№ files_lp_3_process_7_036889
File format: docx
Character count: 4855
File size: 13 KB
This resolution calls for coordinated global efforts to combat the resurgence of measles through strengthening immunization programs and establishing new health initiatives worldwide.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Immunization, Measles
Document Type:
Resolution
Organization / Institution:
World Health Assembly
Target Audience:
Governments, Public Health Officials
Action Period:
2025–2030
Approval Date:
2025
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
1980-2000
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Political History, Conservative Movement
Document Type:
Educational Worksheet / Study Guide
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students of U.S. History
Topics Covered:
Reagan Era, Bush 41, Clinton Administration, End of Cold War, Domestic and Foreign Policies
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Nigeria
Topic:
Contemporary Art, Sculpture
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Art scholars, students, cultural researchers
Methodology:
Fieldwork, artist interviews, exhibition observation
Key Concepts:
Terracotta, Postcolonial Theory, Material Culture, Indigenous Materials
Period Covered:
Nok civilization to contemporary practices
Publication Date:
2025
Research Focus:
Revival of terracotta, cultural reappropriation, environmental commentary, decolonial practice
Note:
Year
Topic:
Measles testing, PCR and serology
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization / Institution:
Public Health Ontario
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, laboratory staff
Year:
2024
Region/City:
Healthcare settings
Theme:
Measles risk assessment, infection control
Document Type:
Risk assessment guidelines
Organization/Institution:
Healthcare Safety Executive (HSE)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Healthcare organizations, employers, practitioners
Period of validity:
Ongoing, requires regular review
Approval Date:
19 March 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
1968
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Vaccination, Measles, Immunology
Document Type:
Educational Text
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students, Health professionals
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Measles Awareness
Document Type:
Public Service Announcement
Organization:
Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDH&E)
Target Audience:
General public, especially those unvaccinated or at risk
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / city:
England
Topic:
Vaccination
Document type:
Patient Group Direction (PGD)
Organization:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Author:
Christina Wilson, Dr Vanessa Saliba, David Green
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners
Validity period:
20 January 2026 – 30 November 2028
Approval date:
20 January 2026
Review date:
31 May 2028
Expiry date:
30 November 2028
Note:
Change history
Year:
2025
Region / city:
England
Topic:
Vaccination
Document type:
Patient Group Direction (PGD)
Issuing organization:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Author:
Christina Wilson, Dr. Vanessa Saliba, David Green
Target audience:
Healthcare practitioners authorized to administer vaccines
Valid from:
1 January 2026
Review date:
31 May 2028
Expiry date:
30 November 2028
Version:
7.0
Date of approval:
19 December 2025
Amendments:
Last amendment on 19 December 2025
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Measles detection
Document type:
Protocol
Organization / institution:
EuroImmun
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Laboratory personnel, medical researchers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Date
Topic:
Healthcare exposure, measles
Document Type:
Notification letter
Organization / Institution:
[Healthcare Facility]
Author:
[Health Officer Name]
Target Audience:
Patients, healthcare workers, pregnant women, individuals with compromised immunity
Context:
A template letter informing individuals of potential exposure to measles in a healthcare setting, providing instructions to assess their immunity and take necessary precautions.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Spokane
Subject:
Measles surveillance
Document type:
Health assessment form
Organization:
Spokane Regional Health District
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Health care providers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Immunization Requirements for Staff in Childcare Programs
Document Type:
Staff Documentation / Worksheet
Organization / Institution:
EEC-regulated childcare programs
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Childcare staff responsible for maintaining immunization records
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Revisions:
N/A
Year:
20XX
Region / city:
London
Topic:
Measles, Mumps, Rubella
Document type:
Request form
Organ / institution:
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Author:
Health Protection Team
Target audience:
Parents/guardians of individuals suspected of having measles, mumps, or rubella
Action period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Context:
Request form for submitting oral fluid samples to confirm the presence of Measles, Mumps, or Rubella in individuals, with instructions for completing and returning the form and sample.
Date:
[ENTER DATE]
Issuing Body:
[ENTER TOWN NAME] Health Department / Board of Health
Region:
[ENTER TOWN NAME], Massachusetts, United States
Country:
United States
Type of Document:
Public Service Announcement (PSA)
Subject:
Measles outbreaks and vaccination guidance
Related Institutions:
Massachusetts Department of Public Health – Epidemiology Division; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Audience:
Residents of [ENTER TOWN NAME]; families; schools; childcare providers; local organizations
Public Health Focus:
Measles transmission, vaccination coverage, outbreak data
Epidemiological Context:
Ongoing measles outbreaks in multiple U.S. states, including New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont
Prevention Measures:
MMR vaccination, medical consultation, monitoring of symptoms, pre-travel vaccination
Vaccination Effectiveness:
93% protection after one dose; 97% protection after two doses
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Oregon, Marion, Clackamas, Multnomah Counties
Topic:
Health and Safety, Measles Outbreak
Document Type:
Public Health Advisory
Organization:
Oregon Health Authority (OHA)
Author:
Oregon Health Authority
Target Audience:
School Staff, Parents, General Public
Period of Action:
August 2024 - Ongoing
Approval Date:
2024-08-25
Date of Updates:
Ongoing
Contact Information:
[Insert LPHA contact]
Website:
https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PREVENTIONWELLNESS/VACCINESIMMUNIZATION/GETTINGIMMUNIZED/Pages/ImmRecords.aspx
Context:
A public health advisory providing guidelines for school staff and the community on how to prevent the spread of measles and what actions to take if an outbreak occurs in Oregon.
Year:
2026
Region:
United States, Montana and surrounding states
Topic:
Measles prevention, control, and vaccination
Document Type:
Resource compilation
Target Audience:
Health care and public health professionals, general public
Content Includes:
Clinical overviews, outbreak data, infection control guidelines, post-exposure prophylaxis, vaccination information, public information materials
Format:
Online documents, dashboards, flyers, checklists, PDFs
Related Period:
Current epidemiological data up to 2026
Document type:
Sample communication letter
Topic:
Measles outbreak information and vaccination guidance
Disease:
Measles
Institutions referenced:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Department of Health Services (DHS)
Geographic reference:
United States; Wisconsin
Audience:
School staff and employees
Sector:
Education and public health
Purpose:
Inform staff about measles cases and vaccination requirements
Vaccine referenced:
Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) vaccine
Related system:
Wisconsin Immunization Registry (WIR)
Responsible department mentioned:
Human Resources
Legal references:
FERPA; employment law confidentiality provisions
Distribution context:
School district internal communication
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2017
Region / Country:
Kenya, Africa
Sector:
Governance
Type of document:
Program For Results Information Document (PID)
Implementing Agency:
The National Treasury
Author:
The Republic of Kenya
Target Audience:
Government officials, policy makers, and stakeholders in governance and public management
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
August 2, 2017
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Ethiopia
Topic:
Safety Net Program
Document Type:
Aide Memoire
Organ / Institution:
Government of Ethiopia, Development Partners, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), PSNP Donor Coordination Team (DCT)
Author:
Government of Ethiopia and Development Partners
Target Audience:
Government Officials, Donors, NGOs, Stakeholders in Ethiopia’s Safety Net Program
Period of Effectiveness:
May-June 2024
Approval Date:
May-June 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Summary