№ lp_2_3_66729
File format: docx
Character count: 4074
File size: 23 KB
The document provides detailed criteria for calculating academic and research scores for university and college teachers based on UGC guidelines.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Academic/Research Score Calculation
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
UGC (University Grants Commission)
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
University and College Teachers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
18th July 2018
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2019-20
Region / City:
New Delhi
Topic:
Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) for Teaching Faculties
Document Type:
Guidelines / Regulation
Organization / Institution:
Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan
Author:
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)
Target Audience:
Teaching Faculties, Administrative Staff
Period of Validity:
2019-20
Approval Date:
18/07/2018
Date of Amendments:
2018
Note:
Description
Institution:
TKM College of Engineering, Kollam
Organ / Unit:
IQAC (Internal Quality Assurance Cell)
Responsibility:
DQAC – Quality assurance wing
Reporting:
IQAC through Head of the Department
Type of document:
Faculty feedback form
Thematic focus:
Curriculum, Course Content, Teaching-Learning, Evaluation, Administration and Welfare
Target audience:
Faculty members
Survey frequency:
End of all semester
Programme scope:
Programme of Studies / Institution
Sections:
Part A and Part B
Evaluation method:
Structured questionnaire with Likert scale responses
Institution:
R B S College, Agra
Affiliated University:
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra
Issuing Body:
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)
Document Type:
Student Feedback Form
Academic Year:
Not specified
Semester:
Not specified
Date of Feedback:
Not specified
Subject Area:
Course Evaluation and Institutional Facilities
Evaluation Criteria:
Course Content, Teaching Effectiveness, Curriculum, Laboratory Facilities, Library Facility, Internet Facility, Co-Curricular Activities
Rating Scale:
5-Excellent, 4-Very Good, 3-Good, 2-Average, 1-Below Average
Submission Method:
Email or Postal Submission
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Postal Address:
Coordinator, Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC), R B S College, Agra-282004
Student Details Included:
Name and Signature (Optional), Attendance Percentage, CGPA Percentage
Year:
2012-2013
Institution:
Govt. of Goa, College of Arts, Science & Commerce, Quepem-Goa
Type of Document:
Report
Purpose:
Quality Assurance
Accreditation Status:
NAAC B+ (1st Cycle)
IQAC Coordinator:
Dr. Shirish Kamat
Academic Year:
2012-2013
Status of IQAC:
Active
IQAC Established:
2003
Date of Submission:
04/01/2016
Relevant Dates:
2012-2013 Academic Year
Themes of Seminars:
Adolescence Crisis, Teachers as Councelors, Careers Workshop
University Affiliation:
Goa University
Funding Received from UGC:
Yes
Location:
Quepem-Goa
Institution Type:
Government College
Faculty:
Arts, Science, Commerce
Contact Info:
[email protected], Tel: 0832-2662342, Mobile: 9822586616
Year:
2013-2014
Region / City:
Goa, India
Theme:
Quality Assurance, Academic Progress
Document Type:
Report
Institution / Organization:
Govt. of Goa, College of Arts, Science & Commerce, Quepem-Goa
Author:
IQAC
Target Audience:
Faculty, Students, Management, Accreditation Bodies
Period of Validity:
Academic Year 2013-2014
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Theme:
Animal Welfare, Research Protocol
Document Type:
Research Guidance
Institution:
Australian National University (ANU)
Author:
ANU Veterinary Services
Target Audience:
Researchers, Animal Technicians, Veterinary Staff
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Regulatory framework:
UGC Regulations, 2018
Document type:
Annexure / Appendix table
Appendix reference:
Annexure-II, Appendix II, Table-2
Issuing body:
University Grants Commission
Country:
India
Purpose:
Assessment of academic and research performance of teachers
Assessment basis:
Documentary evidence submitted by the teacher
Covered activities:
Research publications, books, ICT-based pedagogy, MOOCs, research guidance, projects, consultancy, patents, policy documents, awards, invited lectures
Target group:
University and college teachers
Scoring authority:
University
Verification authority:
University
Note:
Year
Author:
Edward James Martin, Fredrick Arthur, Harry Jonathan
Keywords:
Text classification; Semantic Web with weighted idf feature; Expanded query; Fuzzy Semantic Web; Fuzzy Ranking Algorithm.
Contextual description:
Research paper focusing on enhancing the ranking algorithm of the Semantic Web by integrating fuzziness and weighted scores in the context of web search and metadata storage.
Year:
2024/2025
Region/City:
Minneapolis/Hennepin County
Theme:
Homelessness, Housing Stability
Document Type:
Procedural Guide
Organization/Institution:
Hennepin County/Minneapolis Continuum of Care
Author:
CoC Funding Committee
Target Audience:
Community stakeholders, housing organizations, and homeless service providers
Effective Period:
FY2024/2025
Approval Date:
June 20, 2024
Amendment Date:
May 16, 2024
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Access keys, staff management, MDS evaluations
Document type:
Guideline
Organization:
Riverside Insights
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Staff involved in MDS evaluations
Period of validity:
Through December 31, 2027
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Animal Welfare, Research Protocol
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization:
Australian National University
Author:
ANU Veterinary Services
Target Audience:
Researchers, Animal Technicians, Veterinary Staff
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
Guidelines for assessing the health and welfare of older mice in research using a standardized scoring system in line with ethical protocols.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Animal welfare, Pain assessment
Document type:
Template, Guidance
Institution:
ANU
Target audience:
Researchers, animal technicians, veterinary staff
Contextual description:
Guide for researchers to assess mouse health and welfare through a scoring system based on visible indicators of pain, distress, and overall condition.
Version:
V2.0
Institution:
Australian National University
Document type:
Animal welfare guidance
Species:
Mouse
Procedure:
Oral gavage
Assessment system:
Mouse Score System with Mouse Grimace Scale
Monitoring period:
Seven days post oral gavage
Scoring range:
0–3
Humane endpoints:
Defined by score criteria
Approval authority:
Animal Ethics Committee
Veterinary contact:
ANU Veterinary Services
Record keeping:
Cage card and relevant database
Interventions:
Supportive therapies and euthanasia criteria
Note:
Risk Assessment of Blood Glucose Meter Use and Related Safety Protocols
Year:
2021
Region / City:
RUH
Topic:
Blood Glucose Meter Safety Protocols
Document Type:
Standard Operating Procedure
Organization:
RUH
Author:
N. Hodges
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals involved in point-of-care testing
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
21/10/21
Amendment Date:
None
Year:
2019
Region / City:
South Africa
Subject:
Regulatory documentation for pharmaceutical registration
Document type:
Regulatory submission
Authority/Organization:
SAHPRA (South African Health Products Regulatory Authority)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Pharmaceutical manufacturers, regulatory affairs professionals
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
2019/01/31
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Stroke risk assessment in Atrial Fibrillation patients
Document Type:
Research Supplementary File
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, researchers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Air Emission Profiles, SPECIATE Database
Document Type:
Evaluation Framework / Methodology
Organization:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Authors:
C.D. Bray, M. Strum, H. Simon, L. Riddick, M. Kosusko, M. Menetrez, M.D. Hays, V. Rao
Target Audience:
Environmental researchers, data reviewers
Reference:
Atmospheric Environment 207, 93-104, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.013
Evaluation Criteria:
Data from measurements, Data from other methods, Sampling design, Measurement methodologies, Data reduction/statistics, Speciation completeness
Scoring System:
QSCORE 0–30 (Measurements), QSCORE 0–29 (Other Methods)
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Genomics, Genetics
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
Rutgers University, NIH
Author:
Matteo Di Vincenzo, Thanavadee Prachason, Gaia Sampogna, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao Danae Lin, Lotta-Katrin Pries, Jim van Os, Bart P.F. Rutten, Ran Barzilay, Andrea Fiorillo, Sinan Guloksuz
Target Audience:
Researchers, Geneticists, Biologists
Period of Activity:
2023
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Document type:
Supplementary material
Subject:
CT radiomics analysis of ground-glass nodules (GGNs)
Imaging modality:
Computed tomography (CT)
Slice thickness:
3 mm; 1 mm
Study groups:
Benign GGNs (n = 23); Malignant GGNs (n = 92); Adenocarcinoma group (n = 92; n = 54 for 1 mm CT)
Statistical methods:
Propensity score matching; Logistic regression model; LASSO algorithm; 10-fold cross-validation; ROC analysis; Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Matching ratio:
1:4
C-statistic:
0.7261
Matching method:
Greed matching within specified caliper distances
Distance metric:
0.7
Use of replacement:
With replacement
Feature categories:
Conventional indices; First order features; Second order features (GLCM, GLRLM, NGLDM, GLZLM)
Outcome measures:
AUC value; Rad-score; P-values for texture feature comparison
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Europe
Subject:
Stroke risk stratification, Atrial fibrillation
Document type:
Survey
Organization / institution:
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Author:
Juqian Zhang, Radoslaw Lenarczyk, Francisco Marin, Katarzyna Malaczynska-Rajpold, Jedrzej Kosiuk, Wolfram Dohner, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Geraldine Lee, Jeroen M Hendriks, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Tatjana S. Potpara
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals (cardiologists, electrophysiologists, nurses, pharmacists)
Effective period:
2020
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of revisions:
Not specified