№ files_lp_4_process_2_65179
File format: docx
Character count: 2651
File size: 377 KB
The document provides detailed information on emergency preparedness and alert systems in Clare County, including resources for residents to sign up for alerts and prepare for potential disasters.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Clare County
Theme:
Emergency Management, Disaster Preparedness
Document Type:
Informational Brochure
Organization:
Clare County Emergency Management & Homeland Security Division
Author:
Clare County Emergency Management
Target Audience:
Residents of Clare County, local government agencies, private sector organizations
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Contact Information:
Phone: (989) 539-6161, Email: [email protected]
Communication Methods:
NOAA Weather Radio, RAVE/Smart 911, Local Radio/TV, Facebook, 211 Services
Emergency Alert Locations:
Various sites in Clare County (e.g., City of Clare, City of Harrison, Freeman Township Hall, etc.)
Emergency Preparedness Activities:
Planning for family reunification, backup power, special needs, pet care, emergency go-bags
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization / Institution:
Canberra Health Services
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Miami
Topic:
Lightning safety procedures
Document Type:
Operating Procedure
Organization:
MiamiAlerts
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Miami employees and contractors
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
03/28/2024
Revision Date:
03/25/2024
Date of Issue:
06/11/2020
Year:
2023
Region:
South East London
Organisation:
South East London Integrated Care Board
Document type:
Standard Operating Procedure
Subject:
Quality Alerts management
Approved by:
Themes and Concerns Group
Approval date:
August 2023
Review date:
August 2026
Version:
2.0
Supersedes:
Version 1.2
Originators:
Dean Francis, Quality Support Manager; Diane Goodenough, Quality Manager; Fiona Leacock, Associate Director of Quality
Sponsor:
Paul Larrisey, Director of Quality
Responsible committee:
Themes and Concerns Group
Target audience:
All staff
Scope:
Commissioned health services within South East London Integrated Care System
Monitoring method:
Audit and review of reporting
Monitoring frequency:
Every 3 years
Year:
2017
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Radiology, Patient Safety
Document Type:
National Patient Safety Alert, Audit Report
Organ / Institution:
National Health Service (NHS)
Author:
Dr A L Chang
Target Audience:
Radiologists, Clinical Directors, Healthcare Professionals
Effective Period:
2017
Approval Date:
Saturday 20 May 2017
Last Reviewed Date:
Saturday 13 May 2017
Suggested Action:
Re-audit in 6 months post local education and changes
Resources:
IT facilities, clerical time
Description:
This document presents an audit of communication practices for fail-safe alerts in radiology, focusing on critical and unexpected findings, and provides recommendations for improvement.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Western New York
Topic:
Emergency Alerts, Hospital Safety
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization:
WNY Hospitals
Audience:
Hospital staff, healthcare providers
Action Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 1, 2017
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Healthcare software, Patient management
Document type:
User guide
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Dawn Stephens
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals using PARIS
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
22/03/2022
Year:
2008
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Medical software, Laboratory Information Systems
Document Type:
User Manual
Organization / Institution:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Information and Technology (OI&T)
Author:
REDACTED
Target Audience:
VA Medical Center laboratory staff
Period of Validity:
August 2008 – August 2014
Approval Date:
August 2014
Date of Changes:
August 2014
Year:
2017
Region / city:
England
Topic:
Acute kidney injury, pharmacoepidemiology, electronic health records
Document type:
Research study
Institution:
UK Renal Registry, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Leicester, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Author:
Manuela Savino, Lucy Plumb, Anna Casula, Katharine Evans, Esther Wong, Nitin Kolhe, James F. Medcalf, Dorothea Nitsch
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, pharmacoepidemiologists
Period of validity:
2017
Approval date:
N/A
Amendment date:
N/A
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Austin, TX
Topic:
Azure Logic Apps, Email Feedback, Cognitive Services, Twilio, Cloud Integration
Document Type:
Technical Lab Guide
Organization / Institution:
Global Azure Bootcamp
Author:
Stephen W. Thomas
Target Audience:
Azure professionals, cloud developers, integration architects
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
2018
Date of changes:
April 17, 2018
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Healthcare, Clinical Informatics, Patient Safety
Document Type:
Supplementary Table
Institution / Organization:
Research Study on Clinical Decision Support
Authors:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Clinicians, Healthcare Researchers
Clinical Setting:
Intensive Care Units, Post-operative Care
Data Collection Period:
Not specified
Key Variables:
Workflow fit, Usability, Patient Impact, Technological Impact, Clinician Interaction
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
Interpreter Services, Sign Language, Government Agencies
Document Type:
Manual, Agreement
Organization:
Virginia Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Target Audience:
Qualified Sign Language Interpreters, State and Local Government Agencies
Effective Date:
January 1, 2020
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2020
Date of Last Update:
January 1, 2020
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Burlington
Subject:
Signage Regulations
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Institution:
Burlington City Government
Target Audience:
Property owners, contractors, and individuals applying for sign permits
Program name:
Ashland Sign & Façade Program
Document type:
Application form
Grant type:
Reimbursement grant
Administering organization:
Town of Ashland
Administering program:
Ashland Economic Development Incentive Program
Location:
Ashland, Massachusetts
Eligible applicants:
Businesses located in Ashland
Eligible improvements:
Exterior façade and sign improvements
Maximum funding amount:
Up to 50% of project cost or $5,000
Funding source:
Town funding
Approval authority:
Ashland Economic Development Advisory Group; Town Manager; Board of Selectmen
Submission requirements:
Completed application, bids, permits, supporting documents
Contact person:
Economic Development Director
Contact address:
101 Main Street, Ashland, MA 01721
Contact email:
[email protected]
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Indiana
Subject:
World Languages
Document Type:
Academic Standards
Institution:
Indiana Department of Education
Author:
Indiana Department of Education
Target Audience:
Teachers, School Administrators, Curriculum Planners
Period of Application:
Kindergarten to Grade 12
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
2019
Year:
2016
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Traffic Sign Illumination Research
Document Type:
Invitation to Tender
Organization:
Transport for London (TfL)
Author:
Transport for London (TfL)
Target Audience:
Research firms, Tenderers
Period of Activity:
February 2016
Approval Date:
February 2016
Modification Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
Beykent University
Target audience:
Students of Beykent University
Description:
Guide for signing up for Zoom and joining an exam class for the ERASMUS+ SPEAKING EXAM at Beykent University.
Note:
Year