№ lp_1_2_45179
File format: docx
Character count: 9560
File size: 106 KB
The document outlines the process for conducting a DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service) risk assessment for individuals applying to work or volunteer with vulnerable groups, specifying requirements for DBS checks, related policies, and procedural guidelines for assessing applicants before their DBS certificates are received.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Oxfordshire
Theme:
Employment / Risk Assessment
Document Type:
Policy / Form
Organization:
Oxfordshire County Council
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Hiring Managers, HR, Staff working with vulnerable groups
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Changes:
Unknown
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Agency / Institution:
Catholic Safeguarding Standards Agency (CSSA)
Contextual description:
Information on the DBS disclosure process and the types of criminal record checks available for specific roles within the Catholic Church in England and Wales.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Identity Verification, DBS Check
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
Catholic Safeguarding Standards Agency
Target Audience:
Individuals applying for a DBS check
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
File Transfer Protocol, Managed File Transfer
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS)
Author:
DBS
Target Audience:
DBS and Registered Body (RB) Project Teams, implementers, developers, technical architects, testers
Scope:
Interface between DBS Managed File Transfer Service (MFTS) and Registered Bodies’ systems
Approval Date:
19/02/2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Interface Type:
FTP
Technology:
FTPS, TLS, XML
Data Type:
XML, Text
Message Type:
eBulk Applications Batch, eBulk Applications Batch Rejection
Description:
A technical specification for the eBulk interface that defines file transfer procedures between the DBS MFTS and Registered Bodies’ systems using FTP and FTPS protocols.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Diocese of Salford
Topic:
Safeguarding, DBS checks, Volunteer Recruitment
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
Diocese of Salford
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parish volunteers and safeguarding representatives
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Context:
A document outlining various identity verification routes for DBS applications in the UK, specifying required documents for each route and additional procedures such as fingerprinting.
Year:
2026
Region:
Not specified
Document type:
Supplementary material / Research data
Methods:
LC-MS/MS, IP–HILIC–MS/MS
Analytes:
Tenofovir (TFV), Tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP)
Sample types:
Urine, Dried Blood Spots (DBS)
Target population:
Participants on antiretroviral therapy (ART)
Measured variables:
Urine TFV concentration, DBS TFV-DP concentration, POC TFV results, self-reported adherence, viral load, drug resistance
Instrument:
Agilent HPLC coupled to AB Sciex 5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer
Software:
Analyst v1.6.2
Detection method:
Negative-ion multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)
Tables included:
S1, S2, S3, S4
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Form
Target Audience:
Bank Exclusive and Bank Only applicants, existing bank members
Contextual Description:
Form used by bank applicants and existing members for DBS Update Service check, including consent and privacy policy declarations.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Dublin
Subject:
Higher Education
Document Type:
College Handbook
Organization / Institution:
Dublin Business School (DBS)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students of Dublin Business School
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Child safeguarding in cricket
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB)
Author:
England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB)
Target Audience:
Cricket clubs, coaches, volunteers, administrators, safeguarding officers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
August 2018
Revision Date:
None
Year:
not specified
Region / county:
Shropshire
Country:
United Kingdom
Subject:
safeguarding of children in schools
Document type:
agreement and procedural guidance
Issuing body:
Shropshire Council
Department:
Property Services Group
Related authority:
Department for Education
Legal framework:
Keeping Children Safe in Education; Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006
Target group:
contractors and self-employed contractors working in schools
Scope:
contractors and contractor employees entering Shropshire schools
Requirements:
Disclosure and Barring Service checks
Approval responsibility:
schools and Shropshire Council Schools HR Team
Appendices:
DBS Record template; guidance notes for completion
Validity conditions:
continuous employment and DBS currency
Contact bodies:
Shropshire Employment Services; Schools HR Team
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Safeguarding
Document Type:
Self-Declaration Form
Institution:
Catholic Church of England & Wales
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Individuals applying for safeguarding roles within the Church
Period of Validity:
10 years and 1 day after the individual leaves the role
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Retention Policy:
Document retained for 10 years and 1 day or until a new DBS form is processed
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Cardiff
Topic:
Job description
Document Type:
Job Posting
Organization:
Church in Wales
Author:
Human Resources
Target Audience:
Potential candidates
Effective Date:
26 September 2025
Closing Date:
26 September 2025
Interview Date:
7 October 2025
Required Qualifications:
Microsoft Word, Excel skills, financial literacy
Desired Qualifications:
Experience in charity/trust administration, Welsh language skills
Job Location:
2 Callaghan Square, Cardiff, CF10 5BT
Contract Type:
Permanent
Working Hours:
Full time (34.75 hours per week)
Salary:
£28,610 – £32,370
Context:
A job posting for a Trusts and DBS Administrator position at the Church in Wales’ national office in Cardiff, responsible for trust administration and safeguarding services across the organization.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Employee Criminal Record Declaration
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
MacIntyre Charity
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Employees required to complete DBS update
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Recruitment
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Age UK Derby & Derbyshire
Target Audience:
Job applicants
Note:
Year
Theme:
Child development, Early Years Education
Document type:
Progress Check
Target audience:
Parents, caregivers, childcare providers
Contextual description:
A progress check document assessing the developmental milestones of a child at age two, focusing on key areas such as communication, physical, social, and emotional development, completed by the childcare provider.
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Wisconsin
Topic:
Background Check Consent
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Wisconsin Department of Administration
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Administration
Target Audience:
Job applicants in Wisconsin
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
European Space Agency
Topic:
Space Technology, Business Incubation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
European Space Agency Business Incubation Centres (ESA BICs)
Author:
European Space Agency
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, ESA BIC Applicants
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
23/06/2020
Modification Date:
30/09/2022
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters