№ lp_2_3_58718
File format: docx
Character count: 17377
File size: 1127 KB
Year:
2023
Region / city:
NERC region
Topic:
Frequency Response, Compliance Monitoring
Document Type:
Compliance Audit Worksheet
Organization:
NERC
Author:
Compliance Enforcement Authority
Target Audience:
Registered entities and auditors
Period of Validity:
[Insert period]
Approval Date:
[Insert date]
Modification Date:
[Insert date]
Context:
A compliance audit worksheet for entities subject to the BAL-003-2 reliability standard, evaluating frequency response and bias setting in energy systems.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
7/8/2016
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Gender bias in student evaluations of teaching (SETs), race/ethnicity bias, bias against women in academia
Document Type:
Annotated bibliography
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Shari Stone-Mediatore
Target Audience:
Researchers, educators, academic professionals
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Research methodology, Bias, Data management
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
Zenodo
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Researchers, data managers, academic institutions
Action Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Year:
2019
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Risk of bias, prediction model studies
Document Type:
Research Tool / Guideline
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, Systematic Reviewers
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Subject:
Alcohol addiction, Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Document Type:
Research Article
Author:
Tess E. den Uyl, Thomas E. Gladwin, Mike Rinck, Johannes Lindenmeyer, Reinout W. Wiers
Target Audience:
Researchers, clinicians, and professionals in addiction and neuromodulation
Period of Action:
2017
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Author:
Desman Wilson
Institution:
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Degree:
Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Psychology
Academic Term:
Spring 2020
Document Type:
Undergraduate Honors Thesis
Field of Study:
Psychology
Research Topic:
Algorithmic bias and emotional outcomes
Methodology:
Experimental study with between-subjects design
Sample Size:
453 participants (28 excluded for failed attention checks)
Participant Recruitment Platform:
Amazon Mechanical Turk
Conditions:
Algorithm condition; Human condition
Keywords:
Bias; discrimination; algorithms; human-robot interaction
Date:
April 13, 2023
Time:
11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Location:
Monroe County Public Library Room 2A and Zoom
Facilitator:
Rebecca Nunley
Notes:
Melanie Vehslage
Organizing Body:
Monroe County Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP)
Workgroup:
Inequity, Discrimination and Bias (IDB)
Participating Organizations:
Monroe County Health Department (MCHD); IU Health Bloomington; Monroe Fire Protection District; CJAM; BTCC; Youth Services Bureau (YSB); Bloomington Police Department; Anthem Medicaid; Housing and Eviction Prevention Project; Bloomington Human Rights Commission
Primary Topics:
FindHelp program claim rate goals; Helping Bloomington Monroe platform; DEIA tools and resources; implicit bias training; complaint filing resources; community accountability principles; SMART goals planning
Goal Deadline:
December 31, 2024
Next Meeting Date:
May 8, 2023
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Canada
Topic:
Systemic Racism, Wrongful Convictions, Bias, Criminal Justice
Document Type:
Report, Webinar Resources
Organ / Institution:
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Heads of Prosecutions Committee
Author:
Bruce MacFarlane, Joshua Sealy-Harrington, Reakash Walters, Anthony Morgan, Lorna Fadden, Amanda Carling, Kenneth Jackson
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Law Students, Criminal Justice Reform Advocates
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
December 10, 2020
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A report and webinar resources detailing systemic racism, biases, and their impact on wrongful convictions, with contributions from multiple legal professionals and experts.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Seattle, WA
Topic:
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance, Transgender Reproductive Health
Document type:
Research Article
Organization / institution:
University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Author:
Diana M Tordoff, Michele Andrasik, Anjum Hajat
Target audience:
Researchers, Public Health Professionals, Transgender Health Advocates
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Name:
3.5 Practice - Sampling and Surveys Forms of Bias
Subject:
Statistics
Topic:
Sampling and survey bias
Type of document:
Educational worksheet
Educational level:
Secondary or introductory college statistics
Number of questions:
12
Concepts covered:
Undercoverage, Nonresponse bias, Response bias, Wording effects
Geographic references:
United States; El Paso, Texas
Related activities:
Survey design and bias analysis exercises
Purpose:
Analysis of bias in sampling and survey methods
Type of document:
Supplemental table
Subject:
Risk of bias assessment
Scope:
Included studies in a systematic review
Assessment domains:
Selection bias; Performance bias; Attrition bias; Detection bias; Statistical analysis; Applicability to patient group
Checklist items:
1.2–1.14
Studies assessed:
59 studies (Abelha 2012 – Yoshitaka 2013)
Study design categories:
Cohort
Rating symbols:
●; ○; ?; n/a
Quality grading:
++; +; −
Publication period of included studies:
2001–2016
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Australia, Canberra
Theme:
Health equity, gender and sex bias in healthcare
Document type:
Literature review
Organization:
Department of Health and Aged Care, Commonwealth of Australia
Authors:
Dr Maggie Kirkman, Dr Tomoko Honda, Professor Jane Fisher, Steve McDonald, Lorena Romero, Professor Sally Green, Professor Karen Walker-Bone, Professor Ingrid Winship
Target audience:
Health policymakers, researchers, clinicians
Scope:
Analysis of sex and gender disparities in Australian health system, including barriers, clinical guidelines, interventions, and data gaps
Publication date:
2024
References included:
Yes, with appendices covering methodology, data extraction, and guidelines
Language:
English
Format:
Report with summary, recommendations, results, and appendices
Contextual description:
Systematic review and analysis of published studies, policies, and guidelines to identify and address sex and gender bias in healthcare delivery and research in Australia.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Galaxy Clustering, Astrophysics
Document Type:
Research Paper
Institution:
3D-HST Survey, CANDELS
Author:
Alena Casella, Cullen Abelson, William Bowman, Donghui Jeong, Robin Ciardullo
Target Audience:
Researchers, Astrophysicists
Period of Activity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Author:
Justin Baeder
Institution:
The Principal Center
Target Audience:
Educational administrators, instructional leaders
Document Type:
Article
Topic:
Observability bias in teaching practice
Region/City:
United States
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / city:
International
Topic:
Diagnostic accuracy studies
Document type:
Guidance document
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals
Effective period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
California
Subject:
Reliability requirements for resource adequacy and capacity procurement
Document Type:
Business Practice Manual
Organization / Institution:
California ISO
Author:
Dede Subakti
Target Audience:
Load-serving entities, capacity procurement participants
Period of validity:
From 05/01/18
Approval Date:
03/27/09
Date of last revision:
10/05/2020
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Extreme Cold Weather Preparedness
Document type:
Audit worksheet
Organization:
North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
Author:
Compliance Enforcement Authority (CEA)
Target audience:
Registered entities subject to NERC standards
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
N/A
Date of modifications:
N/A
Note:
Audit ID
Note:
Audit ID
Text with blue background:
Fixed text – do not edit
Text entry area with Green background:
Entity-supplied information
Text entry area with white background:
Auditor-supplied information
Compliance Narrative (Required):
Provide a brief explanation, in your own words, of how you comply with this Requirement. References to supplied evidence, including links to the appropriate page, are recommended.
Evidence Requested:
Provide the following evidence, or other evidence to demonstrate compliance.
Registered Entity Evidence (Required):
The following information is requested for each document submitted as evidence. Also, evidence submitted should be highlighted and bookmarked, as appropriate, to identify the exact location where evidence of compliance may be found.
Note to Auditor:
Auditors are advised to monitor compliance with Requirement R1 during events, due to the importance of issuing Operating Instructions in such instances. Auditors can obtain a population of events for sampling from NERC’s, or the Regional Entity’s, records of mandatory event reports, other information available at the Regional Entities, or a query of the entity. Auditors are encouraged to monitor compliance during the most critical events on the entity’s system occurring during the compliance monitoring period.
Registered Entity Response (Required):
Question: Did the entity receive an Operating Instruction from the Reliability Coordinator during the audit period?
If No, state how this was ascertained. If yes, provide a list of instances of receiving Operating Instructions from the Reliability Coordinator. [Note:
A separate spreadsheet or other document may be used. If so, provide the document reference below.]
Year:
2006
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Reliability Standards, Compliance
Document Type:
Audit Worksheet
Organization / Institution:
NERC
Author:
NERC
Target Audience:
Registered Entities, Compliance Enforcement Authority
Effective Period:
From 6/18/2007
Approval Date:
11/1/2006
Amendment Date:
3/16/2007