№ files_lp_3_process_9_32799
File format: docx
Character count: 2049
File size: 25 KB
Year:
2026
Region / City:
International / Arctic
Theme:
Arctic Science Coordination
Document Type:
Team Composition / Organizational List
Organization:
European Commission, Arctic Council, SAON, IASC, AMAP, and affiliated research institutions
Authors:
Attilio Gambardella, David Arthurs, Eva Kruemmel, Hajo Eicken, Halldór Jóhannsson, Margareta Johansson, Jan Rene Larsen, Nicole Biebow, Roberto Delgado, Stein Sandven, Tom Christensen, Sandy Starkweather, Sarah Kalhok, Yuji Kodama, Allen Pope, Anders Turesson, Carolina Behe, Cathy Coon, Craig Larlee, Doug Cripe, Cynthia Jacobson, Elizabeth McLanahan, Etienne Charptentier, Rodica Nitu, Finn Danielsen, Heikki Lihavainen, Inger Johanne Wiese, Jackie Grebmeier, Jens Peter Holst-Andersen, Kirsi Latola, Kelly Falkner, Larry Hinzman, Lars Kullerud, Lisa Loseto, Mikko Strahlendorff, Nick Hughes, Roberta Pirazzini, Raychelle Daniel, Sophie Seeyave, Soren Rysgaard, Stefán Skjaldarson, Thorsteinn Gunnarsson, Vito Vitale, Will Ambrose
Target Audience:
Arctic research institutions, policymakers, international science programs
Period Covered:
2026
Affiliations:
European Commission, Polar View, ICC, University of Alaska Fairbanks, ArcticPortal, University of Lund, SAON, AWI, National Science Foundation, INTAROS, CBMP, US Arctic Observing Network, Northern Contaminants Program, NIPR, IASC, AMAP, Department of the Interior, GEO Secretariat, CAFF, PAME, WMO, Nordic Foundation for Development and Ecology, SIOS, ACAP, DBO, EPPR, University of Oulu, FMI, Met Norway, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, SDWG, Rannis Chair, Coastal Carolina University
Context:
Official list of drafting and review team members for Arctic science coordination under international and intergovernmental programs, detailing affiliations and roles.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Arctic
Theme:
Indigenous Peoples, Human Rights, Climate Change, Free, Prior and Informed Consent
Document Type:
Written Submission
Organization / Institution:
Just Atonement Inc.
Author:
Dave-Inder Comar
Target Audience:
Human rights organizations, legal professionals, international law experts, policymakers
Period of Effectiveness:
2023-ongoing
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Anchorage, Alaska
Theme:
Arctic Security and Research
Document Type:
Biographies of Speakers
Organization:
Alaskan Command, USNORTHCOM, NORAD
Author:
Various Arctic Experts
Target Audience:
Military and Security Professionals, Researchers, Arctic Policy Makers
Period of Activity:
3-6 May 2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2010
Region / city:
Arctic Region
Theme:
Hydrographic Commission, Arctic
Document type:
Statutes
Organization / institution:
International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission (ARHC)
Author:
Hydrographic Offices of Canada, Kingdom of Denmark, Norway, Russian Federation, United States of America
Target audience:
IHO Member States, Arctic States, Hydrographic Offices
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2010-10-06
Amendment date:
2021- TBD
Document symbol:
WIPO/IPTK/YFB/19/INF/4
Language:
English
Date:
March 27, 2019
Event title:
Practical Workshop on Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions for Countries from the Arctic Region
Type of document:
Program
Organizers:
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO); Government of Canada
Collaborating organization:
Nunavut Tunngavik Inc.
Prepared by:
International Bureau of WIPO
Location:
Iqaluit, Canada
Event dates:
May 14 to 16, 2019
Participants:
Government officials and IPLC representatives from Canada, Finland and Sweden
Objectives:
Foster cooperation between government officials and indigenous peoples and local communities; impart basic knowledge of IP principles, systems and tools in relation to TK and TCEs; facilitate exchanges on experiences and best practices
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Arctic
Topic:
Arctic Observations, Environmental Change, Research Networks
Document Type:
Proposal
Agency / Institution:
NSF-AON
Authors:
Hajo Eicken, Sandy Starkweather, Henry W. Loescher, Raychelle Daniel, Peter Pulsifer, Matt Jones, Amber Budden, Will Ambrose, Alice Bradley, Craig Lee, Cecilia Bitz, An Nguyen, Patrick Heimbach, Scott Rupp, Craig Tweedie
Target Audience:
Researchers, Policy Makers, Arctic Scientists, Indigenous Communities
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
May 31, 2019
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2025
Region:
Canadian Arctic (Yukon, Northwest Territories, Inuvialuit Settlement Region, Nunavut, Nunavik, Nunatsiavut)
Type of document:
Nomination template
Organization:
Arctic Inspiration Youth Prize
Target audience:
Youth project teams and their ambassadors/nominators
Sections:
Nomination Letter, Administrative Information and Budget, Project Information, Letters of Recommendation and Partner Support
Submission requirements:
Completed sections, optional video responses for Section 3
Maximum funding:
$100,000
Deadline:
2025
Year:
2010
Region / city:
Korea
Theme:
Fisheries Industry, Seafood Industrialization, Green Growth, Food Industry
Document Type:
Policy Proposal
Organization:
Korean Government
Author:
Joo, Moon-Bae
Target Audience:
Policymakers, Fisheries Industry Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
Until 2012
Approval Date:
June, 2010
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021-2027
Region / City:
Northern Periphery and Arctic
Topic:
EU Funding, Project Management
Document Type:
Grant Letter
Organization:
Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme
Author:
Monitoring Committee / Managing Authority
Target Audience:
Project Partners, Lead Partners, Funding Authorities
Period of Effect:
2021-2027
Approval Date:
09-09-2022
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Legal Provisions:
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2018/1046, EU Structural and Investment Funds Regulations
Project Co-financing:
ERDF, De Minimis, General Block Exemption Regulation
Summary:
The document outlines the approval and conditions of the main project funding under the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme, detailing the funding structure, legal framework, and responsibilities of project partners.
Note:
Year
Theme:
Winter, Arctic, Climate
Document Type:
Educational Resource
Target Audience:
Children, Parents, Educators
Title:
Supplementary Figures for CMIP6 Projected Trend of Winter and Summer Variation in Arctic Cyclones over the 21st Century
Authors:
Song Jianing; Xu Ying; Han Zhenyu; Wu Jie
Affiliations:
National Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China; National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China; Laboratory for Climate Studies, National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China; School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi
Journal:
Journal of Climate
Submission date:
September 2023
Document type:
Supplementary figures
Subject:
Arctic cyclones; seasonal variation; projection trends; CMIP6 scenarios
Scenarios analyzed:
SSP1-2.6; SSP5-8.5
Reference period:
1995–2014
Projection period:
2015–2100; 2081–2100
Seasons covered:
Winter (DJF); Summer (JJA)
Variables analyzed:
Cyclone track density; merge and split event density; intensity; radius; speed; maximum deepening rates; extreme cyclone density; geopotential height at 300 hPa
Spatial domain:
Arctic
Year:
2025
Document Type:
Nomination template
Program Name:
Arctic Inspiration Youth Prize
Prize Category:
Arctic Inspiration Youth Prize
Eligible Regions:
Yukon; Northwest Territories; Inuvialuit Settlement Region; Nunavut; Nunavik; Nunatsiavut
Maximum Funding Amount:
$100,000
Required Sections:
Nomination Letter; Administrative Information and Budget; Project Information; Letters of Recommendation and Partner Support
Submission Requirements:
Completed written sections with optional video responses for Section 3; signed nomination letter by Ambassador/Nominator and Team Leader
Budget Components:
Salaries and Benefits; Equipment and Facility; Materials and Supplies; Travel; Communications; Project Activities; Other Items; Impact Assessment
Impact Assessment Allocation:
$4000 retained from total prize amount requested
Target Participants:
Youth project teams in the Canadian Arctic
Geographic Scope:
Canadian Arctic
Year:
2023
Date:
7 June 2023
Time:
11.30 am
Committee:
International Relations and Defence Committee
Document Type:
Corrected oral evidence transcript
Evidence Session Number:
7
Format:
Heard in Public
Question Numbers:
82–92
Location:
United Kingdom Parliament
Subject:
Arctic shipping and maritime development
Witnesses:
Elise Nyborg; Morten Glamsø
Affiliations:
UK Chamber of Shipping; Danish Shipping
Chair:
Lord Ashton of Hyde
Participating Members:
Lord Anderson of Swansea; Baroness Coussins; Lord Robertson of Port Ellen; Lord Stirrup; Baroness Sugg; Lord Teverson
Focus:
Economic significance, risks, and future trends of Arctic shipping for the UK and Denmark
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Avanersuaq, Kalaallit Nunaat (NW Greenland)
Topic:
Radiocarbon dating, Early Paleo-Inuit watercraft, High Arctic maritime lifeways
Document type:
Academic article
Author:
Matthew Walls, M. Kleist, P. Knudsen
Target audience:
Researchers in archaeology, radiocarbon dating, and Arctic studies
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Calibration method:
Marine 20 curve, Marine13 calibration
Marine correction applied:
ΔR for Zone 5 (West Greenland)
References:
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Heaton, T.J. et al. 2020. Pearce, C. et al. 2023.
Year:
2014
Location:
Reykjavik, Iceland
Theme:
Security of the Arctic, Geopolitics, Environmental and Human Security
Document Type:
Final Report
Organizing Institutions:
University of the Arctic, Northern Research Forum
Author:
Prof. Lassi Heininen
Participants:
Researchers and experts in Arctic security studies
Sessions:
4 breakout sessions covering Arctic security, military strategies, environmental and human security, regional sovereignty
Funding:
Social Sciences Working Group of IASC
Date of Completion:
February 9, 2015
Period Covered:
October 31 – November 2, 2014
Target Audience:
Academics, policy makers, and Arctic region stakeholders
Format:
Academic panel proceedings with presentations and discussions
Year:
2003
Country:
United States
Region:
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska
Topic:
Environmental conservation; oil drilling debate; wilderness protection
Document type:
Book foreword excerpt with classroom response prompts
Author of excerpt:
Jimmy Carter
Source work:
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, a Photographic Journey
Book author:
Subhankar Banerjee
Institutional context:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service management of the refuge
Historical references:
Establishment of Arctic National Wildlife Range (1960); Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (1980)
Referenced political figure:
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Referenced indigenous group:
Gwich’in Athabascan Indians
Educational use:
Reading passage for rhetorical analysis
Intended audience:
Students studying rhetoric or environmental policy
Key themes:
Arctic ecosystem, wildlife migration, indigenous livelihoods, energy policy debate
Geographical scope:
Northeastern Alaska and the Beaufort Sea coastal plain
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Joint venture formation
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Solicitors, legal professionals
Year:
2023
Region / city:
California
Topic:
Anti-SLAPP motions
Document type:
Legal guide
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Legal professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year