№ lp_2_2_04858
File format: docx
Character count: 13453
File size: 67 KB
This checklist is intended for IRB members or Designated Reviewers to ensure compliance when evaluating research involving children as subjects under various regulatory criteria.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
University of Minnesota
Topic:
IRB Research Review
Document Type:
Worksheet
Organization / Institution:
University of Minnesota
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
IRB members, researchers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A worksheet outlining the criteria for approval of research by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), detailing the required considerations and safeguards for participant protection during research studies.
Document type:
Institutional Review Board checklist
Subject matter:
Waiver of written documentation of informed consent
Regulatory framework:
Human subjects research regulations
Related worksheet:
Criteria for Approval (HRP-314)
Review procedures:
Initial review, continuing review, modification, convened IRB review, expedited review
Applicability:
Research involving waiver of written documentation of consent
Risk level referenced:
Minimal Risk
FDA regulation status:
Not FDA-regulated
Rule referenced:
2018 Rule
Issuing body:
IRB Office
Responsible party:
Designated Reviewer or convened IRB
Consent provisions:
Oral consent script and written information requirements
Signature required:
Yes
Note:
IRB Number
Year:
2026
Document Type:
Checklist
Institution:
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Target Audience:
IRB Members, IRB Chair, Vice Chair, Research Compliance Administrator
Scope:
Research involving prisoners as subjects
Application:
Initial review, continuing review, modifications, expedited review
IRB Number:
Specified per protocol
Risk Assessment:
Minimal risk required for subjects
Selection Procedures:
Fair and random selection of prisoner participants
Information Delivery:
Comprehensible language for subjects
Follow-up Provision:
Arrangements for post-participation care considered
Prisoner Representation:
Included in review and documentation
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Human subjects research
Document type:
Instructional form
Organization / Institution:
Baylor University
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Researchers, IRB members
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Note:
IRB Number
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Bozeman, Montana
Field:
Plant Science, Ecology, Environmental Science, Agriculture
Document Type:
Scholarship application
Organization / institution:
Gallatin Empire Garden Club
Author:
Helen Tobol
Target audience:
Sophomore, junior students
Application deadline:
April 1 2025
Required documents:
Montana State University Transcript, two references, short story
Additional information:
$1000
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Maine
Topic:
Implementation Reviewer for Child Welfare Psychotropic Medication
Document Type:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Agency / Institution:
Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child and Family Services
Author:
Casandra Manson
Target Audience:
Potential bidders for the RFP
Validity Period:
Until September 16, 2025
Approval Date:
August 2025
Amendment Date:
None provided
Year:
2017
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Education, Peer Review
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of Education
Author:
U.S. Department of Education
Target Audience:
Potential Peer Reviewers for the Native Hawaiian Education Program
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2018
Region / City:
VAPORHCS
Topic:
Human Subjects Research Review
Document Type:
IRB Checklist
Institution:
VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
IRB Reviewers, Research Staff
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Research methodology, academic publishing
Document type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, academics, authors
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Manuscript Review
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
AMD
Author:
AMD
Target Audience:
Reviewers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2026-02-06
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Professional development, architecture
Document Type:
Job application information
Organ / institution:
Architects Registration Board (ARB)
Author:
Architects Registration Board (ARB)
Target audience:
Applicants for CPD Reviewer positions
Period of validity:
Up to 8 years
Approval Date:
September 2024
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / city:
South Africa
Topic:
Animal Research Ethics
Document Type:
Report
Institution:
North-West University
Author:
Ethics Review Committee
Target Audience:
Researchers, Ethics Committees
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
July 2019
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
Organisation:
Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB)
Programme:
Scottish National Standards for Information and Advice Providers (SNSIAP)
Document Type:
Role specification
Subject Area:
Peer review process for advice agencies
Relevant Sectors:
Housing, welfare benefits, money/debt
Contract Type:
One-year contract for services
Remuneration:
£390 per peer review; £195 per day for training sessions
Time Commitment:
Approximately two to three days per peer review; up to two reviews per month
Assessment Scope:
12 case files per topic
Assessment Components:
Diagnosis; Information & Advice; Support & Action
Decision-Making Body:
Moderation Committee
Confidentiality Requirement:
Data protection agreement with SLAB
Essential Experience:
Minimum five years’ experience in housing casework within the not-for-profit advice sector
Competency Areas:
Assessment skills; Mindset; Self-management and administration; Decision-making; Attention to detail; Communication; Confidentiality; Motivational; Equalities
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Science Education
Document Type:
Review Form
Organization / Institution:
NARST International Committee
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Reviewers and applicants in the LSEP program
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified