№ files_lp_4_process_3_113881
File format: docx
Character count: 16636
File size: 43 KB
Year:
2003–2010
Population:
Male and female trained and untrained athletes and students
Age range:
19–29 years
Measurements:
Sit and Reach, AKE ROM, CMJ, DJ, SJ, VJ, Max stretch and muscle power, Bat swings
Warm-up types:
Static stretching, dynamic stretching, active warm-up, cardiovascular warm-up, weighted vest warm-up, drop jumps
Interventions:
Stretching protocols, warm-up routines, resistance exercises
Outcomes:
Flexibility, power, muscular strength/endurance, cardiovascular performance
Study design:
Single and double test interventions with control and treatment groups
Sample size:
7–68 participants per study
Population location:
International, including Spain, Australia, USA
Bias assessment:
Varies by study (MIN, +, ++)
Publication type:
Supplemental digital content for research article
Context:
Research table presenting quantitative results of experimental interventions on flexibility, power, and muscular performance in military-relevant and athletic populations across multiple studies
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Handling Information and Data, Statistics
Document Type:
Educational Content
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Learners preparing for Functional Skills Maths Level 2
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Subject:
Statistics
Type of document:
Educational / Instructional material
Topics covered:
Median, Mode, Frequency Distribution, Grouped Data
Target audience:
Students, learners of statistics
Data sets included:
Monthly electricity consumption, Farm sizes, Student heights, Shoe sizes, Marks distribution
Methods explained:
Median calculation for grouped and ungrouped data, Mode calculation, Cumulative frequency, Class intervals
Examples provided:
Numerical examples with step-by-step solutions
Source type:
Textbook excerpt / Educational resource
Publisher / Institution:
Not specified
Format:
Text with tables and formulas
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Acute pancreatitis, Obesity, Malnutrition
Document type:
Research data table
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Medical professionals, Researchers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
California, USA
Subject:
Building code amendments and accessibility standards
Document Type:
Regulatory code compilation
Organization / Institution:
Division of the State Architect (DSA-AC)
Author:
DSA-AC
Target Audience:
Architects, engineers, code officials, and educational institutions
Effective Period:
2025 onward
Referenced Standards:
A17.1-2019/CSA B44-19, A18.1-2020, A156.10-2017, A156.19-2019
Document Structure:
Chapters 2, 11B, 35 with grouped item proposals
Content Focus:
Public housing, educational facilities, social service centers, accessibility compliance
Format Details:
Model code text with amendments, strikeouts, and underlined changes
Note:
Year
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Theme:
Animal Welfare, Research Protocol
Document Type:
Research Guidance
Institution:
Australian National University (ANU)
Author:
ANU Veterinary Services
Target Audience:
Researchers, Animal Technicians, Veterinary Staff
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Regulatory framework:
UGC Regulations, 2018
Document type:
Annexure / Appendix table
Appendix reference:
Annexure-II, Appendix II, Table-2
Issuing body:
University Grants Commission
Country:
India
Purpose:
Assessment of academic and research performance of teachers
Assessment basis:
Documentary evidence submitted by the teacher
Covered activities:
Research publications, books, ICT-based pedagogy, MOOCs, research guidance, projects, consultancy, patents, policy documents, awards, invited lectures
Target group:
University and college teachers
Scoring authority:
University
Verification authority:
University
Note:
Year
Author:
Edward James Martin, Fredrick Arthur, Harry Jonathan
Keywords:
Text classification; Semantic Web with weighted idf feature; Expanded query; Fuzzy Semantic Web; Fuzzy Ranking Algorithm.
Contextual description:
Research paper focusing on enhancing the ranking algorithm of the Semantic Web by integrating fuzziness and weighted scores in the context of web search and metadata storage.
Year:
2024/2025
Region/City:
Minneapolis/Hennepin County
Theme:
Homelessness, Housing Stability
Document Type:
Procedural Guide
Organization/Institution:
Hennepin County/Minneapolis Continuum of Care
Author:
CoC Funding Committee
Target Audience:
Community stakeholders, housing organizations, and homeless service providers
Effective Period:
FY2024/2025
Approval Date:
June 20, 2024
Amendment Date:
May 16, 2024
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Access keys, staff management, MDS evaluations
Document type:
Guideline
Organization:
Riverside Insights
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Staff involved in MDS evaluations
Period of validity:
Through December 31, 2027
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Animal Welfare, Research Protocol
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization:
Australian National University
Author:
ANU Veterinary Services
Target Audience:
Researchers, Animal Technicians, Veterinary Staff
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
Guidelines for assessing the health and welfare of older mice in research using a standardized scoring system in line with ethical protocols.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Animal welfare, Pain assessment
Document type:
Template, Guidance
Institution:
ANU
Target audience:
Researchers, animal technicians, veterinary staff
Contextual description:
Guide for researchers to assess mouse health and welfare through a scoring system based on visible indicators of pain, distress, and overall condition.
Version:
V2.0
Institution:
Australian National University
Document type:
Animal welfare guidance
Species:
Mouse
Procedure:
Oral gavage
Assessment system:
Mouse Score System with Mouse Grimace Scale
Monitoring period:
Seven days post oral gavage
Scoring range:
0–3
Humane endpoints:
Defined by score criteria
Approval authority:
Animal Ethics Committee
Veterinary contact:
ANU Veterinary Services
Record keeping:
Cage card and relevant database
Interventions:
Supportive therapies and euthanasia criteria
Note:
Risk Assessment of Blood Glucose Meter Use and Related Safety Protocols
Year:
2021
Region / City:
RUH
Topic:
Blood Glucose Meter Safety Protocols
Document Type:
Standard Operating Procedure
Organization:
RUH
Author:
N. Hodges
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals involved in point-of-care testing
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
21/10/21
Amendment Date:
None
Year:
2019
Region / City:
South Africa
Subject:
Regulatory documentation for pharmaceutical registration
Document type:
Regulatory submission
Authority/Organization:
SAHPRA (South African Health Products Regulatory Authority)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Pharmaceutical manufacturers, regulatory affairs professionals
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
2019/01/31
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Stroke risk assessment in Atrial Fibrillation patients
Document Type:
Research Supplementary File
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, researchers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Air Emission Profiles, SPECIATE Database
Document Type:
Evaluation Framework / Methodology
Organization:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Authors:
C.D. Bray, M. Strum, H. Simon, L. Riddick, M. Kosusko, M. Menetrez, M.D. Hays, V. Rao
Target Audience:
Environmental researchers, data reviewers
Reference:
Atmospheric Environment 207, 93-104, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.013
Evaluation Criteria:
Data from measurements, Data from other methods, Sampling design, Measurement methodologies, Data reduction/statistics, Speciation completeness
Scoring System:
QSCORE 0–30 (Measurements), QSCORE 0–29 (Other Methods)
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Genomics, Genetics
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
Rutgers University, NIH
Author:
Matteo Di Vincenzo, Thanavadee Prachason, Gaia Sampogna, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao Danae Lin, Lotta-Katrin Pries, Jim van Os, Bart P.F. Rutten, Ran Barzilay, Andrea Fiorillo, Sinan Guloksuz
Target Audience:
Researchers, Geneticists, Biologists
Period of Activity:
2023
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Document type:
Supplementary material
Subject:
CT radiomics analysis of ground-glass nodules (GGNs)
Imaging modality:
Computed tomography (CT)
Slice thickness:
3 mm; 1 mm
Study groups:
Benign GGNs (n = 23); Malignant GGNs (n = 92); Adenocarcinoma group (n = 92; n = 54 for 1 mm CT)
Statistical methods:
Propensity score matching; Logistic regression model; LASSO algorithm; 10-fold cross-validation; ROC analysis; Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Matching ratio:
1:4
C-statistic:
0.7261
Matching method:
Greed matching within specified caliper distances
Distance metric:
0.7
Use of replacement:
With replacement
Feature categories:
Conventional indices; First order features; Second order features (GLCM, GLRLM, NGLDM, GLZLM)
Outcome measures:
AUC value; Rad-score; P-values for texture feature comparison