№ files_lp_3_process_7_105223
File format: docx
Character count: 7833
File size: 19 KB
This document is an academic article analyzing the impact of humanism on music during the Renaissance, particularly its effects on sacred music, opera, and musical practices in Europe.
Year:
16th century
Region / City:
Europe
Topic:
History of music, Humanism
Document type:
Academic article
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Scholars, music historians
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Cytokinin and auxin profiles in somatic embryos
Document Type:
Research Study
Organization / Institution:
NEIKER
Author:
Moncaleán P., García-Mendiguren O., Novák O., Strand M., Goicoa T., Ugarte M.D., Montalbán I.A.
Target Audience:
Researchers in plant biology and forestry
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Subject:
Chemistry, Catalysts, Materials Science
Document type:
Research paper
Institution / organization:
Not specified
Author:
Mark A. Newton, R. Nicholls, J. B. Brazier, B. N. Nguyen, C. J. Mulligan, K. Hellgardt, E. Barreiro, Hermann Emerich, King Kuok Hii, I. Snigireva, P. B. J. Thompson
Target audience:
Researchers, Chemists, Material Scientists
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Plasma conditions, Mercury calibration lamps
Document Type:
Technical Note
Organization / Institution:
LightMachinery
Contextual Description:
A technical note analyzing the variations in plasma emission from mercury lamps used for calibrating spectrometers from different manufacturers.
Journal:
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology
Manuscript Type:
Original Article
Study Design:
Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors:
Hyun Ah Chung; Sun-Young Lee; Hee Won Moon; Jeong Hwan Kim; In-Kyung Sung; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim; Hye Seung Han
Affiliations:
Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, South Korea
Corresponding Author:
Sun-Young Lee, MD, PhD
Country:
South Korea
Funding:
Supported by Konkuk University in 2015 (No. KU2015-A019-0270)
Institutional Review Board Approval:
Konkuk University School of Medicine (KUH1010625)
Clinical Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: KCT0001302
Received:
December 27, 2015
Accepted:
July 11, 2016
Publication Year:
2016
Keywords:
Antibody; Helicobacter pylori; Hepatitis B; Immunoglobulin G; Pepsinogen
License:
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Salem, Massachusetts
Topic:
Mental Health Stigma, College Students
Document Type:
Academic Thesis
Institution:
Salem State University
Author:
Colleen Campbell
Target Audience:
Academics, Researchers, Mental Health Professionals
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
North Carolina
Subject:
Prenatal SSRIs, Infant Development, Negative Affect
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Author:
Gabrielle Adams
Target Audience:
Researchers, Medical Professionals
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
This site gives you a list of the top 50 think tanks. It’s a good place to start. I like to consult the University of Pennsylvania’s “Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program.” They provide de:
//www.brookings.edu/
Brookings Institute is usually ranked as the #1 think tank in the U.S. and as one of the five think tanks with the greatest global influence, often ranked #1 in that category as well. Brookin:
//www.heritage.org/
Heritage Foundation focuses on public policy “based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.” :
//www.cato.org/mission
Cato Institute focuses on public policy, and its aim is “…to originate, disseminate and increase understanding of public policies based on principles of individual liberty, limited government:
//www.hrw.org/
Note:
Human Rights Watch focuses on civil liberties and human rights worldwide. Their work is truly global in scale and they bring scholarship to bear on every aspect of human rights. Today, for example, they offer commentary on worker safety in the U.S., how the jewelry industry fuels human rights violations, Trumps actions and comments since the election, the effects of US “remain in Mexico” policy on children and families, infringements on journalism in China, rebel violence in Central African Republic, and the inequalities in availability of COVID-19 vaccines. Perspective – traditional liberalism; global www.csis.org
The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) focuses on international affairs. Its daily brief The Evening is great going to bed reading – not in the sense of “it’s boring,” but in:
“CSIS’s purpose is to define the future of national security. We are guided by a distinct set of values – non-partisanship [they mean that], independent thought, innovative thinking, cross-disciplinary scholarship, integrity and professionalism, and talent development.” A modest agenda. Their definition of national security is well beyond “military strategy” and includes issues like global health, climate change, and human rights and the have programs with a regional focus as well. They DO have a strong focus on defense strategy. It is the overarching concern within which climate change, food security, poverty, and the African program are critical issues. Perspectives – traditional conservatism, US but with a strong global focus as well. www.jointcenter.org
The Black Institute is an action oriented think tank that is “… a Black-led policy and organizing institution dedicated to solving local problems and addressing the concerns of Black families:
education, economic fairness, environmental justice, and immigration reform. You have to click on the menu button (upper right of banner) and ten on research and publications to see the full range of issues TBI addresses. These are well-developed and documented policy pieces with a strong focus on community. Perspective – independent, national (but includes immigration) https://aipi.asu.edu/
Year:
2011
Region / City:
Southern California
Topic:
Public zoos, animal conservation, education
Document type:
Article, Radio discussion
Institution:
KPCC, BBC News
Author:
Cambria Webb, Thomas Dixon, David Hancocks, David Lasseres
Target audience:
General public, educators, animal conservationists
Period of action:
2011
Date of approval:
October 2011
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Religion, Afterlife
Document Type:
Educational Material
Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Students, General Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / city:
N/A
Topic:
Psychological health, affect variability
Document Type:
Research article
Institution:
Emotion Journal
Author:
Multiple authors
Target Audience:
Researchers, psychologists
Period of validity:
N/A
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region:
United States
Topic:
Personal finance, estate planning
Document type:
Article
Organization:
Edward Jones
Author:
Edward Jones
Target audience:
Individual investors and account holders
Publication date:
March 9, 2026
Keywords:
beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, life insurance, estate planning, probate, trusts
Year:
2002
Region / City:
North America
Subject:
Visual literacy, education, political cartoons
Document type:
Research paper, educational article
Organization / Institution:
Educational psychology review
Author:
Carney, R. N., Levin, J. R.
Target audience:
Educators, students, researchers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Contextual description:
Research paper discussing the role of comic strips and political cartoons as educational tools in promoting visual literacy and engaging students in learning.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
USA
Theme:
Nutrition, Health Education
Document Type:
Educational Lesson Plan
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
High School Students
Effective Period:
Current School Year
Approval Date:
Not Specified
Last Modified:
Not Specified
Contextual description:
Educational lesson plan on nutrition and health influences, including family, school, technology, and personal health choices.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Ecology, Plant-Animal Interactions
Document Type:
Scientific Supplementary Information
Institution / Organization:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, Ecologists, Biologists
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2019-2020
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Topic:
Education, Curriculum, Student Achievement
Document Type:
Research Study
Institution:
Washington, D.C. Public Schools
Author:
Shanice Smith, Elementary School Teacher
Target Audience:
Educators, Policymakers
Period of Action:
2019-2020
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Version:
1.1
Review date:
12/04/2024
Edited by:
CW
Approved by:
CW
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Mandalay
Topic:
Healthcare, Patient Management
Document type:
Policy
Organ / institution:
Mandalay Medical Centre
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Employees of the organisation, including agency workers, locums, and contractors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2009
Region / city:
Western Europe
Topic:
Electoral Systems, Proportional Representation, Political Parties
Document Type:
Academic Paper
Institution:
Stanford University
Author:
Jonathan Rodden
Target Audience:
Political Scientists, Academics
Period of Effect:
Late 19th to Early 20th Century
Approval Date:
2009
Date of Revisions:
December 30, 2009
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chernobyl, Former Soviet Union
Subject:
Military Technology, Environmental Modification, Nuclear Disaster
Document Type:
Documentary, Report
Institution:
Kla.TV
Author:
Werner Altnickel
Target Audience:
General Public, Scholars of History and Military Technology
Period of Action:
1986, 1997, 2002
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified