№ files_lp_4_process_3_127185
File format: docx
Character count: 1146
File size: 60 KB
Sincerely, NRC IRAQ Procurement Department
Country:
Iraq, Erbil
Advertisement date:
23rd April 2024
Submission date:
04th May 2024 at 23:59 Iraq time
Reference number:
RFQ/IQ/24/031
Content:
NRC is currently seeking a reputable, licensed company/individual for QA/QC And HSE Training For the NRC Iraq S&S Team. No margin of preference is applied; the Bid is open to all eligible Bidders.
RFQ Download:
If your company / or individual is interested in participating in the tender, it requires you to download the RFQ package, free of charge, using the following LINK. For registration instructions, please check the Supplier Bid Guide attached to this tender Notice.
Submission details:
This Tender is a Two-Envelope process. NRC Iraq will follow the Two-envelope process for this procurement. Therefore, please submit your quotation following the requirements detailed in the ITB.
Remark:
The Bid, as well as all correspondence and documents relating to the Bid, shall be written in English. Offers must be submitted through the eTB system and before the tender deadline expires. It will not be possible to submit your bid after the deadline or outside the eTB system. For technical questions about the system, please get in touch with [email protected]
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Author:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Target Audience:
National GHG inventory compilers, policy makers, environmental professionals
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Theme:
Climate Change, GHG Inventory
Document type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Author:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Target audience:
National inventory coordinators, environmental experts, GHG inventory teams
Effective period:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Maumee River drainage basin
Theme:
Environmental Data Quality
Document Type:
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidelines
Organization:
WMP
Author:
Ishfaq Rahman
Target Audience:
Data Managers, Environmental Researchers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2025-11-14
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Quality assurance review of RTF work product
Document type:
Review memorandum
Organization / Institution:
EnerNOC
Author:
Dimitry Burdjalov
Target audience:
RTF Staff
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Baghdad
Topic:
Water Infrastructure, Environmental Assessment
Document Type:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report
Organization / Institution:
Baghdad Water Authority
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Stakeholders involved in water infrastructure projects, environmental agencies
Duration:
Project Phase
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Subject:
Immigration and Refugee Status Verification
Document Type:
Guide
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)
Subject:
Political opinion, Human rights, Asylum
Document Type:
Country Policy and Information Note
Organization / institution:
Home Office, Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Home Office decision makers, asylum caseworkers
Period of validity:
Indefinite (for policy guidance)
Approval Date:
25 July 2017
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Baghdad
Topic:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Water Supply, Sewerage
Document Type:
Report
Organization / institution:
World Bank Group
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Public authorities, project stakeholders, environmental experts
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2018-2020
Region / City:
Iraq
Theme:
Sustainable Development Goals, SDG Implementation, National Development Plan
Document Type:
Project Report
Institution:
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Author:
UNDP
Target Audience:
Government officials, development partners, policy makers
Period of Implementation:
August 2018 - December 2020
Approval Date:
July 12, 2018
Date of Changes:
Not provided
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Kurdistan Region of Iraq
Theme:
Domestic Violence, Gender-based Violence
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Amnesty International
Author:
Amnesty International
Target Audience:
General Public, Policymakers, Human Rights Advocates
Period of Action:
2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018-2020
Region / city:
Iraq
Topic:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Government capacity building, Planning and Monitoring
Document type:
Project report
Organization / institution:
UNDP, Ministry of Planning
Author:
UNDP
Target audience:
Government officials, international development organizations, stakeholders in sustainable development
Period of implementation:
August 2018 - December 2020
Approval date:
July 12th, 2018
Date of changes:
None specified
Year:
2019
Region / city:
Iraq
Theme:
Internal relocation, civil documentation, and returns
Document type:
Policy note
Agency:
Home Office
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Home Office decision makers handling protection and human rights claims
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2011
Region / city:
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq
Theme:
Military operations, violence, terrorist attacks, bombings, security forces
Document type:
News report
Organization:
SAMAA, Geo News, Daily Times, The Nation, ISAF, Tolo TV, Afghan Islamic Press, Bulgarian National Radio, AKnews
Author:
Zac Colvin
Target audience:
General public
Period of validity:
February 2011
Date of approval:
February 2011
Date of changes:
Not specified
Country/Location:
Iraq, Sulaymaniyah
Year:
2016-2020
Region / city:
Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan
Thematic focus:
Community development, humanitarian aid, post-conflict recovery
Document type:
Project proposal
Organization:
GHNI
Author:
GHNI team
Target audience:
Humanitarian organizations, NGOs, international aid donors
Action period:
2016–2020
Approval date:
August 2014
Date of amendments:
N/A
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Iraq
Theme:
Road Maintenance, Labour Management
Document Type:
Project Report
Organ / institution:
Ministry of Construction, Housing, Municipalities & Public Works (MoCHMPW)
Author:
Roads and Bridges Directorate (RBD)
Target Audience:
Project stakeholders, international financing institutions
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Al-Shalha Island, South of Iraq
Subject:
Radioactive isotopes, gamma spectroscopy, marine sediments
Document type:
Research article
Organization / institution:
University of Basrah
Author:
Munaf Qasim Albattat, Rana A. Abed, Saba Abbas Kadihm
Target audience:
Researchers, environmental scientists, marine scientists
Date of approval:
2023
Date of changes:
Not specified
Keywords:
Radioactivity, gamma spectroscopy, NORM
Description:
The document provides an analysis of natural radioactive material (NORM) concentrations in sediments from Al-Shalha Island using gamma spectroscopy, comparing results with global averages.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Al-Hussainiya, Karbala Governorate, Iraq
Subject:
Avocado sapling growth and chemical composition
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
Local agricultural nursery
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Agronomists, horticulturists, researchers in tropical fruit cultivation
Experimental Design:
Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) factorial
Treatment Factors:
Humic acid concentrations (0, 3, 5 ml/L), Seaweed extract concentrations (0, 2, 4, 6 ml/L)
Measurement Period:
March–November 2022
Measured Parameters:
Plant height, stem diameter, number of branches, number of leaves, leaf area, leaf carbohydrates, macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca)
Application Method:
Foliar spray
Key Findings:
Combined application of 5 ml/L humic acid and 6 ml/L seaweed extract maximized vegetative growth and leaf nutrient content
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Topic:
Tourism, Technology
Document Type:
Research Paper
Author:
Mohammed Sardar Noori, Dr. Fattah Alizadeh
Target Audience:
Tourists, Researchers, IT Professionals, Policymakers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A