№ lp_1_2_71711
File format: docx
Character count: 26367
File size: 50 KB
This is a service contract between a company and a service provider outlining the terms, obligations, and conditions for the provision of services.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Theme:
Tourism, Event Sponsorship
Document Type:
Agreement
Organization:
Tourism KwaZulu-Natal (TKZN), Durban FilmMart Institute (DFMI)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parties involved in the Durban FilmMart 2024
Period of Validity:
From the effective date until the completion of the event and fulfillment of obligations
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
1995, amended 2007, 2008, 2013, 2020, 2021, 2024
Jurisdiction:
Florida, United States
Subject:
Criminal Law, Stalking, Cyberstalking
Document Type:
Jury Instruction / Legal Guideline
Governing Law:
§ 784.048(4), Fla. Stat.
Referenced Cases:
Patterson v. State, 512 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Seese v. State, 955 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Pallas v. State, 636 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
Offenses Covered:
Aggravated stalking, violation of injunctions, harassment, cyberstalking
Definitions Included:
Willfully, Maliciously, Harass, Course of conduct, Cyberstalk
Amendment Dates:
1995, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2020, December 15, 2021, March 8, 2024
Special Instructions:
First Amendment defense considerations
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Financial Administration, Lease Management
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization / Institution:
SAB, Agency
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Agencies, SAB
Period of Validity:
June 14 - July 25, 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
North West
Subject:
Contractor Information
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
North West Government
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Government officials, contractors
Period of Validity:
2018-2022
Approval Date:
2022
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Gauteng
Theme:
Engineering, Contract Management, Railway Infrastructure
Document Type:
Contract Agreement
Organization / Institution:
PRASA (Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors, Engineers, and Legal Professionals in Railway Infrastructure Projects
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Completion Deadline:
Not specified
Contract Value:
Not specified
Key Areas:
Railway signalling system, design and construction
Context:
A detailed agreement for the design, construction, and implementation of a fully integrated signalling and train management system in Gauteng, covering multiple geographical regions.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
eThekwini Municipality
Subject:
Performance Agreement
Document Type:
Employment Contract
Organization / Institution:
eThekwini Municipality
Author:
eThekwini Municipality
Target Audience:
Employee of eThekwini Municipality
Period of Effect:
1 July 2023 – 30 June 2024
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Purpose:
Compliance with the provisions of Section 57(1)(b), (4A),(4B), and (5) of the Systems Act
Objective:
Set performance targets and accountabilities for the employee
Employee Name:
Kim Makhathini
Position:
Deputy City Manager: Corporate & Human Capital Cluster
Job Role:
Performance Management
Commencement Date:
1 July 2023
End Date:
30 June 2024
Performance Review Period:
Annual
Evaluation Criteria:
KPAs (Key Performance Areas) and Competency Framework Structure
Performance Objectives:
Defined in the Performance Plan (Annexure A)
Performance Assessment:
Based on targets, key performance indicators, and outcomes
Context:
A formal document setting clear performance targets, standards, and review procedures for an employee in the municipal government sector.
Year:
2021
Company:
BAKSA EDUCARE PRIVATE LIMITED (OPC)
Document Type:
Board Resolution Extract
Section:
Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014
Resolution Number:
1
Appointment:
GAURAV D SHARMA & ASSOCIATES as Statutory Auditors
Financial Years Covered:
2021-22 to 2026-27
Authorized Signatory:
Arabinda Das, Director
DIN:
07257772
Date of Entry:
24th September 2021
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Network security, SMTP, packet filtering, password cracking
Document Type:
Academic exercise / technical question
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students in networking or security courses
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
WJEC Privacy Notice for Learners Entered for Eduqas Qualifications in Summer Examination Series 2020
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Wales, United Kingdom
Subject:
Data Privacy
Document Type:
Privacy Notice
Organization / Institution:
WJEC
Author:
WJEC
Target Audience:
Learners entered for Eduqas Qualifications, schools, and examination centers
Effective Period:
Summer Examination Series 2020
Approval Date:
18th March 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Doncaster
Subject:
Early Years Inclusion Funding for SEND children
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization:
Doncaster Local Authority
Author:
Doncaster Council
Target Audience:
Schools and early years providers in Doncaster
Period of Validity:
Autumn Term 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Incident Investigation
Document Type:
Report
Target Audience:
Management, HR, Investigation Team
Note:
Year
Subject:
Organic Certification
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
CERES
Author:
CERES
Target audience:
Exporters and Importers
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Fantasy, Role-playing
Document Type:
Supplement
Author:
Shubu Sibbly
Target Audience:
Dungeons and Dragons players and game masters
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Contextual Description:
A supplement for Dungeons and Dragons detailing the integration of the Wolly species, including their history, design, and gameplay guidance in 5e.
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
South Carolina
Theme:
Recognition, Sports, Education
Document Type:
House Resolution
Organ / Institution:
South Carolina House of Representatives
Author:
Reps. Calhoon, Alexander, Anderson, Atkinson, Bailey, Ballentine, Bamberg, Bannister, Bauer, Beach, Bernstein, Bowers, Bradley, Brewer, Brittain, Burns, Bustos, Caskey, Chapman, Chumley, Clyburn, Cobb-Hunter, Collins, Cox, Crawford, Cromer, Davis, Dillard, Duncan, Edgerton, Erickson, Ford, Forrest, Frank, Gagnon, Garvin, Gatch, Gibson, Gilliam, Gilliard, Gilreath, Govan, Grant, Guest, Guffey, Haddon, Hager, Hardee, Harris, Hart, Hartnett, Hartz, Hayes, Henderson-Myers, Herbkersman, Hewitt, Hiott, Hixon, Holman, Hosey, Howard, Huff, J.E. Johnson, J.L. Johnson, Jones, Jordan, Kilmartin, King, Kirby, Landing, Lastinger, Lawson, Ligon, Long, Lowe, Luck, Magnuson, Martin, McCabe, McCravy, McDaniel, McGinnis, C. Mitchell, D. Mitchell, Montgomery, J. Moore, T. Moore, Morgan, Moss, Neese, B. Newton, W. Newton, Oremus, Pace, Pedalino, Pope, Rankin, Reese, Rivers, Robbins, Rose, Rutherford, Sanders, Schuessler, Scott, Sessions, G.M. Smith, M.M. Smith, Spann-Wilder, Stavrinakis, Taylor, Teeple, Terribile, Vaughan, Waters, Weeks, Wetmore, White, Whitmire, Wickensimer, Williams, Willis, Wooten, Yow
Target Audience:
General Public, Sports Enthusiasts, Education Community
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
January 22, 2026
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Authors:
EKEH Esther Motunrayo, Luqman Ayanlola ATANDA, Cecilia Oyebola OLAFIMIHAN
Affiliations:
Lagos State University; Osun State University
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID:
http://orcid.org/0001-8021-6589
, http:
//orcid.org/0009-0008-2883-9234
Note:
, http
//orcid.org/0009-0003-2766-4691
Type of document:
Academic article
Subject:
ICT integration in secondary school libraries, digital resources, educational technology
Region:
Nigeria
Target audience:
Educators, librarians, academic researchers
Keywords:
ICT Integration, Secondary School libraries, Digital Resources, Educational Technology, Infrastructure challenges, Resource Equity
Information on the entry into force of amended annexes A and B to the Minamata Convention on Mercury
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Geneva
Subject:
Mercury pollution, international environmental agreements
Document Type:
Information note
Organization:
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Author:
UNEP Secretariat
Target Audience:
Parties to the Minamata Convention, stakeholders in international environmental policy
Effective Period:
2025–2027
Approval Date:
25 April 2024
Amendment Date:
19 May 2025
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Document type:
Q&A guidance
Jurisdiction:
Japan
Subject:
Import and shipment of medicines and medical devices
Issuing authority:
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Intended users:
Individuals importing or sending medicines for personal use
Scope:
Prescription medicines, injections, syringes, and medical devices
Import purpose:
Personal use
Regulatory framework:
Pharmaceutical and Medical Device regulations
Application system:
Online Import Confirmation system
Related forms:
Import Confirmation Application Form (Form 12); Explanation of Pharmaceutical Product (Form 13)
Certificate number:
Office use only
Form identifier:
LB1
Document type:
Health certificate
Legislation:
Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007; Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Regulations 2013
Jurisdiction:
Western Australia
Issuing authority:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development
Animal species:
Sheep
Purpose:
Movement of sheep into Western Australia
Consignment scope:
One or more sheep from a property moving to a destination property
Entry inspection points:
Kalgoorlie; Kununurra; Perth Airport; Quarantine facility; Other specified
Parties involved:
Exporting owner or manager; Importing owner or manager; Veterinarian or authorised government inspector
Health conditions covered:
Cattle tick; Footrot; Johne’s disease; Liver fluke
Advance notice requirement:
Copy provided to Entry Inspection Point at least three working days before arrival
Completion requirements:
Parts 1 and 2 completed by specified parties; declarations and signatures required
Source type:
Statutory administrative form establishing health and biosecurity declarations and movement conditions for livestock entering Western Australia.