№ files_lp_4_process_1_25666
File format: docx
Character count: 2644
File size: 22 KB
This document provides the statutory definition, burden of proof, and elements of the crime for unlawful use of a telephone under Wisconsin law.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Wisconsin
Subject:
Criminal Law
Document Type:
Legal Instruction
Authority / Organization:
Wisconsin Judicial Council
Author:
Wisconsin Judicial Council
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Court Personnel
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
February 2025
Revision History:
Originally published in 1987, revised in 1992 and 2008, revised in 2025
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2019
Region / city:
Saudi Arabia, Istanbul
Subject:
Human rights, Extrajudicial killings
Document type:
Report
Institution:
Human Rights Council
Author:
Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions
Target audience:
Human rights advocates, policymakers, international law practitioners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Jurisdiction:
Florida
Statute:
§ 794.05, Fla. Stat.
Document type:
Jury instruction
Legal area:
Criminal law
Offense:
Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors
Defendant age requirement:
24 years or older
Victim age range:
16 or 17 years
Definitions included:
Sexual activity; Female genitals; Union; Object; Bona fide
Exclusions:
Acts done for bona fide medical purposes
Defenses addressed:
Ignorance or misrepresentation of age not a defense
Reclassification provision:
§ 775.0862, Fla. Stat. (school authority figure)
Lesser included offenses:
Unnatural and lascivious act (§ 800.02); Attempt (§ 777.04)
Case law cited:
Feliciano v. State; Phillips v. State; Lakey v. State; State v. Knighton; Flores v. State
Legislative note:
Terminology change effective October 1, 2022
Adoption and amendments:
Adopted 1998; amended 2015, 2018, and December 21, 2022
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Licensing and regulation of personal services
Document Type:
Statute
Issuing Authority:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Professionals in barbering, cosmetology, aesthetics, nail technology, hairstyling, and eyelash extensions
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document type:
Legal text
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Australia
Theme:
Regulation Impact Statement, Governance, Charities
Document Type:
Official Correspondence
Author:
Jason Lange
Target Audience:
Deputy Secretary, Revenue Group, The Treasury
Decision Period:
May 2021
Date of Approval:
18 May 2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Jurisdiction:
Colorado
Legal field:
Civil law
Subject:
Civil conspiracy
Document type:
Jury instruction
Chapter:
27
Section:
27:1
Instruction title:
Elements of Liability
Related sections:
27:2 Unlawful Means — Defined; 27:3 Unlawful Goal — Defined
Purpose:
Determination of liability in a civil conspiracy claim
Applicable standard:
Preponderance of the evidence
Court references:
Colorado Supreme Court; Colorado Court of Appeals
Statutory reference:
Section 13-21-111.5(4), C.R.S.
Source of authority:
Colorado case law including Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. Mulei (1989), Nelson v. Elway (1995), Contract Maintenance Co. v. Local No. 105 (1966), Lockwood Grader Corp. v. Bockhaus (1954), Walker v. Van Laningham (2006), Stauffer v. Stegemann (2006), Telluride Real Estate Co. v. Penthouse Affiliates, L.L.C. (1999), Magin v. DVCO Fuel Systems, Inc. (1999), Electrolux Corp. v. Lawson (1982)
Referenced cases on doctrine:
Saint John’s Church v. Scott (2008); Double Oak Construction, L.L.C. v. Cornerstone Development International, L.L.C. (2003); Schneider v. Midtown Motor Co. (1992); Falcon Broadband, Inc. v. Banning Lewis Ranch Metro. Dist. No. 1 (2018); Condo v. Conners (2010); Pierce v. Wiglesworth (1994); Semler v. Hellerstein (2016); Bewley v. Semler (2018); Giduck v. Niblett (2014)
Year:
1989
Region / City:
Colorado
Subject:
Civil Law, Tort Law
Document Type:
Legal Instruction
Organization / Institution:
Colorado Courts
Author:
Judicial Committee
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Attorneys, Judges
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
1989
Date of Changes:
2006
Context:
A legal instruction document detailing the elements and requirements for proving civil conspiracy claims, focusing on unlawful means and goals within Colorado civil law.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Robocalls, Call Authentication, Number Reassignment
Document Type:
Statement
Author:
Commissioner Brendan Carr
Target Audience:
General Public, Telecommunications Industry
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Study Summary 1.1 Please provide a brief summary of the study in the table below. A complete description of the study with detailed information should be provided in the body of the protocol. For sections not applicable to the study, mark them as N/A. Study Title Study Design Primary Objective/Purpose Secondary Objective(s)/Purposes Research Intervention(s) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT # Study Population Sample Size Study Duration for individual subjects Study Specific Abbreviations/ Definitions
Background 3.1 Provide the scientific or scholarly background for, rationale for, and significance of the research based on the existing literature and how will it add to existing knowledge. :
this section should be limited to only information directly related to the research questions and objectives. Do not include your full dissertation proposal. 3.2 Describe any relevant preliminary data (e.g. pilot data).
Procedures Involved 5.1 Describe and explain the study design. 5.2 Please select the methods that will be employed in this study (select all that apply):
☐ Audio/Video Recording ☐ Psychophysiological Recording ☐ Behavioral Interventions ☐ Record Review - Educational ☐ Behavioral Observations and Experimentations ☐ Record Review - Employee ☐ Deception ☐ Record Review- Medical ☐ Focus Groups ☐ Record Review - Other ☐ Interviews ☐ Specimen Collection or Analysis ☐ Investigational Medical Device – (e.g. Medical Mobile Applications) ☐ Surveys and/or Questionnaires ☐Psychometric Testing ☐ Other Social-Behavioral Procedures Provide a description of all research procedures being performed and when they are performed. (Upload any surveys, questionnaires, interview scripts, focus group scripts, debriefing scripts, psychometric tests, stimulus materials, intervention manuals, and data collection forms on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application.) 5.3 Describe the procedures or interventions that are going to be conducted as part of the research project, but that would have been conducted anyway, even if the research was not occurring (i.e. standard of care procedures, activities that would occur in a classroom). 5.4 Describe the procedures performed to lessen the probability or magnitude of risks of items selected in 5.2.5. 5 If accessing or collecting existing data, describe: The data that will be collected during the study (e.g. demographics, medical history, etc.). Attach the data capture sheet(s) on the Local Site Documents page in the IRB application. How the data will be obtained, including how you have the authority to access the data. The source or location of the data (e.g. USF Epic, TGH Epic, Hillsborough County School records, CANVAS records, publicly available databases, etc.). 5.6 If collecting and/or analyzing biological specimens, describe: How the biological specimens will be or have been collected. How the biological specimens will be stored. How long the biological specimens will be stored. How the biological specimens will be used. The laboratories that will be used. Whether the collected biological specimens will undergo genetic testing. If so, indicate if this study is part of a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) and whether the data will be forwarded to the NIH dbGaP. 5.7 If there are plans for long-term follow-up (once all research related procedures are complete), what data will be collected during this period.
Data and Specimen Storage for Future Research 6.1 If data or specimens will be banked for future research studies, describe where the data or specimens will be stored, how long it/they will b:
the process to request a release, approvals required for release, who can obtain data or specimens, and the data to be provided with specimens.
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
University of Southern California
Year:
2023
Clinical setting:
Telephone triage / Telephone consultation / Out of hours
Assessor’s email:
[Email]
Type of call:
Telephone triage / Telephone consultation / Out of hours
Assessor declaration:
I confirm that I have received appropriate training to complete this assessment form and that I am a consultant or a hospital doctor ST4 or above (or SAS equivalent) Yes
Title:
[Title of the Case]
Brief description of case:
[Up to 150 words]
Level of Complexity:
Low / Medium / High
Clinical experience groups covered by event:
[Choose maximum 2]
Grading:
[Performance levels for trainee competence in consultation tasks]
Assessment of performance:
[Overall competence rating based on observation]
Date of observation:
[Date]
Location:
[Location or Clinical Setting]
End of document:
[Confirmation and action plan for further development]
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Health plan enrollee experience survey
Document Type:
Survey script
Organization / Institution:
QHP Issuer
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
QHP enrollees
Period of Action:
July through December 2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Education, Curriculum and Instruction
Document Type:
Academic Program
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students of Ed.D. program
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
An academic program outline detailing the courses, requirements, and residency activities for students pursuing a Doctorate in Education with a concentration in Curriculum and Instruction.
Year:
20XX
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Topic:
Agricultural Survey
Document Type:
Survey Form
Organization:
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Author:
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
Target Audience:
Farm operators, ranchers, and survey respondents
Effective Period:
20XX
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Humboldt County, California
Subject:
Jail Management System, Inmate Telephone System, and Associated Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposal
Target Audience:
Bidders, Vendors, Service Providers
Effective Period:
July 22, 2019
Approval Date:
May 20, 2019
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Public services, automation
Document Type:
Report
Agency / Institution:
Social Security Administration (SSA)
Author:
Social Security Administration (SSA)
Target Audience:
General public, SSA service recipients
Period of Effectiveness:
End of September 2020
Approval Date:
N/A
Change Date:
N/A
Contextual Description:
Report outlining the justification for the implementation of a new telephone service to assist SSA recipients in updating their information, as part of SSA’s Digital Transformation Plan.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
West Virginia
Topic:
Telecommunications, Emergency Services, Wireless Communication
Document Type:
Legislative Rule
Authority:
Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Target Audience:
Telecommunications carriers, Emergency services providers
Effective Date:
December 3, 2018
Approval Date:
November 1, 2018
Amendment Date:
N/A
Study Title:
___________________________
Note:
Year
Updated:
05-08-2025
Jurisdiction:
California, USA
Applicable Entities:
All telephone corporations with operating authority under Pub. Utilities Code Sections 1001 and 1013 or CD Director approval
Exempt Entities:
Carriers of Last Resort (COLR), URF and GRC ILECs, Cox Communications as COLR
Bond Amount:
$25,000
Bond Type:
Continuous performance bond
Filing Requirements:
Initial filing via Advice Letter – Tier 1 within 30 days of operating authority; annual filing by March 31
Legal References:
Decisions D.10-09-017, D.11-09-026, D.13-05-035, D.24-11-003
Penalties:
$1,000 for noncompliance, with $200 increase for second citation
Contact:
[email protected]
Source Type:
Regulatory FAQ document