№ files_lp_3_process_7_037662
File format: docx
Character count: 2309
File size: 27 KB
Note:
Year
Subject:
Education
Document Type:
Educational Standards
Target Audience:
Teacher trainees
Contextual description:
Educational document outlining the required competencies in English and mathematics for teacher trainees.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Author:
RP&C Inspector
Approving authority:
RP&C Professional Lead
Organisation:
Office for Nuclear Regulation
Document type:
Technical assessment guide
Issue number:
8
Publication date:
April 2023
Next major review date:
April 2028
Document reference:
NS-TAST-GD-004
Record reference number:
2023/16035
Subject area:
Nuclear safety assessment
Regulatory framework:
UK nuclear safety legislation and regulations
Applicable principles:
ONR Safety Assessment Principles FP.1–FP.8
Intended audience:
ONR inspectors and safety assessors
Geographical scope:
United Kingdom
Revision history:
Minor updates to references, alignment with REPPIR 2019, formatting changes
Note:
Date
Region / City:
Okazaki, Japan
Theme:
Recommendation for academic position
Document Type:
Recommendation letter, Curriculum Vitae
Institution:
National Institute for Physiological Sciences
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Academic hiring committee, research professionals
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023-2032
Region / City:
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Topic:
Nucleation processes in materials science
Document Type:
White Paper
Organization / Institution:
Washington University in St. Louis, Pennsylvania State University, Tufts University, University of Florida, University Space Research Association, NASA GRC
Author:
Kenneth F. Kelton, Richard Axelbaum, Katherine Flores, Anup Gangopadhyay, John C. Mauro, Douglas Matson, Ranga Narayanan, Suman Sinha-Ray, Peter W. Vorhees, Richard Weber, Stephen Wilke
Target Audience:
Researchers, scientists in materials science and space exploration
Period of Validity:
2023-2032
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Not specified
Subject:
Consciousness, Quantum Physics, Metaphysics
Document type:
Academic Paper
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Julian Michels, S. Orai
Target audience:
Researchers in physics, philosophy, and consciousness studies
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
This paper compares two theories proposing consciousness as the primary structuring principle of reality:
one grounded in metaphysics (CSFT) and the other in quantum physics (QPC), showing their potential complementarity.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
European Union
Topic:
Fundamental Rights, EU Funding
Document Type:
Annual Report
Organ / institution:
European Commission
Author:
European Commission
Target audience:
EU policymakers, civil society organizations, human rights defenders, national authorities
Period of validity:
2024
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Contextual description:
Annual report providing an overview of the funding mechanisms for promoting and enforcing fundamental rights within the EU.
Issuing body:
Governor’s Crime Commission
Region:
North Carolina
Country:
United States
Subject:
Standards for domestic violence and sexual assault victim services
Document type:
Service standards and compliance requirements
Applicable programs:
Domestic violence and sexual assault programs seeking Basic Services Funding
Related legislation:
NC General Statutes; Victims of Crime Act (VOCA)
Core services defined:
Crisis Services and Telephone Hotlines; Legal and Court Advocacy; Medical and Emergency Room Advocacy; Individual Counseling; Support Group Services; Shelter Services
Requirements addressed:
Confidentiality; Accessibility; Cultural competence; Training; Community outreach; Fees policy
Funding condition:
Compliance required for eligibility for Basic Services Funding
Year:
2021
Region / city:
European Union
Theme:
Legal theory, European Union law
Document type:
Academic paper
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
Christoph Gärner
Target audience:
Scholars, legal professionals, students of EU law
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Year:
2024
Region / City:
New York
Subject:
Data Structures and Algorithms
Document Type:
Course Description
Institution:
The Cooper Union
Instructor:
Prof. Carl Sable
Target Audience:
Students enrolled in ECE 264
Period of Application:
Fall 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Hull
Subject:
Sediment transport, coastal dynamics
Document type:
Report
Organization:
University of Hull
Author:
Stuart McLelland
Target audience:
Researchers in sediment transport and coastal environments
Period of validity:
2013-2014
Approval date:
20/09/2014
Changes date:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Procurement
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Public bodies and organizations involved in procurement
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Context:
Guidelines for ensuring compliance with the TFEU fundamental principles in procurement activities, emphasizing transparency, equal treatment, and non-discrimination across all cross-border procurement processes.
Note:
Year
Context:
This document outlines basic concepts in chemistry, particularly related to states of matter, solvents, and exposure risks in various environments.
Document symbol:
A/HRC/31/65
Session:
Thirty-first session of the Human Rights Council
Agenda item:
3 – Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development
Author:
Ben Emmerson
Mandate:
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism
Submitting body:
Secretariat of the Human Rights Council
Date:
22 February 2016
Language:
English
Type of document:
Thematic report
Reporting period:
June to December 2015 (activities section)
Related resolutions:
22/8 and 29/9
Related documents:
A/HRC/29/51; A/70/371
Subject:
Human rights in the context of preventing and countering violent extremism
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Switzerland
Topic:
Clinical research, human research projects
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Author:
Education Platform of the Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation (SCTO)
Target Audience:
Clinical research professionals, project leaders, and researchers
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Update:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Education, Healthcare
Document Type:
Guideline
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Healthcare educators, trainers, facilitators
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
MDS 2023 Updates, Training Plan Design
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Author:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Target Audience:
Healthcare facilities, staff involved in resident care
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Competency assessment, audit, Corporations Act
Document type:
Logbook, guidance
Target audience:
Applicants for RCA registration, assessors
Period of validity:
3–5 years