№ lp_1_2_16713
File format: docx
Character count: 59770
File size: 856 KB
The document is a checklist used for submitting a degree proposal at California State University, detailing the requirements for program approval, including faculty, financial, and academic criteria.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Academic Program Proposal
Document Type:
Checklist
Institution:
California State University
Author:
CSU Faculty
Target Audience:
University administrators, faculty, program proposers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
October 2017
Date of Amendments:
October 2017
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Location:
Mojave, California
Theme:
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) competition
Document Type:
Competition Rules
Organizing Body:
California State University – Los Angeles, Mojave Air & Space Port at Rutan Field
Author:
Michael Thorburn
Target Audience:
Students, Universities, and Colleges
Period of Activity:
June 7, 2025
Approval Date:
2024-08-11
Revision Date:
2024-08-11
Year:
2014-2015
Region / City:
California
Subject:
General Education
Document Type:
Certificate Program Description
Institution:
California State University (CSU)
Author:
California State University
Target Audience:
Prospective CSU students
Effective Period:
Upon completion of program requirements
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A certificate program designed for students planning to transfer to the California State University (CSU) system, meeting lower division general education requirements.
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Training transcripts and certificates
Document Type:
User guide
Institution:
CSU Learn
Target Audience:
Users of CSU Learn
Effective Period:
Spring 2019
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Mojave, California
Topic:
Uncrewed Aerial System Competition
Document Type:
Competition Rules
Organization:
California State University – Los Angeles, Mojave Air & Space Port at Rutan Field
Author:
Michael Thorburn
Target Audience:
University, college, and community college students
Effective Period:
June 7, 2025
Approval Date:
2025-01-20
Modification Date:
2025-01-20
Program:
Nutrition and Dietetics, A.S.-T
Degree Type:
Associate in Science for Transfer
Transfer Institution:
California State University (CSU)
GE Pattern:
Option B
Total Units:
66
Minimum Transfer Requirements:
60 CSU or UC transferable semester units
Minimum GPA:
2.0 overall
Recommended Duration:
2 years
Recommended Course Load:
15 units per semester (30 units per year)
Core Subjects:
Nutrition Science, Human Anatomy and Physiology, General Biology, General Chemistry, Microbiology, Psychology
Additional Requirement:
CHEM 100 or 1 year of high school chemistry
Career Fields:
Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition Consulting, Diet Technician
Required Education for Careers:
Some college (SM), Bachelor’s (B), Master’s (M)
Financial Aid Basis:
Number of credit hours per semester
Work Experience Option:
Special project or internship for credit
Year:
2007
Region / City:
CSU
Theme:
Information Technology, Student Records
Document Type:
Business Process Guide
Organization / Institution:
California State University (CSU)
Author:
Mary Chouinard, Amy Braceros, ACBI D. Selva, Melissa Cobb, D Selva
Target Audience:
CSU Staff, Students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
07/23/18
Date of Changes:
02/19/18
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Christian Service University
Theme:
Student Elections
Document Type:
Election Report
Organization / Institution:
Christian Service University
Author:
Anastasia C. Afenu
Target Audience:
CSU Students
Period of Validity:
2024/2025 Academic Year
Date of Approval:
April 2024
Date of Changes:
None
Contextual Description:
A report on the 2024/2025 Student Representative Council elections at Christian Service University, detailing the election process, outcomes, and the newly elected leadership.
Year:
2006
Region / City:
California, USA
Theme:
Social Work, Student Organization
Document Type:
Constitution and Bylaws
Organization / Institution:
CSU Dominguez Hills
Author:
Graduate Association of Social Work
Target Audience:
Graduate students in social work, MSW program students, university community
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
December 21, 2006
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Institution:
Kent State University, Cleveland State University College of Law
Program:
Bachelor of Science in Fashion Merchandising / Juris Doctor (JD) 3+3
Credit Hours Required:
Minimum 120 total, 39 upper-division
Degree Pathway:
3+3 Dual Degree (Undergraduate + Law)
Coursework:
Undergraduate major, minor, experiential learning, study away, writing intensive
Transfer Credits:
Minimum 30 credit hours from CSU Law JD
Admission Requirements:
LSAT, 3+3 Program Interest Form, Credential Assembly Service (CAS) Report
Academic Advisors:
Kent State University, CSU Law
GPA Requirements:
Minimum 2.500 major GPA, minimum 2.500 cumulative GPA
Contact Information:
[email protected], [email protected]
Program Updates:
December 2025
Year:
2019
Region / City:
California, United States
Subject:
Higher Education Admission Policy
Document Type:
Regulatory Notice
Organization / Institution:
Board of Trustees of the California State University
Author:
Marquita Grenot-Scheyer
Target Audience:
High school students, educators, and the public
Effective Period:
2026 onward
Hearing Date:
November 19, 2019
Regulatory Authority:
Sections 89030 and 89030.1 of the California Education Code
References:
Section 89030 of the California Education Code
Contact:
Marquita Grenot-Scheyer, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Educator Preparation and Public School Programs, Office of the Chancellor, California State University, 401 Golden Shore, Long Beach, California 90802-4210, phone 562-951-4765
Access:
Full text and supporting information available at http://www.calstate.edu/Title5/index.shtml
Year:
2023
Academic Term:
Fall 2023
Institution:
CSU
Course Code:
CSU 1000
Document Type:
Course Schedule / Class Calendar
Subject Area:
First-Year College Experience and Academic Success
Topics Covered:
college adjustment, learning styles, time management, study strategies, advising and registration, career exploration, financial literacy, mental health and stress management
Course Activities:
discussion posts, quizzes, writing assignments, assessments, guest presentations, small group presentations
Assessment Tools Mentioned:
Qualtrics Pre-Course Assessment, LASSI Inventory, Focus2 Assessment, Post-Course Assessment in Qualtrics
Related Campus Services:
Center for Academic Success, Career Services and Experiential Learning, Counseling & Psychological Services, Library
Academic Break:
Fall Break (October 9–10)
Final Assessment Period:
December 4–11
Note:
Calendar subject to change with revisions communicated through weekly CSU account email updates
Year:
2026
Institution:
California State University, Fullerton
Course:
Physics 225
Document Type:
Laboratory Report
Topic:
Physical Pendulum
Author:
Student (unspecified)
Target Audience:
Undergraduate physics students
Experiment Date:
Spring 2026
Equipment:
Pendulum rod, masses, protractor, stopwatch
Measurements Included:
Masses, lengths, angles, calculated and measured periods, percent error
Sections:
Procedure, Data Tables, Analysis Questions, Conclusion
Data Analysis Tools:
Excel or graphical analysis
Year:
2021
Institution:
Colorado State University
Partner Institution:
Colorado School of Public Health
Program Type:
Dual Degree (BS/MPH)
Target Audience:
Current CSU undergraduate students
Deadline:
March 1, 2021, 11:59pm MST
Application Requirements:
Completed form, unofficial transcript, resume/CV, personal statement, 3 letters of recommendation
Contact Persons:
Lily Doniger (administrative assistant), Kendra Bigsby (assistant director)
Eligible Students:
CSU undergraduates planning to graduate May 2022 or later
WRGP Eligibility:
Residents of AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, ND, OR, SD, UT, WA, WY
Optional Data:
Pronouns, racial categories, citizenship status
Document Type:
Application Form
Period:
Fall 2021 admission
Year:
2026
Institution:
California State University (CSU)
Document Type:
FAQ / Guidance Document
Target Audience:
CSU Faculty and Course Instructors
Course Type:
Fully online asynchronous General Education and high-demand lower division major courses
Requirements:
Quality Matters (QM) or equivalent training, course articulation across at least five CSU campuses, minimum DFW data or historical success evidence
Application Period:
Ongoing per semester
Seats Reserved:
10 seats for CourseMatch students per course
Course Approval Duration:
Semester-based, requires reapproval each term
Data Sources:
Canvas gradebook, previous FTF or online course records
Relevant Links:
https://www.csus.edu/information-resources-technology/ati/instructional-materials.html
Note:
Year
Theme:
Child development, Early Years Education
Document type:
Progress Check
Target audience:
Parents, caregivers, childcare providers
Contextual description:
A progress check document assessing the developmental milestones of a child at age two, focusing on key areas such as communication, physical, social, and emotional development, completed by the childcare provider.
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Wisconsin
Topic:
Background Check Consent
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Wisconsin Department of Administration
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Administration
Target Audience:
Job applicants in Wisconsin
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
European Space Agency
Topic:
Space Technology, Business Incubation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
European Space Agency Business Incubation Centres (ESA BICs)
Author:
European Space Agency
Target Audience:
Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, ESA BIC Applicants
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
23/06/2020
Modification Date:
30/09/2022
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Residential care worker documentation and information sharing
Document type:
Form
Agency/Institution:
Office of the Children’s Guardian
Author:
Office of the Children’s Guardian
Target Audience:
Residential care agencies and workers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified