Revision Date:
May 6, 2010
Context:
Checklist for evaluating veterinary specialty organizations seeking recognition by the American Board of Veterinary Specialties.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Perth, Western Australia
Topic:
Transit Oriented Development (TOD), state policy, local planning
Document type:
Academic paper
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Urban planners, policymakers, researchers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Document Type:
Evaluation report template
Institution Type:
University
Review Body:
Appraisal Committee
Related Body:
Audit Committee
Process:
Expedited Review
Framework:
Revised QAF
Subject:
New Program Proposal Evaluation
Evaluation Scope:
Program Objectives, Requirements, Assessment, Admission, Resources, Quality Indicators
Intended User:
Lead Reviewer
Associated Meeting:
Appraisal Committee Meeting
Sections Included:
Follow-up Issues, Best Practices, Recommendations, Evaluation Criteria